Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published online on November 23, 2006
Cerebral Cortex, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl127
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Laboratory of Neural Microcircuitry, Brain Mind Institute, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne 1015, Switzerland
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Neocortical pyramidal cells (PCs) project to various cortical and subcortical targets. In layer V, the population of thick tufted PCs (TTCs) projects to subcortical targets such as the tectum, brainstem, and spinal cord. Another population of layer V PCs projects via the corpus callosum to the contralateral neocortical hemisphere mediating information transfer between the hemispheres. This subpopulation (corticocallosally projecting cells [CCPs]) has been previously described in terms of their morphological properties, but less is known about their electrophysiological properties, and their synaptic connectivity is unknown. We studied the morphological, electrophysiological, and synaptic properties of CCPs by retrograde labeling with fluorescent microbeads in P13-P16 Wistar rats. CCPs were characterized by shorter, untufted apical dendrites, which reached only up to layers II/III, confirming previous reports. Synaptic connections between CCPs were different from those observed between TTCs, both in probability of occurrence and dynamic properties. We found that the CCP network is about 4 times less interconnected than the TTC network and the probability of release is 24% smaller, resulting in a more linear synaptic transmission. The study shows that layer V pyramidal neurons projecting to different targets form subnetworks with specialized connectivity profiles, in addition to the specialized morphological and electrophysiological intrinsic properties.
Article
Morphological, Electrophysiological, and Synaptic Properties of Corticocallosal Pyramidal Cells in the Neonatal Rat Neocortex
Jean-Vincent Le Bé 1, Gilad Silberberg 2, Yun Wang 3, and Henry Markram 1 *
2 Laboratory of Neural Microcircuitry, Brain Mind Institute, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne 1015, Switzerland; Nobel Institute for Neurophysiology, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
3 Division of Neurology Research, Caritas St Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
Henry Markram, E-mail: henry.markram{at}epfl.ch
Abstract 
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. A. Llano and S. M. Sherman Differences in Intrinsic Properties and Local Network Connectivity of Identified Layer 5 and Layer 6 Adult Mouse Auditory Corticothalamic Neurons Support a Dual Corticothalamic Projection Hypothesis Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2009; 19(12): 2810 - 2826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Fares and A. Stepanyants Cooperative synapse formation in the neocortex PNAS, September 22, 2009; 106(38): 16463 - 16468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Groh, H. S. Meyer, E. F. Schmidt, N. Heintz, B. Sakmann, and P. Krieger Cell-Type Specific Properties of Pyramidal Neurons in Neocortex Underlying a Layout that Is Modifiable Depending on the Cortical Area Cereb Cortex, July 30, 2009; (2009) bhp152v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Kumar and O. Ohana Inter- and Intralaminar Subcircuits of Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons in Layer 6a of the Rat Barrel Cortex J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2008; 100(4): 1909 - 1922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|