Skip Navigation


Cerebral Cortex Advance Access originally published online on October 5, 2007
Cerebral Cortex 2008 18(6):1384-1394; doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm171
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/6/1384    most recent
bhm171v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ikkai, A.
Right arrow Articles by Curtis, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ikkai, A.
Right arrow Articles by Curtis, C. E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Cortical Activity Time Locked to the Shift and Maintenance of Spatial Attention

Akiko Ikkai and Clayton E. Curtis

Department of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA

Address correspondence to Clayton E. Curtis, Department of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA. Email: clayton.curtis{at}nyu.edu

Attention increases the gain of visual neurons, which improves visual performance. How attention is controlled, however, remains unknown. Clear correlations between attention and saccade planning indicate that the control of attention is mediated through mechanisms housed in the oculomotor network. Here, we used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging to compare overt and covert attention shifts. Subjects covertly or overtly shifted attention based on an endogenous cue and maintained attention throughout a long and variable delay. To insure continued attention, subjects counted when the attended target dimmed at near-threshold contrast levels. Overt and covert tasks used identical stimuli and required identical motor responses. Additionally, a staircase procedure that adjusted the target-dimming contrast separately for covert and overt trials equated the difficulty between conditions and across subjects. We found that the same regions along the precentral and intraparietal sulci were active during shifts of covert and overt attention. We also found sustained activation in the hemisphere contralateral to the attended visual field. We conclude that maps of prioritized locations are represented in areas classically associated with oculomotor control. The readout of these spatial maps by posterior visual areas directs spatial attention just as the readout by downstream saccade generators directs saccades.

Key Words: attention • control • eye field • fMRI • saccade • salience • spatial


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
Y.-C. Chiu and S. Yantis
A Domain-Independent Source of Cognitive Control for Task Sets: Shifting Spatial Attention and Switching Categorization Rules
J. Neurosci., March 25, 2009; 29(12): 3930 - 3938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.