Skip Navigation



Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published online on July 6, 2005
Cerebral Cortex, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi127
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/4/475    most recent
bhi127v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crone, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bunge, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crone, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bunge, S. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Article

Neural Evidence for Dissociable Components of Task-switching

Eveline A. Crone 1*, Carter Wendelken 2, Sarah E. Donohue 2, and Silvia A. Bunge 3

1 Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2 Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, USA
3 Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, USA; Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Eveline A. Crone, E-mail: ecrone{at}fsw.leidenuniv.nl


  Abstract

The ability to retrieve and flexibly switch between task rules is seen as an important component of cognitive control. It is often assumed that lateral prefrontal cortex (latPFC) is important for switching between rules. However, activation associated with rule-switching is less reliably observed in latPFC than in medial PFC (specifically, pre-supplementary motor area). In this study, we tested the hypothesis that medial PFC is important for reconfiguration of task sets, whereas latPFC is important for retrieving, maintaining and implementing relevant rules (i.e. rule representation). Twenty young adults participated in a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in which they determined the correct response to a target stimulus on the basis of an instructional cue. For bivalent targets, the appropriate response depended on the currently relevant rule. In contrast, univalent targets were always associated with the same response. Brain regions of interest were characterized according to their responsiveness to bivalent and univalent targets, on both rule-switch and rule-repetition trials. The data support the hypothesis that rule representation and task-set reconfiguration are separable cognitive processes, associated with dissociable neural activation in latPFC and medial PFC, respectively. Activation profiles of posterior parietal cortex, basal ganglia and rostrolateral PFC are also examined and discussed.

Keywords: context; goal; pre-SMA; reconfiguration; rule; task set; task switching; VLPFC.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Isoda and O. Hikosaka
Role for Subthalamic Nucleus Neurons in Switching from Automatic to Controlled Eye Movement
J. Neurosci., July 9, 2008; 28(28): 7209 - 7218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
C.-s. R. Li, C. Huang, P. Yan, P. Paliwal, R. T. Constable, and R. Sinha
Neural Correlates of Post-error Slowing during a Stop Signal Task: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., June 1, 2008; 20(6): 1021 - 1029.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
S. E. Donohue, C. Wendelken, and S. A. Bunge
Neural correlates of preparation for action selection as a function of specific task demands.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., April 1, 2008; 20(4): 694 - 706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
D. E. Astle, G. M. Jackson, and R. Swainson
Fractionating the Cognitive Control Required to Bring About a Change in Task: A Dense-sensor Event-related Potential Study.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., February 1, 2008; 20(2): 255 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
P. C. J. Taylor, A. C. Nobre, and M. F. S. Rushworth
Subsecond Changes in Top Down Control Exerted by Human Medial Frontal Cortex during Conflict and Action Selection: A Combined Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Electroencephalography Study
J. Neurosci., October 17, 2007; 27(42): 11343 - 11353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. U. F. Dosenbach, D. A. Fair, F. M. Miezin, A. L. Cohen, K. K. Wenger, R. A. T. Dosenbach, M. D. Fox, A. Z. Snyder, J. L. Vincent, M. E. Raichle, et al.
Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans
PNAS, June 26, 2007; 104(26): 11073 - 11078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BrainHome page
S. Rivaud-Pechoux, M. Vidailhet, J. P. Brandel, and B. Gaymard
Mixing pro- and antisaccades in patients with parkinsonian syndromes
Brain, January 1, 2007; 130(1): 256 - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
E. A. Crone, S. E. Donohue, R. Honomichl, C. Wendelken, and S. A. Bunge
Brain Regions Mediating Flexible Rule Use during Development
J. Neurosci., October 25, 2006; 26(43): 11239 - 11247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. Badre and A. D. Wagner
Computational and neurobiological mechanisms underlying cognitive flexibility
PNAS, May 2, 2006; 103(18): 7186 - 7191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.