Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (52)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dombrowski, S.M.
Right arrow Articles by Barbas, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dombrowski, S.M.
Right arrow Articles by Barbas, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 11, No. 10, 975-988, October 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press

Quantitative Architecture Distinguishes Prefrontal Cortical Systems in the Rhesus Monkey

S.M. Dombrowski, C.C. Hilgetag1 and H. Barbas1,2,3

Departments of Behavioral Neuroscience and , 1 Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, , 2 Department of Health Sciences, Boston University, 635 Commonwealth Ave., #431, Boston MA, 02218 and , 3 New England Regional Primate Research Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

Address correspondence to H. Barbas, Boston University, 635 Commonwealth Ave., Room 431, Boston, MA 02215, USA. Email: barbas{at}bu.edu

The prefrontal cortex encompasses a large and heterogeneous set of areas, whose borders have been variously mapped in different architectonic studies. Differences in cortical maps present a formidable problem in comparing data across studies and in constructing databanks on the connections and functional attributes of cortical areas. Here we used quantitative approaches to cortical mapping to investigate (i) if architectonic areas of the prefrontal cortex in adult rhesus monkeys have unique profiles and (ii) if groups of architectonic areas belonging to distinct cortical types, ranging from agranular to eulaminate, have similar features. In addition, we used multidimensional analyses to see if, and how, prefrontal areas form clusters when multiple features are considered simultaneously. We used quantitative unbiased sampling procedures to estimate the areal and laminar density of neurons, glia and neurons positive for the calcium binding proteins parvalbumin (PV), calbindin (CB) and calretinin (CR) among 21 prefrontal areas or subdivisions of areas. Neuronal density varied among the prefrontal cortices (range: 38 569 ± 4078 to 58 708 ± 2327 neurons/mm3); it was lowest in caudal orbitofrontal and medial areas (OPAll, OPro, 13, 24a, 32, M25) and highest in lateral prefrontal areas (subdivisions of areas 46 and 8). Neurons positive for PV were most prevalent in lateral prefrontal areas and least prevalent in caudal orbitofrontal and medial pre-frontal areas, whereas the opposite trend was noted for neurons that expressed CB. Neurons positive for CR did not show regional differences, and the density of glia showed small variations among prefrontal cortices. The differences among areas, along with differences in the thickness of individual areas and layers, were used to establish a quantitative profile for each area. The results showed that differences in the density of neurons, and the preponderance of neurons positive for PV and CB, were related to different architectonic types of areas found within the prefrontal cortex. Conventional as well as multiparameter statistical analyses distinguished at one extreme the agranular and dysgranular (limbic) cortices, which were characterized by prominent deep layers (V–VI), the lowest neuronal density, the highest ratio of glia/neurons, and the lowest density of PV and the highest for CB. At the other extreme, lateral eulaminate cortices were characterized by the highest density of neurons, a prominent granular layer IV, denser supragranular (II–III) than infragranular (V–VI) layers, and a balanced distribution of neurons positive for PV and CB. The results provide insights into potentially different rates of development or maturation of limbic and eulaminate prefrontal areas, and their differential vulnerability in neurological and psychiatric diseases. The quantitative methods used provide an objective approach to construct maps, address differences in nomenclature across studies, establish homologies in different species and provide a baseline to identify changes in pathologic conditions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
F. Kurth, S. B. Eickhoff, A. Schleicher, L. Hoemke, K. Zilles, and K. Amunts
Cytoarchitecture and Probabilistic Maps of the Human Posterior Insular Cortex
Cereb Cortex, October 12, 2009; (2009) bhp208v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
H. Barbas and B. Zikopoulos
The Prefrontal Cortex and Flexible Behavior
Neuroscientist, October 1, 2007; 13(5): 532 - 545.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
M Medalla, P Lera, M Feinberg, and H Barbas
Specificity in Inhibitory Systems Associated with Prefrontal Pathways to Temporal Cortex in Primates
Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2007; 17(suppl_1): i136 - i150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
C. N. Vidal, J. L. Rapoport, K. M. Hayashi, J. A. Geaga, Y. Sui, L. E. McLemore, Y. Alaghband, J. N. Giedd, P. Gochman, J. Blumenthal, et al.
Dynamically Spreading Frontal and Cingulate Deficits Mapped in Adolescents With Schizophrenia
Arch Gen Psychiatry, January 1, 2006; 63(1): 25 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
H. Barbas, M. Medalla, O. Alade, J. Suski, B. Zikopoulos, and P. Lera
Relationship of Prefrontal Connections to Inhibitory Systems in Superior Temporal Areas in the Rhesus Monkey
Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2005; 15(9): 1356 - 1370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A.V. Zaitsev, G. Gonzalez-Burgos, N.V. Povysheva, S. Kroner, D.A. Lewis, and L.S. Krimer
Localization of Calcium-binding Proteins in Physiologically and Morphologically Characterized Interneurons of Monkey Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex
Cereb Cortex, August 1, 2005; 15(8): 1178 - 1186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
N. Ichinohe and K. S. Rockland
Region Specific Micromodularity in the Uppermost Layers in Primate Cerebral Cortex
Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2004; 14(11): 1173 - 1184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
J. Vezoli, A. Falchier, B. Jouve, K. Knoblauch, M. Young, and H. Kennedy
Quantitative Analysis of Connectivity in the Visual Cortex: Extracting Function from Structure
Neuroscientist, October 1, 2004; 10(5): 476 - 482.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Behav Cogn Neurosci RevHome page
L. K. Fellows
The Cognitive Neuroscience of Human Decision Making: A Review and Conceptual Framework
Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, September 1, 2004; 3(3): 159 - 172.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
X.-J. Wang, J. Tegner, C. Constantinidis, and P. S. Goldman-Rakic
Division of labor among distinct subtypes of inhibitory neurons in a cortical microcircuit of working memory
PNAS, February 3, 2004; 101(5): 1368 - 1373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
G. N. Elston
Cortex, Cognition and the Cell: New Insights into the Pyramidal Neuron and Prefrontal Function
Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2003; 13(11): 1124 - 1138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
R. D. S. Raizada and S. Grossberg
Towards a Theory of the Laminar Architecture of Cerebral Cortex: Computational Clues from the Visual System
Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2003; 13(1): 100 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.