Skip Navigation



Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published online on April 27, 2004

Cerebral Cortex, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh045
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
14/8/863    most recent
bhh045v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Merigan, W. H.
Right arrow Articles by Saunders, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Merigan, W. H.
Right arrow Articles by Saunders, R. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Article

Unilateral Deficits in Visual Perception and Learning after Unilateral Inferotemporal Cortex Lesions in Macaques

William H. Merigan 1* Richard C. Saunders 2

1 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA; Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
2 Laboratory of Neuropsychology, NIMH, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: billm{at}cvs.rochester.edu.


   Abstract

This study adapted the method of partial lesions, combined with controlled fixation, to study the perceptual role of macaque infero-temporal (IT) cortex. Unilateral lesions were made in IT cortex of three monkeys, without section of the corpus callosum, and visual function was tested ipsilateral and contralateral to the lesion. The observed changes were compared to the effects of bilateral lesions of IT cortex in one monkey, the approach used in most previous studies. Unilateral lesions produced far less profound, although more selective, loss on the tested visual abilities than did bilateral lesions. All three monkeys with unilateral lesions showed decreased chromatic sensitivity, but sparing of achromatic sensitivity, and severely disrupted learning and performance of visual matching to sample, and in all cases, the visual loss was contralateral to the site of the lesion. Unexpectedly, the magnitude of the contralateral loss was not increased by later section of the corpus callosum and anterior commissure in one of the monkeys, a lesion that removes interhemisperic input to contralateral from ipsilateral temporal cortex neurons. These results support physiological findings that show that the response of IT cortex neurons is dominated by the contralateral visual field, despite the bilateral activation many IT neurons receive. Comparison to earlier studies of lesions of area V4, which provides input to IT cortex, shows that V4 and IT lesions produce qualitatively different effects.

Key Words: color, inferotemporal cortex, learning, matching, macaque, shape


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. H. Bell, F. Hadj-Bouziane, J. B. Frihauf, R. B. H. Tootell, and L. G. Ungerleider
Object Representations in the Temporal Cortex of Monkeys and Humans as Revealed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2009; 101(2): 688 - 700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. Kawasaki and D. L. Sheinberg
Learning to Recognize Visual Objects With Microstimulation in Inferior Temporal Cortex
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 197 - 211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
S. E. Bouvier and S. A. Engel
Behavioral Deficits and Cortical Damage Loci in Cerebral Achromatopsia
Cereb Cortex, February 1, 2006; 16(2): 183 - 191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.