Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published online on August 18, 2004
Cerebral Cortex, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh148
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: axon{at}cortex.rutgers.edu.
While the receptive field properties of single neurons in the inferior parietal cortex have been quantitatively described from numerous electrical measurements, the visual topography of area 7a and the adjacent dorsal prelunate area (DP) remains unknown. This lacuna may be a technical byproduct of the difficulty of reconstructing tens to hundreds of penetrations, or may be the result of varying functional retinotopic architectures. Intrinsic optical imaging, performed in behaving monkey for extended periods of time, was used to evaluate retinotopy simultaneously at multiple positions across the cortical surface. As electrical recordings through an implanted artificial dura are difficult, the measurement and quantification of retinotopy with long-term recordings was validated by imaging early visual cortex (areas V1 and V2). Retinotopic topography was found in each of the three other areas studied within a single day's experiment. However, the ventral portion of DP (DPv) had a retinotopic topography that varied from day to day, while the more dorsal aspects (DPd) exhibited consistent retinotopy. This suggests that the dorsal prelunate gyrus may consist of more than one visual area. The retinotopy of area 7a also varied from day to day. Possible mechanisms for this variability across days are discussed as well as its impact upon our understanding of the representation of extrapersonal space in the inferior parietal cortex.
Article
Functional Architecture of Retinotopy in Visual Association Cortex of Behaving Monkey
2 Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA; Present address: Institute of Physiology, Medical School of Pecs, Hungary
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. E. Huddleston and E. A. DeYoe The Representation of Spatial Attention in Human Parietal Cortex Dynamically Modulates with Performance Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2008; 18(6): 1272 - 1280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Quraishi, B. Heider, and R. M. Siegel Attentional Modulation of Receptive Field Structure in Area 7a of the Behaving Monkey Cereb Cortex, August 1, 2007; 17(8): 1841 - 1857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Siegel, J.-R. Duann, T.-P. Jung, and T. Sejnowski Spatiotemporal Dynamics of the Functional Architecture for Gain Fields in Inferior Parietal Lobule of Behaving Monkey Cereb Cortex, February 1, 2007; 17(2): 378 - 390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Rozzi, R. Calzavara, A. Belmalih, E. Borra, G. G. Gregoriou, M. Matelli, and G. Luppino Cortical Connections of the Inferior Parietal Cortical Convexity of the Macaque Monkey Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2006; 16(10): 1389 - 1417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Raffi and R. M. Siegel Functional Architecture of Spatial Attention in the Parietal Cortex of the Behaving Monkey J. Neurosci., May 25, 2005; 25(21): 5171 - 5186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

