Cerebral Cortex Advance Access originally published online on June 14, 2006
Cerebral Cortex 2007 17(5):1033-1046; doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl013
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Evidence for Frontally Mediated Controlled Processing Differences in Older Adults
1 Department of Psychology, Washington University, St Louis, MO 63130, USA, 2 Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA, 3 Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA, 4 Departments of Radiology, 5 Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University, St Louis, MO 63130, USA, 6 Department of Psychology and Center for Brain Science, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
Address correspondence to Randy L Buckner, Harvard University, Department of Psychology, William James Hall, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. rbuckner{at}wjh.harvard.edu.
Advanced aging is associated with slower and less flexible performance on demanding cognitive tasks. Here we used rapid event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging to explore differences between young (n = 65) and older adults (n = 75) during memory retrieval. Methods were optimized to afford exploration of both amplitude and timing differences in neural activity. Although many correlates of retrieval were similar between the groups, including medial and lateral parietal responses to successful recognition, older adults showed increased recruitment of frontal regions relative to young adults when retrieval demanded heavy use of control processes. This effect was not significant during less effortful retrieval. Moreover, the timing of increased recruitment in older adults occurred at relatively late stages of the retrieval event, suggesting a strategy shift. One possibility is that older adults fail to engage appropriate top–down attentional sets at early stages of the retrieval event; as a consequence, frontally mediated processing is extended at late stages to compensate. This strategy shift, which we conceptualize in a framework called the "load-shift" model, may underlie the often observed retention of high-level cognitive function during advanced aging but at the cost of less flexible and slower performance on demanding cognitive tasks.
Key Words: aging • cognitive control • compensation • executive function • fMRI • recognition memory
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. E. Nee and J. Jonides Neural correlates of access to short-term memory PNAS, September 16, 2008; 105(37): 14228 - 14233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Duverne, S. Motamedinia, and M. D. Rugg The Relationship between Aging, Performance, and the Neural Correlates of Successful Memory Encoding Cereb Cortex, July 24, 2008; (2008) bhn122v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. W. Davis, N. A. Dennis, S. M. Daselaar, M. S. Fleck, and R. Cabeza Que PASA? The Posterior-Anterior Shift in Aging Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2008; 18(5): 1201 - 1209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Persson, C. Lustig, J. K. Nelson, and P. A. Reuter-Lorenz Age differences in deactivation: a link to cognitive control? J. Cogn. Neurosci., June 1, 2007; 19(6): 1021 - 1032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|