Skip Navigation


Cerebral Cortex Advance Access originally published online on August 31, 2005
Cerebral Cortex 2006 16(6):827-834; doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj026
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/6/827    most recent
bhj026v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Tanabe, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Tanabe, J. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Functional Dissociation of Attentional Selection within PFC: Response and Non-response Related Aspects of Attentional Selection as Ascertained by fMRI

Xun Liu1, Marie T. Banich1, Benjamin L. Jacobson1 and Jody L. Tanabe2

1 Department of Psychology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA and 2 Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80309-0345, USA

Address correspondence to Xun Liu, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA. Email: xun.liu{at}uky.edu, or to Marie T. Banich, Department of Psychology University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA. Email: mbanich{at}psych.colorado.edu.

In this experiment using a color–word Stroop task, we explored whether different regions of prefrontal cortex bias selection of response-related processes as compared with non-response-related processes. To manipulate demands at the level of response selection, we varied the degree of overlap between stimulus–response mappings in a manual Stroop task. To vary demands at a non-response level, we compared activation for incongruent trials (e.g. the word ‘purple’ in blue ink) that contain two color representations, one in the word and one in the ink color, to neutral trials (e.g. the word ‘drawer’ in blue ink), which contain only one color representation, that in the ink color. These manipulations had differential effects within prefrontal cortex. Both a region of right inferior frontal cortex and caudal regions of the cingulate were sensitive to the selection demands at the response-level and insensitive to demands at the non-response level. In contrast, a more anterior region of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was sensitive to the number of color representations (i.e. incongruent versus neutral trials), but not to the overlap in stimulus–response mappings. Therefore, this study indicates a functional differentiation for implementing attentional control within prefrontal cortex.

Key Words: attention • color-word Stroop task • non-response selection • prefrontal cortex • response selection


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H.-C. Leung and W. Cai
Common and Differential Ventrolateral Prefrontal Activity during Inhibition of Hand and Eye Movements
J. Neurosci., September 12, 2007; 27(37): 9893 - 9900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
X. Liu, H. Wang, C. R. Corbly, J. Zhang, and J. E. Joseph
The Involvement of the Inferior Parietal Cortex in the Numerical Stroop Effect and the Distance Effect in a Two-digit Number Comparison Task.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., September 1, 2006; 18(9): 1518 - 1530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.