Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (43)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eysel, U. T.
Right arrow Articles by Schweigart, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eysel, U. T.
Right arrow Articles by Schweigart, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 9, No. 2, 101-109, March 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press

Increased Receptive Field Size in the Surround of Chronic Lesions in the Adult Cat Visual Cortex

Ulf T. Eysel and Georg Schweigart

Department of Neurophysiology, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, D-44780 Bochum, Germany

Visual cortical lesions destroy the target cells for geniculocortical fibers from a certain retinotopic region. This leads to a cortical scotoma. We have investigated the receptive fields of cells in the visual cortex before, 2 days and 2 months after focal ibotenic acid lesions in the adult cat visual cortex and have found signs of receptive field plasticity in the surroundings of the chronic but not the acute and subacute excitotoxic lesions. In the subacute state (first two days post lesion) receptive field sizes of cells at the border of the lesion were reduced in size or remained unchanged. Remapping of cortical receptive fields 2 months later revealed a number of cells with multifold enlarged receptive fields at the border of the lesion. The cells with enlarged receptive fields displayed orientation and direction selectivity like normal cells. The size increase appeared not specifically directed towards the scotoma; however, the enlarged receptive fields can reduce the extent of a cortical scotoma, since previously unresponsive regions of the visual field activate cortical cells at the border of the lesion. This late receptive field plasticity could serve as a mechanism for the filling-in of cortical scotomata observed in patients with visual cortex lesions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
T.-T. Hu, A. Laeremans, U. T. Eysel, L. Cnops, and L. Arckens
Analysis of c-fos and zif268 Expression Reveals Time-Dependent Changes in Activity Inside and Outside the Lesion Projection Zone in Adult Cat Area 17 after Retinal Lesions
Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2009; 19(12): 2982 - 2992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
I. R. Winship and T. H. Murphy
Remapping the Somatosensory Cortex after Stroke: Insight from Imaging the Synapse to Network
Neuroscientist, October 1, 2009; 15(5): 507 - 524.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. R. Huxlin, T. Martin, K. Kelly, M. Riley, D. I. Friedman, W. S. Burgin, and M. Hayhoe
Perceptual Relearning of Complex Visual Motion after V1 Damage in Humans
J. Neurosci., April 1, 2009; 29(13): 3981 - 3991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
M. Fahle
Perceptual learning and sensomotor flexibility: cortical plasticity under attentional control?
Phil Trans R Soc B, February 12, 2009; 364(1515): 313 - 319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J OphthalmolHome page
D P Alvarenga, M F Couto, and V F Pessoa
Filling in at partially deafferented visual cortex
Br J Ophthalmol, September 1, 2008; 92(9): 1257 - 1260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
R. S. Marshall, J. J. Ferrera, A. Barnes, Xian Zhang, K. A. O'Brien, M. Chmayssani, J. Hirsch, and R. M. Lazar
Brain Activity Associated With Stimulation Therapy of the Visual Borderzone in Hemianopic Stroke Patients
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, April 1, 2008; 22(2): 136 - 144.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Grabska-Barwinska and C. von der Malsburg
Establishment of a Scaffold for Orientation Maps in Primary Visual Cortex of Higher Mammals
J. Neurosci., January 2, 2008; 28(1): 249 - 257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
I. P. Conner, J. V. Odom, T. L. Schwartz, and J. D. Mendola
Retinotopic maps and foveal suppression in the visual cortex of amblyopic adults
J. Physiol., August 15, 2007; 583(1): 159 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
M. Huemmeke, U. T. Eysel, and T. Mittmann
Lesion-induced enhancement of LTP in rat visual cortex is mediated by NMDA receptors containing the NR2B subunit
J. Physiol., September 15, 2004; 559(3): 875 - 882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Zepeda, F. Sengpiel, M. A. Guagnelli, L. Vaca, and C. Arias
Functional Reorganization of Visual Cortex Maps after Ischemic Lesions Is Accompanied by Changes in Expression of Cytoskeletal Proteins and NMDA and GABAA Receptor Subunits
J. Neurosci., February 25, 2004; 24(8): 1812 - 1821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. B. Calford, L. L. Wright, A. B. Metha, and V. Taglianetti
Topographic Plasticity in Primary Visual Cortex Is Mediated by Local Corticocortical Connections
J. Neurosci., July 23, 2003; 23(16): 6434 - 6442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. Nelles, G. Widman, A. de Greiff, A. Meistrowitz, A. Dimitrova, J. Weber, M. Forsting, J. Esser, and H. C. Diener
Brain Representation of Hemifield Stimulation in Poststroke Visual Field Defects
Stroke, May 1, 2002; 33(5): 1286 - 1293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.