Skip Navigation


Cerebral Cortex Advance Access first published online on December 22, 2005
This version published online on December 27, 2005
Cerebral Cortex, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj090
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/11/1531    most recent
bhj090v2
bhj090v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wielaard, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sajda, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wielaard, J.
Right arrow Articles by Sajda, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Article

Extraclassical Receptive Field Phenomena and Short-Range Connectivity in V1

Jim Wielaard 1 * and Paul Sajda 1

1 Laboratory for Intelligent Imaging and Neural Computing, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Jim Wielaard, E-mail: djw21{at}columbia.edu


  Abstract

Extraclassical receptive field phenomena in V1 are commonly attributed to long-range lateral connections and/or extrastriate feedback. We address 2 such phenomena: surround suppression and receptive field expansion at low contrast. We present rigorous computational support for the hypothesis that the phenomena largely result from local short-range (<0.5 mm) cortical connections and lateral geniculate nucleus input. The neural mechanisms of surround suppression in our simulations operate via (A) enhancement of inhibition, (B) reduction of excitation, or (C) action of both simultaneously. Mechanisms (B) and (C) are substantially more prevalent than (A). We observe, on average, a growth in the spatial summation extent of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs for low-contrast stimuli. However, we find this is neither sufficient nor necessary to explain receptive field expansion at low contrast, which usually involves additional changes in the relative gain of these inputs.

Keywords: model; receptive field; simulation; spatial summation; surround suppression; visual cortex.
On page 7, the second- and third-to-last sentences of the last full paragraph on page 7 have been corrected to read radius instead of diameter.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. Wielaard and P. Sajda
Dependence of Response Properties on Sparse Connectivity in a Spiking Neuron Model of the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3292 - 3308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.