Skip Navigation



Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published online on April 14, 2004
Cerebral Cortex, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh036
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
14/7/759    most recent
bhh036v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vajda, I.
Right arrow Articles by van de Grind, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vajda, I.
Right arrow Articles by van de Grind, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Article

Dynamics of Directional Selectivity in Area 18 and PMLS of the Cat

Ildikó Vajda 1*, Martin J. M. Lankheet 1, Bart G. Borghuis 1, Wim A. van de Grind 1

1 Department of Functional Neurobiology and Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: i.vajda{at}nih.knaw.nl.


  Abstract

Visual latencies and temporal dynamics of area 18 and PMLS direction-selective complex cells were defined with a reverse correlation method. The method allowed us to analyze the time course of responses to motion steps, without confounding temporal integration effects. Several measures of response latency and direction tuning dynamics were quantified: optimal latency (OL), latency of first and last significant responses (FSR, LSR), the increase and decrease of direction sensitivity in time, and the change of direction tuning in time. FSR, OL and LSR values for PMLS and area 18 largely over-lapped. The small differences in mean latencies (3-4 ms for FSR and OL and 11.9 ms for the LSR) were not statistically significant. All cells in area 18 and the vast majority of cells in PMLS showed no systematic changes in preferred direction (monophasic neurons). In PMLS 5 out of 41 cells showed a reversal of preferred direction after ~56 ms relative to their OL (biphasic neurons). Monophasic cells showed no systematic changes in direction tuning width during the interval from FSR to LSR. In both areas, development of direction sensitivity was significantly faster than return to the non-direction sensitive state, but no significant difference was found between the two areas. We conclude that, for the monophasic type of direction-selective complex cells, the dynamics of primary motion processing are highly comparable for area 18 and PMLS. This suggests that motion information is predominantly processed in parallel, presumably based on input from the fast conducting thalamocortical Y-pathway.

Key Words: cat extrastriate area, motion vision, random pixel array, reverse correlation, single unit recording


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N.S.C. Price, N. A. Crowder, M. A. Hietanen, and M. R. Ibbotson
Neurons in V1, V2, and PMLS of Cat Cortex Are Speed Tuned But Not Acceleration Tuned: The Influence of Motion Adaptation
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2006; 95(2): 660 - 673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.