Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tettoni, L.
Right arrow Articles by Innocenti, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tettoni, L.
Right arrow Articles by Innocenti, G. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex, Vol 8, 543-552, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


Constant and variable aspects of axonal phenotype in cerebral cortex

L Tettoni, F Gheorghita-Baechler, R Bressoud, E Welker and GM Innocenti
Institut de Biologie Cellulaire et de Morphologie, Universite de Lausanne, Switzerland.

In order to determine to what extent the terminal arbors of phylogenetically and functionally distant axons are constructed according to common rules, we have compared visual callosal axons in cats (CCC axons) with thalamocortical axons to the whisker representation in mice (MTC axons). Both similarities and differences were found. Maximal order of branching, branching angles, topological distribution of branches and boutons are similar for all axons, indicating strong constraints in arbor formation. CCC and MTC axons are indistinguishable for total arbor length and number of branches, although these parameters can vary across individual axons of each group. MTC axons have longer and bouton-richer end-branches (the 'transmission compartment') while, in CCC axons, proximal, boutonless branches (the 'conduction compartment') predominate. Therefore, the two classes of axons appear to be specialized for performing different types of operations, in agreement with the available electrophysiological data and computer simulations. Differences in the length of branches were also observed between MTC axons of normal and 'barrelless' mice, suggesting that this parameter can be regulated by conditions at the terminal sites.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
V. A. Makarov, K. E. Schmidt, N. P. Castellanos, L. Lopez-Aguado, and G. M. Innocenti
Stimulus-Dependent Interaction between the Visual Areas 17 and 18 of the 2 Hemispheres of the Ferret (Mustela putorius)
Cereb Cortex, August 1, 2008; 18(8): 1951 - 1960.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A. Schuz, D. Chaimow, D. Liewald, and M. Dortenman
Quantitative Aspects of Corticocortical Connections: A Tracer Study in the Mouse
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2006; 16(10): 1474 - 1486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
T. Binzegger, R. J. Douglas, and K. A.C. Martin
Axons in Cat Visual Cortex are Topologically Self-similar
Cereb Cortex, February 1, 2005; 15(2): 152 - 165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
F. Karube, Y. Kubota, and Y. Kawaguchi
Axon Branching and Synaptic Bouton Phenotypes in GABAergic Nonpyramidal Cell Subtypes
J. Neurosci., March 24, 2004; 24(12): 2853 - 2865.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. G. Knyazeva, D. C. Kiper, V. Y. Vildavski, P. A. Despland, M. Maeder-Ingvar, and G. M. Innocenti
Visual Stimulus-Dependent Changes in Interhemispheric EEG Coherence in Humans
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1999; 82(6): 3095 - 3107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.