Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 11, No. 9, 796-805,
September 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press
Neural Correlates of Dual Task Interference Can be Dissociated from Those of Divided Attention: an fMRI Study
1 Division of Human Brain Research, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm 171 77, Sweden, , 2 Department of Physiology, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia and , 3 Institut für Medizin, Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, D-52425 Juelich, Germany
When people perform two tasks simultaneously, the tasks are often executed slower and with more errors than when they are carried out as single tasks. This is called dual task interference. With functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we show that concurrently performed visual and somatosensory reaction time (RT) tasks engage almost identical volumes of cortical and subcortical motor structures. Moreover, dual RT tasks engaged additional cortical regions that are not activated by the component RT tasks had they been performed as single tasks. When the inter-stimulus interval was <300 ms, the first task interfered with the second, and a field in the right inferior frontal gyrus (RIFG) appeared with activity correlated with the increased RT to the second stimulus. This activation was spatially distinct from the cortical activity of the main effect of dual task performance. Thus, the performance of single RT tasks, dual RT tasks and dual RT tasks that interfere differ psychophysically and in the brain structures subserving these tasks. A short occupancy of the common motor structures can explain the interference effect. The increased activity of the RIFG correlated with the interference effect is very likely to be a specific outcome of situations where two concurrent tasks interfere with each other. The brain appears to recruit the RIFG for a subsequent (delayed) response when there is interference between dual tasks.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T. L. ANSARI, N. DERAKSHAN, and A. RICHARDS Effects of anxiety on task switching: Evidence from the mixed antisaccade task Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, September 1, 2008; 8(3): 229 - 238. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 U. Ettinger, D. H. ffytche, V. Kumari, N. Kathmann, B. Reuter, F. Zelaya, and S. C. R. Williams Decomposing the Neural Correlates of Antisaccade Eye Movements Using Event-Related fMRI Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2008; 18(5): 1148 - 1159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. E.J. Linden The Working Memory Networks of the Human Brain Neuroscientist, June 1, 2007; 13(3): 257 - 267. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T.W Robbins Shifting and stopping: fronto-striatal substrates, neurochemical modulation and clinical implications Phil Trans R Soc B, May 29, 2007; 362(1481): 917 - 932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. I. Erickson, S. J. Colcombe, R. Wadhwa, L. Bherer, M. S. Peterson, P. E. Scalf, J. S. Kim, M. Alvarado, and A. F. Kramer Training-Induced Functional Activation Changes in Dual-Task Processing: An fMRI Study Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2007; 17(1): 192 - 204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|