Cerebral Cortex Advance Access originally published online on June 8, 2007
Cerebral Cortex 2008 18(2):371-378; doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm062
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cortical Gamma Generators Suggest Abnormal Auditory Circuitry in Early-Onset Psychosis
1 Magnetoencephalography Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, NC 27103, USA, 2 Neuromagnetic Imaging Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado, Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80262, USA
Address correspondence to Tony W. Wilson, Ph.D., Magnetoencephalography Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA. Email: Tony.W.Wilson{at}gmail.com.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Neurobiological theories of schizophrenia and related psychoses have increasingly emphasized impaired neuronal coordination (i.e., dysfunctional connectivity) as central to the pathophysiology. Although neuroimaging evidence has mostly corroborated these accounts, the basic mechanism(s) of reduced functional connectivity remains elusive. In this study, we examine the developmental trajectory and underlying mechanism(s) of dysfunctional connectivity by using gamma oscillatory power as an index of local and long-range circuit integrity. An early-onset psychosis group and a matched cohort of typically developing adolescents listened to monaurally presented click-trains, as whole-head magnetoencephalography data were acquired. Consistent with previous work, gamma-band power was significantly higher in right auditory cortices across groups and conditions. However, patients exhibited significantly reduced overall gamma power relative to controls, and showed a reduced ear-of-stimulation effect indicating that ipsi- versus contralateral presentation had less impact on hemispheric power. Gamma-frequency oscillations are thought to be dependent on gamma-aminobutyric acidergic interneuronal networks, thus these patients' impairment in generating and/or maintaining such activity may indicate that local circuit integrity is at least partially compromised early in the disease process. In addition, patients also showed abnormality in long-range networks (i.e., ear-of-stimulation effects) potentially suggesting that multiple stages along auditory pathways contribute to connectivity aberrations found in patients with psychosis.
Key Words: 40 Hz bipolar connectivity magnetoencephalography MEG schizophrenia
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recent neuroimaging investigations have increasingly supported models positing disruption in system-level neuronal coordination (i.e., dysfunctional connectivity) as central to the underlying neurobiology of schizophrenia and other psychoses. Such models are also consistent with cognitive descriptions of psychosis, as the integration impairments found in various sensorimotor tasks and across all sensory modalities (Hemsley 1996
Although pathological emphasis clearly differs amongst theoretical accounts of dysfunctional connectivity, current evidence concerning the underlying mechanism(s) is equally congruent with a variety of positions. On a generic level, the emergent phenomena of dysfunctional connectivity could be mediated by deficient white matter tracts between network elements (i.e., structural deficits), reduced utilization or fidelity of structurally normal neuronal tracts (i.e., purely functional deficits), or a combination of both structural and functional pathologies. Outside of the callosal area (Woodruff et al. 1995
; Buchsbaum et al. 2006
), evidence for white matter tract abnormalities in schizophrenia and related psychoses is not remarkable. The increasing employment of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) should eventually yield decisive evidence on this point, but thus far applicable studies have reported mostly negative findings without truly consistent positive findings across studies (Kanaan et al. 2005
; Kubicki et al. 2007
). Essentially, for any brain region where abnormalities have been found in studies of schizophrenia, at least as many other comparable DTI studies have reported negative results for the same neural region (Kanaan et al. 2005
). By contrast, data supportive of functional connectivity deficits in psychosis are widespread in the literature. Initial evidence emerged through correlating interregional activation magnitudes using positron-emission tomography, with adult patients exhibiting reduced functional connectivity amongst prefrontal and superior temporal regions, along with abnormally enhanced connectivity between posterior middle temporal and prefrontal cortices (Friston et al. 1996
). More recently, several groups have found corroborating evidence of abnormal connectivity in psychosis by correlating the voxel time series of functional-magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. For example, Honey et al. (2005)
observed reduced functional connectivity during a continuous performance task between medial superior frontal gyri and both cerebellar and anterior cingulate cortices. Lawrie et al. (2002)
showed that auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia patients were associated with reduced fronto-temporal connectivity during a sentence completion task, whereas Boksman et al. (2005)
demonstrated widespread unfocused interactions amongst right anterior cingulate and bilateral brain regions in a similar group of patients using a word fluency task. In controls, word fluency only elicited robust and highly localized interactions between right anterior cingulate and language-related areas of left temporal cortices (Boksman et al. 2005
). Lastly, a recent whole-brain analysis of functional connectivity during rest indicated a distributed widespread pattern of reduced neuronal interactions in patients with psychosis, suggesting aberrant connectivity may not be restricted to circumscribed areas or specific brain regions (Liang et al. 2006
).
Thus, substantial evidence implicates a predominantly functional connectivity disturbance in patients with psychosis. However, the neural mechanism(s) underlying or inducing such interregional interactions in the healthy brain, as well as their putative dysfunction in disease, remains an open question. Some have suggested that synchronous gamma oscillations may mediate interactions amongst elements of actively processing systems, by integrating the disparate aspects of stimulus processing performed by diverse regions of a distributed neural system (Singer and Gray 1995
; Engel et al. 1997
). This would imply gamma-frequency oscillations are necessary or perhaps even inducing functional connectivity patterns observed in hemodynamic studies, and that abnormal neural interactions associated with psychosis could be a mere consequence of fundamental deficits in gamma-band neuronal activity (Lee et al. 2003a
). Several electroencephalography studies recently demonstrated reduced gamma activity and/or synchrony in chronic psychosis as well as first-episode schizophrenia, thus supporting the notion of impaired high-frequency cortical oscillations (Kwon et al. 1999
; Lee et al. 2003b
; Spencer et al. 2003
, 2004
; Symond et al. 2005
). Furthermore, post-mortem studies of psychosis patients have shown a 40% selective decrease (statistically unrelated to medication) in the axon terminal density of gamma-aminobutyric acidergic (GABA-ergic) interneurons that synapse exclusively with pyramidal cells (Pierri et al. 1999
). Such local networks of inhibitory interneurons are thought to be critical substrates for the production and maintenance of gamma oscillations, as they are known to function as GABA-gated pacemakers for neocortical oscillatory activity (Bragin et al. 1995
; Whittington et al. 1995
; Traub et al. 1996
; Grothe and Klump 2000
; Bartos et al. 2002
; Porjesz et al. 2002
).
In the current study, we investigated dysfunctional connectivity by focusing on auditory magnetic steady-state responses (SSR) in a group of normal adolescents and a group with early-onset psychoses. Participants in our patient group had a diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar disorder with psychotic features. Pooling across specific diagnoses is justified in the sense that there are likely biological markers shared in common among specific manifestations of psychosis which relate more directly to psychosis (e.g., positive symptoms) than to other phenotypes (e.g., negative symptoms, mood instability). Indeed, evidence has shown that the age of achievement of early developmental milestones such as standing, walking, and potty training is predictive of both schizophreniform and nonschizophreniform psychosis later in life (Isohanni et al. 2001
). Data have further shown that early-onset psychotic, but not nonpsychotic mood disorders are associated with delays in language, social, and/or motor development (Sigurdsson et al. 1999
). Thus, by comparing across diagnoses, we aim to illuminate neurobiological correlates of psychosis which, unlike the unique symptomatology, are shared amongst disorders represented in our patient group.
To this end, we localized bilateral neural generators of the 40-Hz SSR and performed time–frequency analyses on the single-trial time series of each source to quantify gamma-band power elicited by a series of pulse trains (40/s) presented monaurally to each ear. The auditory SSR is most often elicited by trains of clicks or amplitude-modulated tones, and substantial evidence suggests that 40-Hz modulation rates evoke the strongest SSR in humans (Stapells et al. 1984
; Hari et al. 1989
; Boettcher et al. 2001
, 2002
). Prior studies have also indicated that the magnetic 40-Hz SSR localizes to primary auditory cortices (Pantev et al. 1996
; Engelien et al. 2000
; Teale et al. 2003
). Based on the theoretical relationship between gamma oscillations and dysfunctional connectivity, we hypothesized that adolescents with psychosis would exhibit reduced SSR gamma power bilaterally relative to age- and gender-matched controls. Although a decrease in high-frequency activity would implicate local dysfunction in GABA-ergic interneuronal networks, we also examined long-range circuitry by computing an ear-of-stimulation index per hemisphere that directly reflected 40-Hz power fluctuations associated with the ear stimulated.
| Methods and Materials |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subject Selection
We studied 10 adolescents with psychosis (7 males) and 10 typically developing controls (4 males). The 2 groups did not differ statistically in education, sex, full-scale IQ, parental socioeconomic status, age at magnetoencephalography (MEG) scan, or handedness. Additional demographic information is provided in Table 1. In the psychosis group, 3 patients were diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder, 3 with bipolar I disorder (with psychotic features), and the remaining 4 had schizophrenia. All patients were in outpatient treatment. At the time of study, one patient was unmedicated, one was taking only a psychostimulant, and 8 were taking multiple medications at least one of which was an atypical antipsychotic. Upon entering the study, all participants in the psychotic group were rediagnosed using the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children—Present and Lifetime Version (Kaufman et al. 1997
), and a review of medical records. Exclusionary criteria included any medical illness affecting central nervous system function, confounding-dual diagnoses, neurological disorder, history of head trauma, and current substance abuse. Comparison subjects met the same exclusionary criteria, but had no history of Axis I disorder or first-degree relatives with an Axis I diagnosis; all were recruited from the local community. Informed consent was obtained in accord with guidelines of the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board.
|
Experimental Paradigm
Monaural trains consisting of 2-ms duration biphasic pulses were delivered every 25 ms for a total of 500 ms, as measured at the earpiece. These pulse trains were repeated every 1.5 s until >200 trials per ear had been collected. All stimuli were produced using E.A.R. TONE 3A (Cabot Safety Corporation, Indianapolis, IN) transducers with 6.25 m of polyurethane tubing (4.75 mm internal diameter) and foam earpiece inserts with 30 dB attenuation to exterior noise. Sound amplitude was 80-dB sound pressure level (SPL) as measured by a Bruel & Kjaer 2209 SPL meter and 4157 artificial ear. Throughout the paradigm, participants watched a silent video to promote a consistent state of alertness while supine in a magnetically shielded room (MSR).
Data Acquisition
With an acquisition bandwidth of 0.1–200 Hz, neuromagnetic responses were sampled in epoch mode at 678 Hz using a Magnes 3600 WH equipped with 248 first-order axial-gradiometers (4-D Neuroimaging, San Diego, CA). Each epoch was of 1000-ms duration, including a 200-ms prestimulus baseline. All MEG data were subjected to a global noise filter subtracting the external, nonbiological noise obtained through the MEG reference channels, and stowed for offline analyses.
Prior to MEG measurement, 5 coils were attached to the subject's head and the locations of these coils, together with the 3 fiducial points and scalp surface, were determined with a 3-D digitizer (Fastrak 3SF0002, Polhemus Navigator Sciences, Colchester, VT). Once the subject was positioned inside the MSR, an electric current was fed to the coils. This induced a measurable magnetic field and allowed the coils to be localized in reference to the sensors. Because coil locations were also known in head coordinates, all MEG measurements could be transformed into a common coordinate system. With this coordinate system (including the scalp surface points) we coregistered each participant's MEG data with their structural T1-weighted MRI data (for MR acquisition parameters, see Rojas et al. 2005
) using the BrainVoyager 2000 software (Version 4.9; Brain Innovations, The Netherlands).
MEG Source Analyses
Artifact rejection was based on a fixed threshold method (MEG level > 1.2 pT), supplemented with visual inspection. Artifact-free epochs from each condition were time-domain averaged and then digitally (forward/backward Butterworth) bandpass-filtered 35–45 Hz to emphasize the 40-Hz SSR (Kwon et al. 1999
; Ross et al. 2002
; Teale et al. 2003
). For each participant, an equivalent-current-dipole (ECD) was used to model the neural generator of the contralateral 40-Hz response in each condition (i.e., left ear, right ear). To this end, contour maps were used to identify the subset of sensors covering both magnetic flux extrema of the SSR, which is the most prominent auditory response from 200- to 500-ms poststimulus elicited with this paradigm. Using this subset of sensors, we derived a temporal window of 25 ms duration centered on the maximum global field power (GFP) measurement of the SSR between 200- to 500-ms poststimulus. The GFP indicates the sum of squares of the magnetic measurements over the subset of sensors for each data point in the averaged and bandpass-filtered epoch. A spatiotemporal dipole-fit was then performed on the neural generator contralateral to acoustic stimulation using the Downhill-Simplex optimization algorithm (with 5 simplex turns) and a spherically symmetric conductor model. To be accepted as reliable, the resulting ECD solution had to meet the 0.90 goodness-of-fit criterion.
These dipoles were then combined into a single 2-source model for each participant, which was used to calculate an inverse spatial filter for deriving source waveforms for each trial of the raw MEG time series. This operation, termed source space projection (Tesche et al. 1995
; Ross et al. 2000
), exploits the distinct sensitivity profile possessed by each element of the 248-sensor array to activity in a prespecified cortical patch (determined from the above described localizations), and thereby utilizes the raw field strength measurements across the array to calculate single waveforms per source indicating the current-strength (in nAm) time series within the specific tissue volume. In the current application, this procedure generated 2 source waveforms (i.e., a contralateral and ipsilateral generator) for each condition per participant. Previous investigations using beamformer approaches, which do not require a priori assumptions regarding source configurations, have demonstrated single-dipoles to be sufficient for modeling the activation of auditory cortices (e.g., Herdman et al. 2003
) and thus support the validity of the present analysis. The use of source waveforms confers a significant advantage in signal processing, as averaging across independent sensors reduces intrinsic sensor noise resulting in waveforms with higher signal-to-noise ratios relative to the magnetic field waveforms (Ross et al. 2000
). Moreover, conducting subsequent processing, such as time–frequency analyses, on source- versus sensor-waveforms allows greater specificity in regard to neuronal processing in a circumscribed brain region, as measurements are less sensitive to electromagnetic sources in other neural areas.
MEG Spectral Analyses
In each participant, single-trial source waveform data per condition were transformed into the time–frequency domain using complex demodulation (Papp and Ktonas 1977
; Hoechstetter et al. 2004
). The resulting spectral density power estimations were then averaged over trials to generate time–frequency displays of complex spectral density (final resolution: 2.5 Hz at 20 ms). These data were then normalized by dividing the power value of each poststimulus time–frequency bin by the respective frequency's baseline power (see Fig. 1), calculated as the mean power from 140- to 20-ms prestimulus onset. Using such a temporal window helped to minimize the influence of filtering artifacts on baseline power calculations. The relative mean 40 Hz power from 200- to 500-ms poststimulus was then determined for contralateral and ipsilateral generators in each condition and participant. This poststimulus window was chosen to focus analyses on the SSR rather than transient evoked components based on prior published data (Ross et al. 2002
); however, the validity of this window for SSR calculations was also readily discernible from these data (Fig. 1). For exploratory purposes, we also applied these analytic procedures to calculate the relative mean power for both 20- and 30-Hz bands during this same time period. The Brain Electrical Source Analysis software (BESA 5.1.4; MEGIS Software GmbH, Germany) was used for all MEG preprocessing, source modeling, and time–frequency decompositions.
|
Statistical Analysis
SPSS for Windows (Release 11.0.1) was used for statistical analyses. Significance tests were 2 tailed and evaluated at 0.05 alpha. Type III sums of squares were used for analysis of variance (ANOVA) models. Group differences on demographic variables were examined through independent Student's t-tests, whereas source location and peak latency differences were assessed using 2 x 2 mixed-model ANOVAs (i.e., hemisphere-by-group). Our primary comparisons involving relative mean 40-Hz power estimations, for the 200- to 500-ms poststimulus window, were analyzed in a 2 x 2 x 2 mixed-model ANOVA design, with ear stimulated and hemisphere as within-subjects variables, and group as the between-subjects variable. This 3-way design was also utilized in exploratory analyses of the 20- and 30-Hz bands, and to probe for baseline power differences in each frequency bin.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Source Location and Latency
To examine group differences in functional organization, we conducted a mixed-model ANOVA for each coordinate dimension. These results indicated no significant main effects of hemisphere or group, and no group-by-hemisphere interaction effects for X- (medial–lateral), Y- (anterior–posterior), or Z-coordinate (superior–inferior) locations. In contrast, an overall group effect of peak latency F1,18 = 5.88 (P < 0.05) was detected, which showed that SSR reached maximum power significantly later in the patient group (see Fig. 2). This analysis did not indicate a significant effect of hemisphere or an interaction effect for measures of peak SSR latency.
|
Forty-Hertz Power Estimations
The main effect of ear stimulated was not significant, but both hemisphere and group effects were significant (see Fig. 3). The hemisphere effect indicated significantly greater 40 Hz power for right-hemispheric generators across groups F1,18 = 18.23 (P < 0.001), whereas the between-subjects effect showed significantly reduced overall 40 Hz power in patients relative to controls, F1,18 = 9.79 (P < 0.01). Neither of the 2-term interaction effects involving group were significant, but the ear stimulated-by-hemisphere interaction was significant F1,18 = 5.33 (P < 0.05), and follow-up tests indicated that right ear stimulation elicited more left-hemispheric 40 Hz power across groups, t(19) = 2.59 (P < 0.02). In right auditory cortices, ipsi- versus contralateral stimulation showed no overall effect on 40 Hz power. Lastly, the 3-way interaction effect approached significance but did not satisfy our minimum criteria for alpha, F1,18 = 3.40 (P < 0.10).
|
Given the evidence for aberrant long-range connectivity in schizophrenia and other psychoses (e.g., Andreasen et al. 1996
Twenty-Hertz, 30-Hz, and Baseline Power Estimations
To scrutinize the specificity and basis of these 40-Hz findings, we performed a series of exploratory 3-way ANOVA analyses (ear stimulated, hemisphere, and group) examining baseline power estimations, and relative mean 20 and 30 Hz power during the 200- to 500-ms poststimulus window. These exploratory analyses yielded only negative findings, as we did not detect any main or interaction effects for baseline power at 20 Hz (all Ps > 0.64), 30 Hz (all Ps > 0.46), or 40 Hz (all Ps > 0.24). Likewise, probing relative mean power during the 200- to 500-ms SSR period indicated null results at both 20 Hz (all Ps > 0.17) and 30 Hz (all Ps > 0.13).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We examined contra- and ipsilateral generators of the auditory 40-Hz SSR in a group of healthy adolescents, and a matched sample with psychosis. Across these groups, gamma-band SSR were significantly stronger in right relative to left auditory cortices and showed a right ear advantage for left-hemispheric source power, both of which are consistent with previous data from normal adult participants (Ross et al. 2005
Our finding of right greater than left gamma power is largely consistent with a recent MEG study investigating laterality of auditory neural responses in normal adults (Ross et al. 2005
). Using monaural and binaural stimulation paradigms, Ross et al. (2005)
demonstrated that all auditory components (i.e., transient gamma-band, P1m, N1m, 40-Hz SSR, and sustained responses) showed laterality toward the contralateral hemisphere during monaural stimulation. However, during binaural stimulation, only the sustained response and SSR showed significant laterality indexes, with both indicating right-hemispheric dominance (Ross et al. 2005
). Our main effect of greater right-hemispheric gamma-band power is analogous to these findings, and also corroborates other studies detecting the same effect while investigating other aspects of the SSR (e.g., Schneider et al. 2002
; Hertrich et al. 2004
). Although the functional significance of auditory SSR is not fully understood, this right-hemispheric dominance is thought to reflect the broad hemispheric specialization dichotomy of rapid temporal processing (e.g., speech) in left and envelope processing (e.g., music) in right auditory cortices (Tervaniemi and Hugdahl 2003
). By comparison, our across group finding of a right ear advantage for left-hemispheric source power is far less consistent with previous reports. Ross et al. (2005)
showed a significant left ear advantage for right-hemispheric power, but only a trend toward a right ear advantage in left auditory cortices (i.e., the reverse pattern of our data). However, we believe that this difference is largely attributable to the fact that normally developing adolescents exhibit increased within-group variance, as well as to the inclusion of patient data in all analyses due to our primary focus being between-group effects. In actuality, the asymmetry pattern reported by Ross et al. (2005)
is remarkably similar to control data shown in Figure 3.
The overall reduction in 40 Hz power exhibited by adolescents with psychosis is our most important finding, as it indicates gamma abnormalities emerge early in the disease process and conveys crucial information concerning the underlying nature of connectivity disruptions in psychosis. Previous hemodynamic studies of psychotic adults have shown reduced functional connectivity amongst constituent elements of task-specific neural networks (Friston et al. 1996
; Lawrie et al. 2002
; Boksman et al. 2005
; Honey et al. 2005
), but DTI studies in the same population have not yet provided consistent evidence for structural tract aberrations as a potential substrate (Kanaan et al. 2005
; Kubicki et al. 2007
). Thus, the gamma-band abnormalities detected in these adolescents, and those previously reported in adult patients (Lee et al. 2003a
, 2003b
; Spencer et al. 2003
; O'Donnell et al. 2004
; Symond et al. 2005
), may reflect the same basic mechanisms detected in hemodynamic studies of dysfunctional connectivity in psychosis. Essentially, given the largely negative findings from DTI, interregional connectivity may be preserved in schizophrenia but not efficiently utilized because of a reduced capacity to generate and/or maintain high-frequency oscillatory activity, which although speculative could be mediated by an inherent lack of local inhibitory functioning (Pierri et al. 1999
). Multiple investigators have further described significant correlations between distinct gamma-based indexes (e.g., synchronicity, phase-locking) and other symptom dimensions in patients with chronic schizophrenia (Lee et al. 2003b
; Spencer et al. 2004
), thus making the important connection with behavioral symptomatology. Lastly, it is worth noting that our 40-Hz click-train maximally entrained intrinsic gamma-frequency oscillators significantly earlier in normally developing adolescents, which supports a previous report using the same stimulus in schizophrenic adults (Kwon et al. 1999
) and corroborates the notion of an inherent deficiency in generating gamma-band activity in psychosis.
Although local circuit integrity was the primary focus of this study, we also utilized the distinctive architecture of early neural pathways serving the auditory system (i.e., the incomplete decussation) to investigate more long-range connectivity patterns beyond the neocortex. By computing a contra- versus ipsilateral stimulation metric for each SSR generator, we found a significantly reduced overall ear-of-stimulation effect in adolescents with psychosis. This finding suggests that abnormal connectivity is not confined to cortical regions in psychosis, but may actually involve some of the central nervous system's earliest pathways. However, given the nature of these data, it is unclear whether this reduction in asymmetry is primarily attributable to long-range connectivity aberrations, or simply irregular patterns of auditory tract decussation. To our knowledge, functional connectivity along these pathways has not been directly examined in previous studies of schizophrenia or other psychoses (irrespective of age), which is surprising given the straightforward implications such abnormality would hold for observable symptomatology (e.g., deficient sound localization). Thus, although intriguing, this finding needs to be further scrutinized by future investigators, as well as extended to other auditory stimuli and potentially to other sensory modalities where unilateral stimulation is known to evoke bilateral activation (e.g., somatosensory system). Due to the temporal dynamics of the SSR, including its late peak (i.e., after 200 ms) and prolonged duration (i.e., 200–500 ms), potential callosal contributions in generating and/or sustaining ipsilateral gamma activity will need to be carefully probed in future work, especially given the corpus callosum anomalies known to be associated with psychosis (Woodruff et al. 1995
; Buchsbaum et al. 2006
).
In conclusion, our primary findings indicate a specific abnormality in the production and/or maintenance of bilateral auditory 40-Hz activity in adolescents with early-onset psychosis. We believe that reduced quantities of GABA-ergic interneurons or functional synapses may be the neural mechanism underlying this impairment due to the known role of such cells in generating high-frequency activity. Overall, these findings augment current dysfunctional connectivity theories of psychosis (Andreasen et al. 1996
, 1998
; Friston 1998
) by supplying evidence of local circuitry aberrations early in the disease process, as well as inaugural data suggesting functionally abnormal neural tracts connecting higher systems with the initial sensory interface. A currently widespread belief in neurophysiology holds that gamma oscillations are crucial to coordinating information processing; thus, impairment in generating high-frequency activity could be expressed as a failure to integrate information elements processed by disparate brain regions. Such a mechanism would be consistent with the corpus of hemodynamic data supporting aberrant cortical coordination in psychosis, as these methods are unable to distinguish the locus of functional connectivity impairments (i.e., aberrant neuronal tracts and/or local circuitry deficits). In light of post-mortem work (Pierri et al. 1999
), we believe that this is an important consideration as a local circuit dysfunction could impair long-range communication over intact neuronal tracts, and ultimately yield the overall pattern of dysfunctional connectivity and disintegration symptomatology commonly found in psychosis patients.
To close, it is important to recognize limitations of this work including the small sample size, inherent difficulty of diagnostic specificity in cases of early-onset psychosis, and the relatively unknown effects of medication on neuronal indices, all of which limit the generalizability of these findings. One of the principle limitations of the study is that although sufficiently powered to detect differences between adolescents with and without a history of psychosis, the sample was too small to adequately address whether differences in gamma-band power might exist between subjects with mood-related psychoses and schizophreniform psychoses. Prior studies that used identical stimuli have reported power reductions in the adult form of each disorder relative to well-matched control groups (e.g., Kwon et al. 1999
; O'Donnell et al. 2004
). Thus, we believe the similarity of findings across these studies indicates that such differences, if they exist, will be small, necessitating rather large samples in any follow-up investigation attempting direct comparisons. As such, we do not assert in this study that there is any evidence for a difference or lack thereof in gamma-band power between various psychotic subgroups. In regard to medication, it is worth noting that Hong et al. (2004)
reported reduced gamma-band power in nonmedicated first-degree relatives of schizophrenia patients compared with healthy controls, and a significant inverse correlation between 40 Hz power and dosage of typical, but not atypical, antipsychotic medications in adult patients (Hong et al. 2004
). Moreover, their atypically medicated patients with schizophrenia actually showed significantly greater 40 Hz power relative to the control group (Hong et al. 2004
), which clearly argues against attributing our findings to medication effects as all patients on antipsychotic drugs (i.e., 8/10) were taking the atypical type at the time of study. A final caveat to this and related work is that functional connectivity aberrations cannot be considered specific to psychosis as they have been reported in other conditions that share significant symptomatology (e.g., autistic disorder; Just et al. 2004
). This overall pattern could indicate that such anomalies in neural connectivity, whether quantified through DTI, fMRI, MEG, or another methodology, are better understood as neurobiological markers of nonspecific risk factors or features of the symptomatology which, like the behavioral symptoms themselves, are shared across some neurodevelopmental disorders.
| Supplementary Materials |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Supplementary Fig. 1 can be found at http://www.cercor.oxfordjournals.org/.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work was supported by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH63442-02), and the Developmental Psychobiology Research Group of the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center (UCHSC), Denver, CO, USA. Support for T.W.W. was provided by USPHS grant T32 MH15442, "Development of Maladaptive Behavior" (UCHSC Institutional Postdoctoral Research Training Program), and grant F32 MH78359, "Sensorimotor Interactions in Childhood Schizophrenia." Conflict of Interest: None declared.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Altshuler LL, Ventura J, van Gorp WG, Green MF, Theberge DC, Mintz J. Neurocognitive function in clinically stable men with bipolar I disorder or schizophrenia and normal control subjects. Biol Psychiatry (2004) 56:560–569.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Andreasen NC. Linking mind and brain in the study of mental illness: a project for a scientific psychopathology. Science (1997) 275:1586–1593.
Andreasen NC. A unitary model of schizophrenia: Bleuler's "fragmented phrene" as schizencephaly. Arch Gen Psychiatry (1998) 56:781–787.[Web of Science]
Andreasen NC, Nopoulos P, O'Leary DS, Miller DD, Wassink T, Flaum M. Defining the phenotype of schizophrenia: cognitive dysmetria and its neural mechanisms. Biol Psychiatry (1999) 46:908–920.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Andreasen NC, O'Leary DS, Cizadlo T, Arndt S, Rezai K, Boles-Ponto LL, Watkins GL, Hichwa RD. Schizophrenia and cognitive dysmetria: a positron-emission tomography study of dysfunctional prefrontal-thalamic-cerebellar circuitry. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1996) 93:9985–9990.
Andreasen NC, Paradiso S, O'Leary DS. "Cognitive dysmetria" as an integrative theory of schizophrenia: a dysfunction in cortical-subcortical-cerebellar circuitry? Schizophr Bull (1998) 24:203–218.
Annett M. Left, right, hand and brain: the right shift theory (1985) NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale.
Bartos M, Vida I, Frotscher M, Meyer A, Monyer H, Geiger JRP, Jonas P. Fast synaptic inhibition promotes synchronized gamma oscillations in hippocampal interneuron networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2002) 99:13222–13227.
Boettcher FA, Madhotra D, Poth EA, Mills JH. The frequency-modulation following response in young and aged human subjects. Hear Res (2002) 165:10–18.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Boettcher FA, Poth EA, Mills JH, Dubno JR. The amplitude-modulation following response in young and aged human subjects. Hear Res (2001) 153:32–42.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Boksman K, Theberge J, Williamson P, Drost DJ, Malla A, Densmore M, Takhar J, Pavlosky W, Menon R, Neufeld R. A 4.0-T fMRI study of brain connectivity during word fluency in first-episode schizophrenia. Schizophr Res (2005) 75:247–263.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Bombin I, Arango C, Buchanan RW. Significance and meaning of neurological signs in schizophrenia: two decades later [review]. Schizophr Bull (2005) 31:962–977.
Bragin A, Jando G, Nadasdy Z, Hetke J, Wise K, Buzsaki G. Gamma (40–100 Hz) oscillation in the hippocampus of the behaving rat. J Neurosci (1995) 15:47–60.[Abstract]
Buchsbaum MS, Friedman J, Buchsbaum BR, Chu KW, Hazlett EA, Newmark R, Schneiderman J, Torosjan Y, Tang C, Hof P. Diffusion tensor imaging in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry (2006) 60:1181–1187.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Engel AK, Roelfsema PR, Fries P, Brecht M, Singer W. Role of the temporal domain for response selection and perceptual binding. Cereb Cortex (1997) 7:571–582.
Engelien A, Schulz M, Ross B, Arolt V, Pantev C. A combined functional in vivo measure for primary and secondary auditory cortices. Hear Res (2000) 148:153–160.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Friston KJ. The disconnection hypothesis. Schizophr Res (1998) 30:115–125.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Friston KJ, Frith CD. Schizophrenia: a disconnection syndrome. Clin Neurosci (1995) 3:89–97.[Web of Science][Medline]
Friston KJ, Herold S, Fletcher P, Silbersweig D, Cahill C, Dolan RJ, Liddle PF, Frackowiak RS, Frith CD. Abnormal fronto-temporal interactions in schizophrenia. In: Biology of schizophrenia and affective disease—Watson SJ, ed. (1996) 1st ed. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Press. 421–429.
Gray JA. Integrating schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull (1998) 24:249–266.
Grothe B, Klump BM. Temporal processing in sensory systems. Curr Opin Neurobiol (2000) 10:467–473.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Hari R, Hamalainen M, Joutsiniemi SL. Neuromagnetic steady-state responses to auditory stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am (1989) 86:1033–1039.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Hemsley DR. Schizophrenia: a cognitive model and its implications for psychological intervention. Behav Modif (1996) 20:139–169.
Herdman AT, Wollbrink A, Chau W, Ishii R, Ross B, Pantev C. Determination of activation areas in the human auditory cortex by means of synthetic aperture magnetometry. NeuroImage (2003) 20:995–1005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Hertrich I, Mathiak K, Lutzenberger W, Ackermann H. Transient and phase-locked evoked magnetic fields in response to periodic acoustic signals. NeuroReport (2004) 15:1687–1690.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Hoechstetter K, Bornfleth H, Weckesser D, Ille N, Berg P, Scherg M. BESA source coherence: a new method to study cortical oscillatory coupling. Brain Topogr (2004) 16:233–238.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Hollingshead AB. Four factor index of social status (1975) CT: Yale University: New Haven.
Hong LE, Summerfelt A, McMahon R, Adami H, Francis G, Elliott A, Buchanan R, Thaker G. Evoked gamma band synchronization and the liability for schizophrenia. Schizophr Res (2004) 70:293–302.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Honey GD, Pomarol-Clotet E, Corlett PR, Honey RAE, McKenna PJ, Bullmore ET, Fletcher PC. Functional dysconnectivity in schizophrenia associated with attentional modulation of motor function. Brain (2005) 128:2597–2611.
Isohanni M, Jones PB, Moilanen K, Rantakallio P, Veijola J, Oja H, Koiranen M, Jokelainen J, Croudace T, Jarvelin MR. Early developmental milestones in adult schizophrenia and other psychoses. A 31-year follow-up of the northern Finland 1966 birth cohort. Schizophr Res (2001) 52:1–19.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Just MA, Cherkassky VL, Keller TA, Minshew NJ. Cortical activation and synchronization during sentence comprehension in high-functioning autism: evidence of under-connectivity. Brain (2004) 127:1811–1821.
Kanaan RAA, Kim JS, Kaufmann WE, Pearlson GD, Barker GJ, McGuire PK. Diffusion tensor imaging in schizophrenia [review]. Biol Psychiatry (2005) 58:921–929.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kaufman J, Birmaher B, Brent D, Rao U, Flynn C, Moreci P, Williamson D, Ryan N. Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children—present and lifetime version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry (1997) 36:980–988.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kubicki M, McCarley R, Westin CF, Park HJ, Maier S, Kikinis R, Jolesz FA, Shenton ME. A review of diffusion tensor imaging studies in schizophrenia [review]. J Psychiatr Res (2007) 41:15–30.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Kwon JS, O'Donnell BF, Wallenstein GV, Greene RW, Hirayasu Y, Nestor PG, et al. Gamma frequency-range abnormalities to auditory stimulation in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry (1999) 56:1001–1005.
Lawrie SM, Buechel C, Whalley HC, Frith CD, Friston KJ, Johnstone EC. Reduced frontotemporal functional connectivity in schizophrenia associated with auditory hallucinations. Biol Psychiatry (2002) 12:1008–1011.
Lee KH, Williams LM, Breakspear M, Gordon E. Synchronous gamma activity: a review and contribution to an integrative neuroscience model of schizophrenia [review]. Brain Res Brain Res Rev (2003a) 41:57–78.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lee KH, Williams LM, Haig A, Gordon E. Gamma (40 Hz) phase synchronicity and symptom dimensions in schizophrenia. Cognit Neuropsychiatry (2003b) 8:57–71.[Medline]
Liang M, Zhou Y, Jiang T, Liu Z, Tian L, Liu H, Hao YB. Widespread functional disconnectivity in schizophrenia with resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. NeuroReport (2006) 17:209–213.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
O'Donnell BF, Hetrick WP, Vohs JL, Krishnan GP, Carroll CA, Shekhar A. Neural synchronization deficits to auditory stimulation in bipolar disorder. NeuroReport (2004) 15:1369–1372.[Web of Science][Medline]
Pantev C, Roberts LE, Elbert T, Ross B, Wienbruch C. Tonotopic organization of the sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Hear Res (1996) 102:62–74.
Papp N, Ktonas P. Critical evaluation of complex demodulation techniques for the quantification of bioelectrical activity. Biomed Sci Instrum (1977) 13:135–143.[Medline]
Pierri JN, Chaudry AS, Woo TUW, Lewis DA. Alterations in chandelier neuron axon terminals in the prefrontal cortex of schizophrenic subjects. Am J Psychiatry (1999) 156:1709–1719.
Porjesz B, Almasy L, Edenberg HJ, Wang K, Chorlian DB, Foroud T, Goate A, Rice JP, O'Connor SJ, Rohrbaugh J, et al. Linkage disequilibrium between the beta frequency of the human EEG and a GABA-A receptor gene locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2002) 99:3729–3733.
Rojas DC, Camou SL, Reite ML, Rogers SJ. Planum temporale volume in children and adolescents with autism. J Autism Dev Disord (2005) 35:479–486.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ross B, Borgmann C, Draganova R, Roberts LE, Pantev C. A high-precision magnetoencephalographic study of human auditory steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones. J Acoust Soc Am (2000) 108:679–691.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ross B, Herdman AT, Pantev C. Right hemispheric laterality of human 40 Hz auditory steady-state responses. Cereb Cortex (2005) 15:2029–2039.
Ross B, Picton TW, Pantev C. Temporal integration in the human auditory cortex as represented by the development of the steady-state magnetic field. Hear Res (2002) 165:68–84.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Schneider P, Scherg M, Dosch HG, Specht HJ, Gutschalk A, Rupp A. Morphology of Heschl's gyrus reflects enhanced activation in the auditory cortex of musicians. Nat Neurosci (2002) 5:688–694.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Sigurdsson E, Fombonne E, Sayal K, Checkley S. Neurodevelopmental antecedents of early-onset bipolar affective disorder. Br J Psychiatry (1999) 174:121–127.
Silverstein SM, Knight RA, Schwarzkopf SB, West LL, Osborn LM, Kamin D. Stimulus configuration and context effects in perceptual organization in schizophrenia. J Abnorm Psychol (1996) 105:410–420.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Singer W, Gray CM. Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. Annu Rev Neurosci (1995) 18:555–586.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Spencer KM, Nestor PG, Niznikiewicz MA, Salisbury DF, Shenton ME, McCarley RW. Abnormal neural synchrony in schizophrenia. J Neurosci (2003) 23:7407–7411.
Spencer KM, Nestor PG, Perlmutter R, Niznikiewicz MA, Klump MC, Frumin M, Shenton ME, McCarley RW. Neural synchrony indexes disordered perception and cognition in schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2004) 101:17288–17293.
Stapells DR, Linden D, Suffield JB, Hamel G, Picton TW. Human auditory steady state potentials. Ear Hear (1984) 5:105–113.[Web of Science][Medline]
Symond MB, Harris AWF, Gordon E, Williams LM. "Gamma synchrony" in first-episode schizophrenia: a disorder of temporal connectivity? Am J Psychiatry (2005) 162:459–465.
Teale PD, Carlson J, Rojas DC, Reite ML. Reduced laterality of the source locations for generators of the auditory steady-state field in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry (2003) 54:1149–1153.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Tervaniemi M, Hugdahl K. Lateralization of auditory-cortex functions [review]. Brain Res Brain Res Rev (2003) 43:231–246.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tesche CD, Uusitalo MA, Ilmoniemi RJ, Huotilainen M, Kajola M, Salonen O. Signal-space projections of MEG data characterize both distributed and well-localized neuronal sources. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol (1995) 95:189–200.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
The Psychological Corporation. The Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence (1999) San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace.
Traub RD, Whittington MA, Stanford IM, Jefferys JA. Mechanism for generation of long-range synchronous fast oscillations in the cortex. Nature (1996) 383:621–624.[CrossRef][Medline]
Whittington MA, Traub RD, Jefferys JG. Synchronized oscillations in interneuron networks driven by metabotropic glutamate receptor activation. Nature (1995) 373:612–615.[CrossRef][Medline]
Woodruff PW, McManus IC, David AS. Meta-analysis of corpus callosum size in schizophrenia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry (1995) 58:457–461.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Nerelius, A. Sandegren, H. Sargsyan, R. Raunak, H. Leijonmarck, U. Chatterjee, A. Fisahn, S. Imarisio, D. A. Lomas, D. C. Crowther, et al. {alpha}-Helix targeting reduces amyloid-{beta} peptide toxicity PNAS, June 9, 2009; 106(23): 9191 - 9196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

200 ms and begins to dissipate 

