Skip Navigation


Cerebral Cortex Advance Access originally published online on August 16, 2007
Cerebral Cortex 2008 18(5):979-989; doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm138
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/5/979    most recent
bhm138v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alloway, K. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alloway, K. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Feature Article

Information Processing Streams in Rodent Barrel Cortex: The Differential Functions of Barrel and Septal Circuits

Kevin D. Alloway

Department of Neural and Behavioral Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033-2255, USA

Address correspondence to Dr Kevin D. Alloway, Department of Neural and Behavioral Sciences, H109, Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033-2255, USA. Email: kda1{at}psu.edu.

Rodent somatosensory cortex contains an isomorphic map of the mystacial whiskers in which each whisker is represented by neuronal populations, or barrels, that are separated from each other by intervening septa. Separate afferent pathways convey somatosensory information to the barrels and septa that represent the input stages for 2 partially segregated circuits that extend throughout the other layers of barrel cortex. Whereas the barrel-related circuits process spatiotemporal information generated by whisker contact with external objects, the septa-related circuits encode the frequency and other kinetic features of active whisker movements. The projection patterns from barrel cortex indicate that information processed by the septa-related circuits is used both separately and in combination with information from the barrel-related circuits to mediate specific functions. According to this theory, outputs from the septal processing stream modulate the brain regions that regulate whisking behavior, whereas both processing streams cooperate with each other to identify external stimuli encountered by passive or active whisker movements. This theoretical view prompts several testable hypotheses about the coordination of neuronal activity during whisking behavior. Foremost among these, motor brain regions that control whisker movements are more strongly coordinated with the septa-related circuits than with the barrel-related circuits.

Key Words: columnar organization • rate coding • sensorimotor integration • spatial coding • temporal coding • whisking behavior


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. P. J. de Kock and B. Sakmann
Spiking in primary somatosensory cortex during natural whisking in awake head-restrained rats is cell-type specific
PNAS, September 22, 2009; 106(38): 16446 - 16450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Chakrabarti and K. D. Alloway
Differential Response Patterns in the SI Barrel and Septal Compartments During Mechanical Whisker Stimulation
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1632 - 1646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
C. Giaume, M. Maravall, E. Welker, and G. Bonvento
The Barrel Cortex as a Model to Study Dynamic Neuroglial Interaction
Neuroscientist, August 1, 2009; 15(4): 351 - 366.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
T. Furuta, T. Kaneko, and M. Deschenes
Septal Neurons in Barrel Cortex Derive Their Receptive Field Input from the Lemniscal Pathway
J. Neurosci., April 1, 2009; 29(13): 4089 - 4095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. W. Middleton, A. Longtin, J. Benda, and L. Maler
Postsynaptic Receptive Field Size and Spike Threshold Determine Encoding of High-Frequency Information Via Sensitivity to Synchronous Presynaptic Activity
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2009; 101(3): 1160 - 1170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Ghoshal, P. Pouget, M. Popescu, and F. Ebner
Early Bilateral Sensory Deprivation Blocks the Development of Coincident Discharge in Rat Barrel Cortex
J. Neurosci., February 25, 2009; 29(8): 2384 - 2392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Chakrabarti, M. Zhang, and K. D. Alloway
MI Neuronal Responses to Peripheral Whisker Stimulation: Relationship to Neuronal Activity in SI Barrels and Septa
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 50 - 63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. Bokor, L. Acsady, and M. Deschenes
Vibrissal Responses of Thalamic Cells That Project to the Septal Columns of the Barrel Cortex and to the Second Somatosensory Area
J. Neurosci., May 14, 2008; 28(20): 5169 - 5177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.