Skip Navigation



Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published online on September 8, 2006
Cerebral Cortex, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl075
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/7/1664    most recent
bhl075v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hahn, B.
Right arrow Articles by Stein, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hahn, B.
Right arrow Articles by Stein, E. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press 2006.

Article

Cingulate Activation Increases Dynamically with Response Speed under Stimulus Unpredictability

Britta Hahn 1 *, Thomas J. Ross 1, and Elliot A. Stein 1

1 Neuroimaging Research Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Britta Hahn, E-mail: bhahn{at}intra.nida.nih.gov


  Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of cognition require repeated and consistent engagement of the cognitive process under investigation. Activation is generally averaged across trials that are assumed to tax a specific mental operation or state, whereas intraindividual variability in performance between trials is usually considered error variance. A more recent analysis approach postulates that these fluctuations can reflect variation in the very process taxed by the particular trial type. In the present study, participants responded to targets presented randomly in 1 of 4 peripheral locations. By employing a function of reaction time (RT) of individual trials as a linear regressor, brain regions were identified whose activation varied with RT on a trial-by-trial basis. Whole-brain analysis revealed that the anterior cingulate, posterior cingulate, and left angular/superior temporal gyri were more active in trials with faster RT but only when the target location was unpredictable. No such association was seen in trials where the target location was predicted by a central cue. These results suggest a role for the cingulate and angular gyri in the dynamic regulation of attention to unpredictable events. This is in accordance with the function of a default network that is active in the absence of top-down-focused attention and is thought to continuously provide resources for broad and spontaneous information gathering. Exploiting intertrial performance variability may be particularly suitable for capturing such spontaneous and elusive phenomena as stimulus-driven processes of attention.

Keywords: anterior cingulate; attention; bottom-up; intertrial variability; posterior cingulate; reaction time.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
B. Morillon, C. A. Kell, and A.-L. Giraud
Three Stages and Four Neural Systems in Time Estimation
J. Neurosci., November 25, 2009; 29(47): 14803 - 14811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ScienceHome page
S. J. Gilbert, I. Dumontheil, J. S. Simons, C. D. Frith, and P. W. Burgess
Comment on "Wandering Minds: The Default Network and Stimulus-Independent Thought"
Science, July 6, 2007; 317(5834): 43b - 43b.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.