Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roerig, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kao, J. P.-Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roerig, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kao, J. P.-Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 13, No. 4, 350-363, April 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press

Different Inhibitory Synaptic Input Patterns in Excitatory and Inhibitory Layer 4 Neurons of Ferret Visual Cortex

Birgit Roerig, Bingzhong Chen and Joseph P.-Y. Kao1

Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology and , 1 Medical Biotechnology Center and Department of Physiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA

Address correspondence to Birgit Roerig, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Medical School, University of Maryland at Baltimore, 685 West Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD 21201-1509, USA. Email: broer001{at}umaryland.edu.

The synaptic mechanisms underlying the generation of orientation and direction selectivity in layer 4 of the primary visual cortex are still largely unclear. Previous in vivo work has shown that intra-cortical inhibition plays a major role in generating the properties of orientation and direction selectivity. Excitatory and inhibitory cortical neurons differ in their receptive field properties: excitatory neurons tend to be orientation- and direction-selective, inhibitory neurons tend to be orientation-, but not direction-selective. Here we have compared the relationship between direction preference maps recorded in vivo and synaptic input maps recorded in vitro from excitatory and inhibitory stellate cells in layer 4 of ferret visual cortex. Our goal was to test whether the differences in direction tuning between these cell populations might result from different inhibitory connectivity patterns. We found that excitatory neurons, which are direction tuned in vivo, receive ~50% of their inhibitory inputs from cortical regions of opposite direction preference whereas inhibitory cells, which are not or poorly direction tuned, receive only very few inputs from regions of opposite direction preference. This confirms that inhibitory connections arising in cortical regions of opposite direction preference may be required to create or strengthen direction tuning in their target neurons. Thus, differences in intracortical inhibitory circuit patterns may underlie the differences in receptive field properties observed between excitatory and inhibitory neurons in vivo.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
N.V. Povysheva, G. Gonzalez-Burgos, A.V. Zaitsev, S. Kroner, G. Barrionuevo, D.A. Lewis, and L.S. Krimer
Properties of Excitatory Synaptic Responses in Fast-spiking Interneurons and Pyramidal Cells from Monkey and Rat Prefrontal Cortex
Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2006; 16(4): 541 - 552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. Kida, S. Shimegi, and H. Sato
Similarity of Direction Tuning Among Responses to Stimulation of Different Whiskers in Neurons of Rat Barrel Cortex
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2005; 94(3): 2004 - 2018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.