Skip Navigation



Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published online on December 15, 2005
Cerebral Cortex, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj091
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/11/1556    most recent
bhj091v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Senkowski, D.
Right arrow Articles by Foxe, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Senkowski, D.
Right arrow Articles by Foxe, J. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Article

Oscillatory Beta Activity Predicts Response Speed during a Multisensory Audiovisual Reaction Time Task: A High-Density Electrical Mapping Study

Daniel Senkowski 1, Sophie Molholm 1, Manuel Gomez-Ramirez 2, and John J. Foxe 2 *

1 The Cognitive Neurophysiology Laboratory, Program in Cognitive Neuroscience, Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY 10962, USA
2 The Cognitive Neurophysiology Laboratory, Program in Cognitive Neuroscience, Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY 10962, USA; Program in Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, The City College of the City University of New York, New York, NY 10031, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
John J. Foxe, E-mail: foxe{at}nki.rfmh.org


  Abstract

Bisensory redundant targets are processed faster than the respective unisensory target stimuli alone as evidenced by substantially faster reaction times (RTs). This multisensory RT facilitation has been interpreted as an expression of integrative processing between the different sensory modalities. However, the neuronal mechanisms underlying the RT facilitation effect are not well understood. Oscillatory responses in the beta frequency range (13-30 Hz) have been related to sensory-motor processing. Here, we investigated whether modulation of beta responses might also underlie the faster RTs seen for multisensory stimuli. Using high-density electrical mapping, we explored the association between early (50-170 ms) multisensory processing in the evoked beta response and RTs recorded during a simple RT task. Subjects were instructed to indicate the appearance of any stimulus in a stream of auditory-alone (A), visual-alone (V), and multisensory (AV) stimuli by a button press. Beta responses were analyzed using Morlet wavelet transformations. Multisensory interactions were found over frontal, occipital, central, and sensory-motor regions. Critically, beta activity correlated with mean RTs over all stimulus types. Significant negative correlations were found for frontal, occipital, and sensory-motor scalp regions. We conclude that the association between oscillatory beta activity and integrative multisensory processing is directly linked to multisensory RT facilitation effects.

Keywords: cross-modal; EEG; ERP; motor system; sensory integration.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
G. Gingras, B. A. Rowland, and B. E. Stein
The Differing Impact of Multisensory and Unisensory Integration on Behavior
J. Neurosci., April 15, 2009; 29(15): 4897 - 4902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.