Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ajemian, R.
Right arrow Articles by Grossberg, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ajemian, R.
Right arrow Articles by Grossberg, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 11, No. 12, 1124-1135, December 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press

A Model of Movement Coordinates in the Motor Cortex: Posture-dependent Changes in the Gain and Direction of Single Cell Tuning Curves

Robert Ajemian, Daniel Bullock and Stephen Grossberg

Department of Cognitive and Neural Systems, and Center for Adaptive Systems, Boston University, 677 Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02215, USA

Daniel Bullock or Stephen Grossberg, Department of Cognitive and Neural Systems, Boston University, 677 Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02215, USA. Email: danb{at}cns.bu.edu or steve{at}cns.bu.edu.

This article outlines a methodology for investigating the coordinate systems by which movement variables are encoded in the firing rates of individual motor cortical neurons. Recent neurophysiological experiments have probed the issue of underlying coordinates by examining how cellular preferred directions (as determined by the center-out task) change with posture. Several key experimental findings have resulted that constrain hypotheses about how motor cortical cells encode movement information. But while the significance of shifts in preferred direction is well known and widely accepted, posture-dependent changes in the depth of modulation of a cell's tuning curve — that is, gain changes — have not been similarly identified as a means of coordinate inference. This article develops a vector field framework in which the preferred direction and the gain of a cell's tuning curve are viewed as dual components of a unitary response vector. The formalism can be used to compute how each aspect of cell response covaries with posture as a function of the coordinate system in which a given cell is hypothesized to encode its movement information. Such an integrated approach leads to a model of motor cortical cell activity that codifies the following four observations: (i) cell activity correlates with hand movement direction; (ii) cell activity correlates with hand movement speed; (iii) preferred directions vary with posture; and (iv) the modulation depth of tuning curves varies with posture. Finally, the model suggests general methods for testing coordinate hypotheses at the single-cell level and simulates an example protocol for three possible coordinate systems: Cartesian spatial, shoulder-centered, and joint angle.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Deneve, J.-R. Duhamel, and A. Pouget
Optimal Sensorimotor Integration in Recurrent Cortical Networks: A Neural Implementation of Kalman Filters
J. Neurosci., May 23, 2007; 27(21): 5744 - 5756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
C.D. Vargas, E. Olivier, L. Craighero, L. Fadiga, J.R. Duhamel, and A. Sirigu
The Influence of Hand Posture on Corticospinal Excitability during Motor Imagery: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study
Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2004; 14(11): 1200 - 1206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.