Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published online on August 31, 2005
Cerebral Cortex, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj026
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Psychology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. In this experiment using a color-word Stroop task, we explored whether different regions of prefrontal cortex bias selection of response-related processes as compared with non-response-related processes. To manipulate demands at the level of response selection, we varied the degree of overlap between stimulus-response mappings in a manual Stroop task. To vary demands at a non-response level, we compared activation for incongruent trials (e.g. the word purple in blue ink) that contain two color representations, one in the word and one in the ink color, to neutral trials (e.g. the word drawer in blue ink), which contain only one color representation, that in the ink color. These manipulations had differential effects within prefrontal cortex. Both a region of right inferior frontal cortex and caudal regions of the cingulate were sensitive to the selection demands at the response-level and insensitive to demands at the non-response level. In contrast, a more anterior region of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was sensitive to the number of color representations (i.e. incongruent versus neutral trials), but not to the overlap in stimulus-response mappings. Therefore, this study indicates a functional differentiation for implementing attentional control within prefrontal cortex.
Article
Functional Dissociation of Attentional Selection within PFC: Response and Non-response Related Aspects of Attentional Selection as Ascertained by fMRI
2 Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80309-0345, USA
Xun Liu, E-mail: xun.liu{at}uky.edu
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Wood, A. Ischebeck, F. Koppelstaetter, T. Gotwald, and L. Kaufmann Developmental Trajectories of Magnitude Processing and Interference Control: An fMRI Study Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2009; 19(11): 2755 - 2765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. V. Mitchell, Q. Luo, S. B. Avny, T. Kasprzycki, K. Gupta, G. Chen, E. C. Finger, and R. J. R. Blair Adapting to Dynamic Stimulus-Response Values: Differential Contributions of Inferior Frontal, Dorsomedial, and Dorsolateral Regions of Prefrontal Cortex to Decision Making J. Neurosci., September 2, 2009; 29(35): 10827 - 10834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Cavina-Pratesi, R. W. Kentridge, C. A. Heywood, and A. D. Milner Separate Processing of Texture and Form in the Ventral Stream: Evidence from fMRI and Visual Agnosia Cereb Cortex, May 28, 2009; (2009) bhp111v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Polk, R. M. Drake, J. J. Jonides, M. R. Smith, and E. E. Smith Attention Enhances the Neural Processing of Relevant Features and Suppresses the Processing of Irrelevant Features in Humans: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of the Stroop Task J. Neurosci., December 17, 2008; 28(51): 13786 - 13792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-C. Leung and W. Cai Common and Differential Ventrolateral Prefrontal Activity during Inhibition of Hand and Eye Movements J. Neurosci., September 12, 2007; 27(37): 9893 - 9900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

