Cerebral Cortex Advance Access first published online on July 20, 2005
This version published online on July 28, 2005
Cerebral Cortex, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj005
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Cognitive Development and Laboratory of Neurophysiology, University of Louvain, Belgium
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. The middle fusiform gyrus (MFG) and the inferior occipital gyrus (IOG) are activated by both detection and identification of faces. Paradoxically, patients with acquired prosopagnosia following lesions to either of these regions in the right hemisphere cannot identify faces, but can still detect faces. Here we acquired functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data during face processing in a patient presenting a specific deficit in individual face recognition, following lesions encompassing the right IOG. Using an adaptation paradigm we show that the fMRI signal in the rMFG of the patient, while being larger in response to faces as compared to objects, does not differ between conditions presenting identical and distinct faces, in contrast to the larger response to distinct faces observed in controls. These results suggest that individual discrimination of faces critically depends on the integrity of both the rMFG and the rIOG, which may interact through re-entrant cortical connections in the normal brain.
Article
Impaired Face Discrimination in Acquired Prosopagnosia Is Associated with Abnormal Response to Individual Faces in the Right Middle Fusiform Gyrus
2 Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, The Netherlands; F.C. Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
3 Department of Psychology, University of Glasgow, UK
4 Department of Neurology, University Hospital Geneva, Switzerland
Christine Schiltz, E-mail: schiltz{at}nefy.ucl.ac.be
![]()
Abstract
Figure 5 has been replaced.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. C. Goll Novel Hypotheses from a Neuropsychological Case Study: Is the Visual Ventral Cortex Critical for Both Category-Generic and Category-Specific Form Perception? J. Neurosci., September 16, 2009; 29(37): 11421 - 11423. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. V. Peelen, N. Lucas, E. Mayer, and P. Vuilleumier Emotional attention in acquired prosopagnosia Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, September 1, 2009; 4(3): 268 - 277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Beglinger, K. Duff, D. J. Moser, S. A. Cross, and D. A. Kareken The Indiana Faces in Places Test: Preliminary Findings on a New Visuospatial Memory Test in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment Arch Clin Neuropsychol, September 1, 2009; 24(6): 607 - 618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Bell, F. Hadj-Bouziane, J. B. Frihauf, R. B. H. Tootell, and L. G. Ungerleider Object Representations in the Temporal Cortex of Monkeys and Humans as Revealed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2009; 101(2): 688 - 700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Kriegeskorte, E. Formisano, B. Sorger, and R. Goebel Individual faces elicit distinct response patterns in human anterior temporal cortex PNAS, December 18, 2007; 104(51): 20600 - 20605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Pascalis, D. J. Kelly, and R. Caldara What can bees really tell us about the face processing system in humans? J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2006; 209(16): 3266 - 3266. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





