Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, K. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller, K. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 13, No. 1, 73-82, January 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press

Understanding Layer 4 of the Cortical Circuit: A Model Based on Cat V1

Kenneth D. Miller

Departments of Physiology and Otolaryngology, W.M. Keck Center for Integrative Neuroscience, Sloan-Swartz Center for Theoretical Neurobiology at UCSF, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143–0444, USA

Address correspondence to: Kenneth Miller, Department of Physiology, University of California at San Francisco, 513 Parnassus, San Francisco, CA 94143–0444, USA. Email: ken{at}phy.ucsf.edu.

This paper reviews theoretical and experimental results on the processing of layer 4, the input-recipient layer, of cat primary visual cortex (V1). A wide range of experimental data can be understood from a model in which response tuning of layer 4 cells is largely determined by a local interplay of feedforward excitation (from thalamus) and feedforward inhibition (from layer 4 inhibitory interneurons driven by thalamus). Feedforward inhibition dominates excitation, inherits its tuning from the thalamic input and sharpens the tuning of excitatory cells. At least a strong component of the feedforward inhibition received by a cell is spatially opponent to the excitation it receives, meaning that inhibition is driven by dark in regions of the visual field in which excitation is driven by light, and vice versa. The idea of opponent inhibition can be generalized to mean inhibition driven by input patterns that are strongly anti-correlated with the patterns that excite a cell. This paper argues that dominant feedforward opponent inhibition may be a general principle of cortical layer 4. This leads to the suggestion that the properties that show columnar organization – invariance across the vertical depth of cortex – may be properties that are shared by ‘opposite’ (anticorrelated) stimulus pairs. This contrasts with the more common idea that a column represents a set of cells that all share similar stimulus preferences.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. A. Atencio and C. E. Schreiner
Spectrotemporal Processing Differences between Auditory Cortical Fast-Spiking and Regular-Spiking Neurons
J. Neurosci., April 9, 2008; 28(15): 3897 - 3910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. A. Cardin, L. A. Palmer, and D. Contreras
Stimulus Feature Selectivity in Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons in Primary Visual Cortex
J. Neurosci., September 26, 2007; 27(39): 10333 - 10344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. Soto, N. Kopell, and K. Sen
Network Architecture, Receptive Fields, and Neuromodulation: Computational and Functional Implications of Cholinergic Modulation in Primary Auditory Cortex
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 2972 - 2983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. J. Rose and R. Metherate
Auditory Thalamocortical Transmission Is Reliable and Temporally Precise
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2005; 94(3): 2019 - 2030.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J.-M. Alonso and H. A. Swadlow
Thalamocortical Specificity and the Synthesis of Sensory Cortical Receptive Fields
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 26 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
D. Xing, D. L. Ringach, R. Shapley, and M. J Hawken
Correlation of local and global orientation and spatial frequency tuning in macaque V1
J. Physiol., June 15, 2004; 557(3): 923 - 933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. J. Alitto and W. M. Usrey
Influence of Contrast on Orientation and Temporal Frequency Tuning in Ferret Primary Visual Cortex
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2004; 91(6): 2797 - 2808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Elhilali, J. B. Fritz, D. J. Klein, J. Z. Simon, and S. A. Shamma
Dynamics of Precise Spike Timing in Primary Auditory Cortex
J. Neurosci., February 4, 2004; 24(5): 1159 - 1172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Beierlein, J. R. Gibson, and B. W. Connors
Two Dynamically Distinct Inhibitory Networks in Layer 4 of the Neocortex
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2003; 90(5): 2987 - 3000.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.