Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 12, No. 3, 318-328,
March 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press
Top-down Controlled Visual Dimension Weighting: An Event-related fMRI Study
1 Department of Experimental Psychology and , 2 Day Clinic of Cognitive Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, , 3 Department of Neurology, Max-Planck-Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig and , 4 Department of Psychology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
Ralph Weidner, Tagesklinik für kognitive Neurologie, Universität Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 22a, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany. Email: weidner{at}uni-leipzig.de.
Target detection in visual singleton feature search is slowed when consecutive targets are defined in different visual dimensions. Behavioral data provide evidence that attentional weight needs to be shifted between dimension-specific processing modules. We found similar dimension-specific change effects in a conjunction search task, in which observers searched for an odd-one-out target defined by a unique combination of size and color or, respectively, size and motion direction. Changes of the secondary target dimension (color or motion) across trials, but not target feature changes within a dimension, increased the time required to detect the target. Dimensional change costs were greatly increased for singleton conjunction search compared to singleton feature search. This suggests involvement of top-down control processes in dimensional change in conjunction search, in contrast to stimulus-driven dimensional change in singleton feature search. The functional anatomical correlates of top-down controlled visual dimension changes were investigated in two event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiments. In Experiment 1, dimensional change in singleton conjunction search was accompanied by transient activations in a fronto-posterior network of brain areas that was largely non-overlapping with the general network activated during visual search. Experiment 2, which contrasted singleton feature and conjunction search within the same session, revealed a double dissociation in anterior prefrontal cortex: left frontopolar cortex was selectively involved in stimulus-driven dimension changes but not in top-down controlled dimension changes, whereas the reverse was observed in frontomedian cortex.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Kristjansson, A. Bjarnason, A. B. Hjaltason, and B. G. Stefansdottir Priming of luminance-defined motion direction in visual search Atten Percept Psychophys, July 1, 2009; 71(5): 1027 - 1041. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. H. Nuechterlein, S. J. Luck, C. Lustig, and M. Sarter CNTRICS Final Task Selection: Control of Attention Schizophr Bull, January 1, 2009; 35(1): 182 - 196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. J. Gilbert, S. Spengler, J. S. Simons, C. D. Frith, and P. W. Burgess Differential Functions of Lateral and Medial Rostral Prefrontal Cortex (Area 10) Revealed by Brain-Behavior Associations Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2006; 16(12): 1783 - 1789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Konishi, J. Chikazoe, K. Jimura, T. Asari, and Y. Miyashita Neural mechanism in anterior prefrontal cortex for inhibition of prolonged set interference PNAS, August 30, 2005; 102(35): 12584 - 12588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|