Skip Navigation



Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published online on June 5, 2007

Cerebral Cortex, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm051
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
18/2/262    most recent
bhm051v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, J. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2007 The Authors
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Activity in Right Temporo-Parietal Junction is Not Selective for Theory-of-Mind

Jason P. Mitchell

Department of Psychology, Harvard University, William James Hall 1320, 33 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA

Funding to pay the Open Access publication charges for this article was provided by Harvard University. Address correspondence to: Jason Mitchell, PhD, Department of Psychology, Harvard University, William James Hall 1320, 33 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. Email: mitchell{at}wjh.harvard.edu

Recent researchers have suggested that a region of right temporo-parietal junction (RTPJ) selectively subserves the attribution of beliefs to other people (Saxe R, Kanwisher N. 2003. People thinking about thinking people: fMRI investigations of theory of mind. NeuroImage. 19:1835–1842; Saxe R, Powell LJ. 2006. It's the thought that counts: specific brain regions for one component of theory of mind. Psychol Sci. 17:692–699; Saxe R, Wexler A. 2005. Making sense of another mind: the role of the right temporo-parietal junction. Neuropsychologia. 43:1391–1399). At the same time, a similar RTPJ region has been observed repeatedly in a variety of nonsocial tasks that require participants to redirect attention to task-relevant stimuli (e.g., Corbetta M, Shulman GL. 2002. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 3:201–215; Serences JT, Shomstein S, Leber AB, Golay X, Egeth HE, Yantis S. 2005. Coordination of voluntary and stimulus-driven attentional control in human cortex. Psychol Sci. 16:114–122). However, because these 2 sets of tasks have never been compared within the same participants, it remains unclear whether these observations refer to the exact same region of RTPJ or may instead involve neighboring regions with distinct functional profiles. To test the claim that there is a region of RTPJ selective for belief attribution, the current study used functional neuroimaging to examine the extent to which cortical loci identified by a "theory-of-mind localizer" also distinguish between trials on a target detection task that varied demands to reorient attention (i.e., a version of the "Posner cueing task"). Results were incompatible with claims of RTPJ selectivity for mental state attribution. Regardless of whether regions were defined from group analyses or were individually tailored for each participant, RTPJ activity was also modulated by the nonsocial attentional task. The overlap between theory-of-mind and attentional reorienting suggests the need for new accounts of RTPJ function that integrate across these disparate task comparisons.

Key Words: social cognition • mentalizing • attention • Posner cueing task • functional magnetic resonance imaging


Funding to pay the Open Access publication charges for this article was provided by ...


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soc Cogn Affect NeurosciHome page
W. van den Bos, E. van Dijk, M. Westenberg, S. A.R.B. Rombouts, and E. A. Crone
What motivates repayment? Neural correlates of reciprocity in the Trust Game
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, September 1, 2009; 4(3): 294 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
M. Brass, P. Ruby, and S. Spengler
Inhibition of imitative behaviour and social cognition
Phil Trans R Soc B, August 27, 2009; 364(1528): 2359 - 2367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Zaki, J. Weber, N. Bolger, and K. Ochsner
The neural bases of empathic accuracy
PNAS, July 7, 2009; 106(27): 11382 - 11387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Bedny, A. Pascual-Leone, and R. R. Saxe
Growing up blind does not change the neural bases of Theory of Mind
PNAS, July 7, 2009; 106(27): 11312 - 11317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. Coricelli and R. Nagel
Neural correlates of depth of strategic reasoning in medial prefrontal cortex
PNAS, June 9, 2009; 106(23): 9163 - 9168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A. C. Jenkins and J. P. Mitchell
Mentalizing under Uncertainty: Dissociated Neural Responses to Ambiguous and Unambiguous Mental State Inferences
Cereb Cortex, May 28, 2009; (2009) bhp109v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
J. P. Mitchell
Inferences about mental states
Phil Trans R Soc B, May 12, 2009; 364(1521): 1309 - 1316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
F. Krueger, J. Grafman, and K. McCabe
Neural correlates of economic game playing
Phil Trans R Soc B, December 12, 2008; 363(1511): 3859 - 3874.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.