Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salat, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Janowsky, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salat, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Janowsky, J. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 12, No. 5, 494-505, May 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press

Greater Orbital Prefrontal Volume Selectively Predicts Worse Working Memory Performance in Older Adults

David H. Salat1,4, Jeffrey A. Kaye2,3 and Jeri S. Janowsky1,2

1 Department of Behavioral Neuroscience, , 2 Department of Neurology and , 3 Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Oregon Health Sciences University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97201-3098, USA

David H. Salat, MGH-NMR Center, Department of Radiology, Building 149, 13th Street, Mail Code 149 (2301), Charlestown, MA 02129-2060, USA. EMail: salat{at}nmr.mgh.harvard.edu.

Alterations of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) could contribute to cognitive decline in older adults. We examined the specificity of age-related PFC degeneration and whether cognitive abilities were related to volumetric measurements. Older and younger subjects were tested using a battery of tasks supported by different subregions within the PFC. The cognitive data from older subjects were related to PFC volumetric measurements in order to determine whether cortical morphology was predictive of individual differences in task performance within this age range (72–94 years). Working memory performance best distinguished older from younger subjects. Working memory measures but not other measures were correlated with age in both groups. A larger orbital PFC volume was related to a worse working memory performance and a larger superior PFC volume was related to worse conditional association learning. The volumes of these regions were not related to performance on other tasks. These results suggest that working memory is a sensitive measure of cognitive aging and that regional morphology is associated with specific cognitive abilities in older adults.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Learn. Mem.Home page
J. A. Weiler, C. Bellebaum, and I. Daum
Aging affects acquisition and reversal of reward-based associative learning
Learn. Mem., April 1, 2008; 15(4): 190 - 197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. R. Milad, B. T. Quinn, R. K. Pitman, S. P. Orr, B. Fischl, and S. L. Rauch
Thickness of ventromedial prefrontal cortex in humans is correlated with extinction memory
PNAS, July 26, 2005; 102(30): 10706 - 10711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
K. B. Walhovd, A. M. Fjell, I. Reinvang, A. Lundervold, B. Fischl, B. T. Quinn, and A. M. Dale
Size does matter in the long run: Hippocampal and cortical volume predict recall across weeks
Neurology, October 12, 2004; 63(7): 1193 - 1197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
D. H. Salat, R. L. Buckner, A. Z. Snyder, D. N. Greve, R. S.R. Desikan, E. Busa, J. C. Morris, A. M. Dale, and B. Fischl
Thinning of the Cerebral Cortex in Aging
Cereb Cortex, July 1, 2004; 14(7): 721 - 730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.