Skip Navigation



Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published online on September 30, 2004

Cerebral Cortex, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh178
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
15/6/770    most recent
bhh178v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, S.
Right arrow Articles by Driver, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, S.
Right arrow Articles by Driver, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Article

Attentional Load and Sensory Competition in Human Vision: Modulation of fMRI Responses by Load at Fixation during Task-irrelevant Stimulation in the Peripheral Visual Field

Sophie Schwartz 1*, Patrik Vuilleumier 2, Chloe Hutton 3, Angelo Maravita 4, Raymond J. Dolan 3, and Jon Driver 5

1 Laboratory for Neurology and Imaging of Cognition, Departments of Neurosciences & Clinical Neurology, University of Geneva, Switzerland; Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, UK
2 Laboratory for Neurology and Imaging of Cognition, Departments of Neurosciences & Clinical Neurology, University of Geneva, Switzerland; Department of Psychology, University of Geneva, Switzerland
3 Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, London, UK
4 Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, UK; Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università di Milano, Bicocca, Italy
5 Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, UK; Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, London, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sophie.schwartz{at}medecine.unige.ch.


   Abstract

Perceptual suppression of distractors may depend on both endogenous and exogenous factors, such as attentional load of the current task and sensory competition among simultaneous stimuli, respectively. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to compare these two types of attentional effects and examine how they may interact in the human brain. We varied the attentional load of a visual monitoring task performed on a rapid stream at central fixation without altering the central stimuli themselves, while measuring the impact on fMRI responses to task-irrelevant peripheral checkerboards presented either unilaterally or bilaterally. Activations in visual cortex for irrelevant peripheral stimulation decreased with increasing attentional load at fixation. This relative decrease was present even in V1, but became larger for successive visual areas through to V4. Decreases in activation for contralateral peripheral checkerboards due to higher central load were more pronounced within retinotopic cortex corresponding to ‘inner’ peripheral locations relatively near the central targets than for more eccentric ‘outer’ locations, demonstrating a predominant suppression of nearby surround rather than strict ‘tunnel vision’ during higher task load at central fixation. Contralateral activations for peripheral stimulation in one hemifield were reduced by competition with concurrent stimulation in the other hemifield only in inferior parietal cortex, not in retinotopic areas of occipital visual cortex. In addition, central attentional load interacted with competition due to bilateral versus unilateral peripheral stimuli specifically in posterior parietal and fusiform regions. These results reveal that task-dependent attentional load, and interhemifield stimulus-competition, can produce distinct influences on the neural responses to peripheral visual stimuli within the human visual system. These distinct mechanisms in selective visual processing may be integrated within posterior parietal areas, rather than earlier occipital cortex.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cogn Affect Behav NeurosciHome page
C. A. Yadon, J. M. Bugg, M. A. Kisley, and D. B. Davalos
P50 sensory gating is related to performance on select tasks of cognitive inhibition
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, December 1, 2009; 9(4): 448 - 458.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cogn Affect Behav NeurosciHome page
J. A. Hinojosa, L. Carretie, M. A. Valcarcel, C. Mendez-Bertolo, and M. A. Pozo
Electrophysiological differences in the processing of affective information in words and pictures
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, June 1, 2009; 9(2): 173 - 189.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Desseilles, E. Balteau, V. Sterpenich, T. T. Dang-Vu, A. Darsaud, G. Vandewalle, G. Albouy, E. Salmon, F. Peters, C. Schmidt, et al.
Abnormal Neural Filtering of Irrelevant Visual Information in Depression
J. Neurosci., February 4, 2009; 29(5): 1395 - 1403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A. P. Saygin and M. I. Sereno
Retinotopy and Attention in Human Occipital, Temporal, Parietal, and Frontal Cortex
Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2008; 18(9): 2158 - 2168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
M. M. Muller, S. K. Andersen, and A. Keil
Time Course of Competition for Visual Processing Resources between Emotional Pictures and Foreground Task
Cereb Cortex, August 1, 2008; 18(8): 1892 - 1899.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. Muggleton, R. Lamb, V. Walsh, and N. Lavie
Perceptual Load Modulates Visual Cortex Excitability to Magnetic Stimulation
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 516 - 519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
C. C. Ruff, S. Bestmann, F. Blankenburg, O. Bjoertomt, O. Josephs, N. Weiskopf, R. Deichmann, and J. Driver
Distinct Causal Influences of Parietal Versus Frontal Areas on Human Visual Cortex: Evidence from Concurrent TMS-fMRI
Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2008; 18(4): 817 - 827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. Soto, G. W. Humphreys, and P. Rotshtein
Dissociating the neural mechanisms of memory-based guidance of visual selection
PNAS, October 23, 2007; 104(43): 17186 - 17191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. L. Cotton and A. T. Smith
Contralateral Visual Hemifield Representations in the Human Pulvinar Nucleus
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1600 - 1609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
P. Vuilleumier and J. Driver
Modulation of visual processing by attention and emotion: windows on causal interactions between human brain regions
Phil Trans R Soc B, May 29, 2007; 362(1481): 837 - 855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. D. Swisher, M. A. Halko, L. B. Merabet, S. A. McMains, and D. C. Somers
Visual Topography of Human Intraparietal Sulcus
J. Neurosci., May 16, 2007; 27(20): 5326 - 5337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
C. Jacques and B. Rossion
Electrophysiological Evidence for Temporal Dissociation between Spatial Attention and Sensory Competition during Human Face Processing
Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2007; 17(5): 1055 - 1065.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. J. Geng, E. Eger, C. C. Ruff, A. Kristjansson, P. Rotshtein, and J. Driver
On-Line Attentional Selection From Competing Stimuli in Opposite Visual Fields: Effects on Human Visual Cortex and Control Processes
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2006; 96(5): 2601 - 2612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.