Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sakai, K. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sakai, K. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 13, No. 5, 517-526, May 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press

An Event-related fMRI Study of Explicit Syntactic Processing of Normal/Anomalous Sentences in Contrast to Implicit Syntactic Processing

Kei Suzuki1 and Kuniyoshi L. Sakai1,2

1 Department of Cognitive and Behavioral Science, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 3-8-1 Komaba, Tokyo and , 2 CREST, JST, Kawaguchi-shi, Japan

Using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we examined activation of cortical language areas for explicit syntactic processing. In a syntactic decision (Syn) task, the participants judged whether the presented sentence was syntac- tically correct, where syntactic knowledge about the distinction between transitive and intransitive verbs was required. In a semantic decision (Sem) task, lexico-semantic knowledge about selectional restrictions was indispensable. In a phonological decision (Pho) task, phonological knowledge about accent patterns was required. The Sem and Pho tasks involved implicit syntactic processing, as well as explicit semantic and phonological pro- cessing, respectively. We also tested a voice-pitch comparison (Voi) task in which no explicit linguistic knowledge was required. In the direct comparison of Syn – (Sem + Pho + Voi), we found localized activation in the left inferior frontal gyrus (F3op/F3t), indicating that activation of the left F3op/F3t is more prominently enhanced in explicit syntactic processing than in implicit syntactic processing. Moreover, we determined that its activation is selective to syntactic judgments regarding both normal and anomalous sentences. These results suggest that explicit information processing in the syntactic domain critically involves the left F3op/F3t, which is functionally separable from other regions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ScienceHome page
K. L. Sakai
Language Acquisition and Brain Development
Science, November 4, 2005; 310(5749): 815 - 819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BrainHome page
K. L. Sakai, Y. Tatsuno, K. Suzuki, H. Kimura, and Y. Ichida
Sign and speech: amodal commonality in left hemisphere dominance for comprehension of sentences
Brain, June 1, 2005; 128(6): 1407 - 1417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
Y. Tatsuno and K. L. Sakai
Language-Related Activations in the Left Prefrontal Regions Are Differentially Modulated by Age, Proficiency, and Task Demands
J. Neurosci., February 16, 2005; 25(7): 1637 - 1644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cereb CortexHome page
K. L. Sakai, K. Miura, N. Narafu, and Y. Muraishi
Correlated Functional Changes of the Prefrontal Cortex in Twins Induced by Classroom Education of Second Language
Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2004; 14(11): 1233 - 1239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.