Skip Navigation


Cerebral Cortex Advance Access originally published online on October 26, 2005
Cerebral Cortex 2006 16(9):1239-1248; doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj065
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/9/1239    most recent
bhj065v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamada, K.
Right arrow Articles by Komatsu, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamada, K.
Right arrow Articles by Komatsu, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

High-Frequency Stimulation Together with Adrenoceptor Activation Facilitates the Maintenance of Long-Term Potentiation at Visual Cortical Inhibitory Synapses

Kazumasa Yamada, Tsuyoshi Inagaki, Rie Funahashi, Yumiko Yoshimura and Yukio Komatsu

Department of Visual Neuroscience, Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan

Address correspondence to Dr Yukio Komatsu, Department of Visual Neuroscience, Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan. Email: komatsu{at}riem.nagoya-u.ac.jp.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Long-term potentiation (LTP) at inhibitory synapses of rat visual cortex requires firing of presynaptic cells for maintenance, at least at a low frequency. We examined the roles of adrenoceptors in this LTP maintenance. Although high-frequency stimulation (HFS) failed to produce LTP in normal Ca2+ medium, it produced pathway-specific LTP with addition of noradrenaline to the medium soon after HFS. However, this LTP disappeared after washout of noradrenaline. HFS applied during noradrenaline application produced LTP persisting even after washout, indicating that HFS together with adrenoceptor activation makes the adrenergic facilitation enduring. After washout, LTP was produced further by HFS of the conditioned, but not the unconditioned, pathway by the first HFS. Pharmacological examination demonstrated that {alpha}2 and ß, but not {alpha}1, receptors facilitated LTP maintenance synergistically. Bath application, but not postsynaptic loading, of either the adenylyl cyclase activator forskolin or the protein kinase C (PKC) activator phorbol ester facilitated LTP maintenance. These results suggest that adrenergic facilitation of LTP maintenance is mediated by presynaptic adrenoceptors via a subfamily of adenylyl cyclases stimulated by Gs{alpha}, Giß{gamma}, and PKC. Thus, it is likely that the activity of noradrenergic afferents takes part in the control of LTP duration at visual cortical inhibitory synapses.

Key Words: adrenergic • inhibitory synapses • LTP • maintenance • visual cortex


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Visual response properties are refined in an experience-dependent manner during postnatal development in visual cortex (Wiesel 1982Go; Frégnac and Imbert 1984Go). Noradrenergic afferents are likely to play a permissive role in this process (Kasamatsu and Pettigrew 1976Go; Bear and Singer 1986Go). Noradrenergic cells in locus ceruleus show spontaneous firing far more frequently during arousal than sleep (Aston-Jones and others 1990Go). During arousal, sensory stimulation produces firing in these cells (Aston-Jones and others 1990Go), and visual stimulation increases the release of noradrenaline in visual cortex (Marrocco and others 1987Go). These observations suggest that noradrenaline allows visual response properties to undergo long-lasting modification effectively when animals are looking at their visual environment attentively. The effect of noradrenaline on visual response plasticity can be mediated at least in part by modulation of long-term synaptic modification. Some papers have documented observations suggesting that adrenoceptors are involved in long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) at excitatory synapses of visual cortex (Brocher and others 1992Go; Kato 1993Go; Kirkwood and others 1999Go).

We found that LTP also occurs at inhibitory synapses in developing rat visual cortex (Komatsu and Iwakiri 1993Go) and that noradrenaline is involved in its production too (Komatsu 1996Go; Komatsu and Yoshimura 2000Go). This inhibitory LTP requires the transient elevation of Ca2+ in postsynaptic cells in response to high-frequency stimulation (HFS) for induction, like most LTP at excitatory synapses (Komatsu 1996Go). This elevation likely resulted from phospholipase C (PLC) activation, inositol trisphosphate (IP3) formation, and Ca2+ release from internal Ca2+ stores via IP3 receptor activation. Noradrenaline is involved in this process through the activation of {alpha}1 adrenoceptors coupled with PLC.

The maintenance of this inhibitory LTP also requires neural activity, spike firing of presynaptic inhibitory cells at some frequency, which is lower than the frequency of test stimulation (0.1 Hz) usually used in LTP studies (Komatsu and Yoshimura 2000Go). This property has not been documented for long-term synaptic modifications other than this inhibitory LTP and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor–independent LTP at visual cortical excitatory synapses (Liu and others 2004Go). According to our previous study on activity-dependent maintenance of inhibitory LTP in layer-5 cells (Komatsu and Yoshimura 2000Go), the maintenance is mediated by presynaptic Ca2+ entry associated with action potentials through multiple types of Ca2+ channels, which activates Ca2+-dependent reactions different from those triggering transmitter release. The Ca2+ entry is likely regulated by K+ channels, presumably large-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ (BK) channels.

LTP occurred frequently at high extracellular Ca2+ concentrations ([Ca2+]o), but rarely at normal [Ca2+]o (Komatsu and Yoshimura 2000Go). When HFS was applied during a temporary reduction in [Ca2+]o from high to normal levels, LTP occurred if high [Ca2+]o was resumed immediately after HFS (upper diagram of Fig. 1A). On the other hand, LTP, produced at high [Ca2+]o, was abolished by a temporary reduction in [Ca2+]o to the normal level and did not recover even after high [Ca2+]o was resumed (lower diagram of Fig. 1A). Therefore, it is considered that the dependence of LTP on [Ca2+]o is ascribed to the property of maintenance but not induction. The amount of Ca2+ entry may be insufficient for LTP maintenance at normal [Ca2+]o. When noradrenaline was added to the perfusion medium during the whole recording period, LTP persisted at normal [Ca2+]o, suggesting that LTP maintenance is facilitated by adrenoceptor activation (Komatsu and Yoshimura 2000Go). Thus, the activity of noradrenergic afferents may regulate the duration of LTP and thereby persistence of visual responsiveness modified by visual experience.


Figure 1
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Noradrenaline application started soon after HFS enables the maintenance of LTP at normal [Ca2+]o. (A) Schematic illustration of our previous finding indicating that LTP is induced, but not maintained, at normal [Ca2+]o (2.4 mM). The time course of changes in IPSP slope is shown schematically. The upper diagram shows that HFS applied during a temporary reduction in [Ca2+]o from high (4 mM) to normal values produces LTP when high [Ca2+]o is resumed immediately after HFS. The lower diagram illustrates that LTP produced at high [Ca2+]o is abolished by a temporary reduction in [Ca2+]o to the normal value. [Ca2+]o is 2.4 mM for the period indicated by gray, but it is 4 mM for the rest of the period. (B) Experimental arrangement of stimulating (S1 and S2) and recording electrodes (r), with the left-side figures and a dashed line indicating cortical layers and surgical cuts, respectively. (C) HFS failed to produce LTP at normal [Ca2+]o. Traces show superimposed average (n = 6) responses before (a) and after HFS (b) for test (left) and control pathways (right) in a cell. The recorded time of the traces is indicated in the lower graph, in which the initial falling slope of IPSPs (mean ± SEM, percentage of the mean baseline) for test (squares) and control pathways (triangles) was plotted against the time after HFS for 10 cells. (D) Application of noradrenaline (5 µM) immediately after HFS enabled LTP maintenance at normal [Ca2+]o, although LTP disappeared after washout of noradrenaline. Upper and lower traces show superimposed average responses before HFS (a) and after HFS during noradrenaline application (b), and before HFS (a) and after noradrenaline washout (c) for test (left) and control pathways (right) in a cell, respectively. The horizontal bar (NA) indicates the period of noradrenaline application. The number of cells was seven.

 
The present study aims to characterize the adrenergic regulation of LTP maintenance at visual cortical inhibitory synapses and determine which subtypes of adrenoceptors are involved in this process and, furthermore, whether these receptors are located at pre- or postsynaptic sites. At normal [Ca2+]o, HFS produced potentiation of inhibitory synaptic transmission lasting during noradrenaline application started immediately after HFS, but it disappeared after noradrenaline washout. This facilitatory effect of noradrenaline became long lasting when HFS was applied during noradrenaline application. Pharmacological analysis suggests that noradrenergic facilitation of LTP maintenance is mediated by the activation of presynaptic {alpha}2 and ß adrenoceptors in a synergistic way via cyclic AMP (cAMP) formation.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Sprague-Dawley rats at postnatal 20–29 days were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane before the whole brain was removed from the skull and immersed in an ice-cold oxygenated (95% O2 and 5% CO2) artificial cerebrospinal solution (ACSF) containing (in millimolar concentrations) 124 NaCl, 5 KCl, 1.3 MgSO4, 2.4 CaCl2, 1.2 KH2PO4, 26 NaHCO3, and 10 glucose. Then, coronal slices of primary visual cortex (400-µm thick) were prepared using a Microslicer (DTK-1000, Dosaka, Kyoto, Japan) and kept in a recovery chamber perfused with ACSF at 33 °C. During the recording experiments, the medium, maintained at 33 °C, contained 100 µM DL-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (APV), an NMDA receptor antagonist, and 40 µM 6,7-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (DNQX), a non–NMDA receptor antagonist. In some experiments, we used ACSF containing a high concentration (4 mM) of CaCl2.

Two pairs of bipolar stimulating electrodes (S1 and S2 in Fig. 1B) made of tungsten wires (diameter, 100 µm; interpolar distance; 200 µm) were placed in layer 4, separated from each other by about 0.5 mm. Layer 2–4 was surgically cut between S1 and S2 to ensure that separate groups of presynaptic fibers were activated. Test stimulation was applied alternately to S1 and S2 at intervals of 5 s. As a conditioning stimulation, HFS (50 Hz, 1 s) was applied to one of the electrodes 10 times at intervals of 10 s. The intensity of the test stimulation and HFS was adjusted to 1.5–2 and 5 times the threshold intensity, respectively, to evoke inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs).

Intracellular recording was conducted with sharp glass pipettes containing 2 M K-methylsulfate (40–50 M{Omega}). In some of the experiments, the internal solution of the electrode contained 2% biocytin. For analysis, we selected cells with a stable resting membrane potential hyperpolarized more than –50 mV. When the resting membrane potential was deeper than –60 mV, and consequently IPSPs evoked by test stimulation were too small, the membrane potential was depolarized by current injection through the recording electrode in order to increase the amplitude of IPSPs. Input resistance was monitored throughout the experiments by injecting 0.05–0.1 nA hyperpolarizing current pulses. A bridge circuit was used to record the membrane potential while the current injection was administered through the recording electrode (Axoclamp 2A, Axon Instruments, Foster City, California). In the present study, drug application did not produce any significant changes (P > 0.05) in either the resting membrane potential or the input resistance, unless otherwise mentioned.

In experiments employing forskolin or phorbol 12,13-didecanoate (PDD), we used the blind-patch whole-cell recording method to record IPSPs. Patch pipettes (5–6 M{Omega}) were filled with a solution containing (in millimolar concentrations) 125 K-gluconate, 2 NaCl, 2 KCl, 3 MgCl2, 1 ethyleneglycol-bis(aminoethylether)-tetraacetic acid, 20 N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N'-2-ethanesulfonic acid, 3 MgATP, 0.5 Na2GTP, and 0.2% biocytin (pH 7.3 with KOH). For analysis, we selected cells, identified later as layer-5 pyramidal cells by histological examination, that had a high seal resistance (>1 G{Omega}) and a series resistance <35 M{Omega}. The laminar location of the stimulating and recording electrodes was identified on histological sections stained with cresyl violet after the recordings, as described previously (Komatsu 1994Go). The procedure for biocytin staining was employed as described previously (Yoshimura and others 2003Go).

Data were expressed as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM), and either Student's t-test or Welch's test was applied. The compounds used were obtained from the following sources: APV and DNQX from Tocris (Bristol, United Kingdom); noradrenaline, methoxamine, clonidine, UK-14304, isoproterenol, rauwolscine, timolol, forskolin, PDD, and biocytin from Sigma (St. Louis, Missouri); and isoflurane from Abbott laboratories (North Chicago, Illinois).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Intracellular recording studies were conducted in visual cortical slices of developing rats at postnatal 20–29 days, when LTP of IPSPs occurs frequently (Komatsu 1994Go). IPSPs evoked by layer-4 stimulation were recorded from layer-5 neurons under a pharmacological blockade of excitatory synaptic transmission. In most of the experiments, sharp electrodes were used to record IPSPs because stable recording was possible for longer periods compared with patch electrodes. However, in experiments in which compounds were loaded into recorded cells, we used patch electrodes instead. One of two stimulating electrodes placed in layer 4 was used to test the effect of HFS and the other served as a control (Fig. 1B). The control perfusion solution contained 2.4 mM of Ca2+, which is within the range of [Ca2+]o normally used. We employed strong HFS, which almost always produced LTP at high (4 mM) [Ca2+]o (Komatsu 1994Go). Some (n = 33) of the sampled cells in this study were recorded with sharp electrodes containing biocytin, and they were all identified as layer-5 pyramidal cells by a histological examination conducted later. Thus, it is likely that the sharp electrodes we used allowed us to stably record responses only from pyramidal cells for a time period long enough to analyze LTP, suggesting that the other morphologically unidentified cells were mostly pyramidal cells.

Noradrenaline Facilitates LTP Maintenance

Our previous study showed that LTP did not occur at normal [Ca2+]o, and we concluded that HFS could induce but not maintain potentiation at normal [Ca2+]o based on analyses with changing [Ca2+]o (Komatsu and Yoshimura 2000Go), which is illustrated schematically in Fig. 1A. However, LTP occurred at normal [Ca2+]o when the solution contained noradrenaline (5 µM) during the whole recording period (Komatsu and Yoshimura 2000Go). We first tested the possibility that noradrenaline facilitates the maintenance of LTP. LTP did not occur at normal [Ca2+]o (Fig. 1C), consistent with our previous study. When we started noradrenaline application immediately after HFS, potentiation occurred in the pathway conditioned by HFS, with no changes in unconditioned pathway responses (Fig. 1D). This potentiation lasted without any obvious decline during noradrenaline application continued for 30 min. However, it gradually disappeared after starting washout of noradrenaline. Therefore, we consider that LTP persists at normal [Ca2+]o, while noradrenaline application started soon after HFS is continued.

Coapplication of Noradrenaline and HFS Produces Long-Lasting Facilitation of LTP Maintenance

Although LTP persisted only during noradrenaline application in the experiment mentioned above, it persisted even after washout of noradrenaline when HFS was applied during noradrenaline application (Fig. 2). Thus, it is likely that the facilitatory effect of noradrenaline on LTP maintenance becomes enduring when HFS is applied during noradrenaline application. To test whether this long-lasting facilitation is specific to the synapses activated by HFS, we applied HFS again to either the conditioned or the unconditioned pathway after washout of noradrenaline. Figure 3A illustrates an example of those experiments testing this. Noradrenaline was washed out soon after HFS, which produced LTP. Forty minutes after HFS, the second HFS, applied to the pathway unconditioned by the first HFS, failed to produce LTP, indicating that noradrenaline was already washed out substantially. The third HFS, applied about 70 min after the first HFS to the pathway conditioned by the first HFS, produced further LTP.


Figure 2
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Coapplication of HFS and noradrenaline enables the maintenance of LTP after washout of noradrenaline. HFS was applied during noradrenaline application, and noradrenaline was washed out soon after HFS. Traces show superimposed average responses before (a) and after HFS (b) for test (left) and control pathways (right) in a cell. The recorded time of the traces is indicated in the lower graph, in which the initial falling slope of IPSPs for test (squares) and control pathways (triangles) was plotted against the time after HFS (n = 11). The horizontal bar (NA) shows the noradrenaline application period.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Coapplication of HFS and noradrenaline enables the following HFS applied after noradrenaline washout to produce LTP. (A) An example case showing long-lasting facilitation of LTP maintenance. Noradrenaline was washed out after HFS was applied to S1. The following HFS, applied to S1 but not S2, produced LTP. The application time for HFS is indicated by arrows in the right figure, in which the initial falling slope of IPSPs for S1 (squares) and S2 pathways (triangles) was plotted against the time after the first HFS to S1. The horizontal bar (NA) shows the noradrenaline application period. (B, C) Summary of experiments illustrated in (A). In the left half of figures, IPSP slopes for S1 (squares) and S2 pathways (triangles) were plotted against the time after the first HFS to S1. Out of eight tested cells, HFS was applied to S1 in all of the cells (B) and to S2 in five cells (C) between 40 and 80 min after the first HFS to S1. In the right half of figures, IPSP slopes were plotted against the time after HFS applied to S1 (B) or S2 (C) subsequently to the first HFS. (D) Similar to (B), but the first and the second HFS were both applied to the same pathway (S1) without noradrenaline application (n = 8). The interval between the first and the second HFS was 40–80 min. The superimposed traces on the left show example IPSPs before and after the first HFS (top) and those before and after the second HFS (bottom).

 
Figure 3B,C summarizes these experiments conducted in eight cells. Forty to eighty minutes after the first HFS, HFS was applied to the initially conditioned pathway again in all the cells and, in addition, to the unconditioned pathway in five of the cells. The first HFS, applied during noradrenaline application, produced LTP in these cells (Fig. 3B). After washout of noradrenaline, LTP was always produced by HFS applied to the initially conditioned pathway (Fig. 3B), whereas it was never produced by HFS applied to the initially unconditioned pathway (Fig. 3C). With no noradrenaline application, both the first and the second HFS applied to the same pathway failed to produce LTP (Fig. 3D). Thus, we conclude that long-lasting facilitation of LTP maintenance occurs specifically at synapses activated by HFS during noradrenaline application.

{alpha}2 and ß Adrenoceptors Are Involved in the Facilitation of LTP Maintenance

To determine the receptors mediating the facilitatory effect of noradrenaline on LTP maintenance, HFS was applied in the presence of subtype selective adrenergic agonists, and those compounds were washed out soon after HFS (Fig. 4). The {alpha}1-receptor agonist methoxamine, which may facilitate the induction of LTP (Komatsu 1996Go), affected neither baseline responses nor LTP production even at high concentrations (10 or 100 µM, Fig. 4A,E). The {alpha}2-receptor agonist clonidine (50 µM) showed a weak facilitatory effect on LTP maintenance without affecting baseline responses (Fig. 4B,E). A similar facilitation was produced by 10 µM UK-14304 (Cambridge 1981Go), a more specific {alpha}2 agonist (circles in Fig. 4E). The magnitude of LTP in the presence of either {alpha}2 agonist was significantly greater (P < 0.001) compared with control but significantly less (P < 0.02) compared with noradrenaline (Fig. 4E).


Figure 4
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. {alpha}2 and ß, but not {alpha}1, adrenergic agonists facilitate LTP maintenance. (A) The effects of the {alpha}1-receptor agonist methoxamine (10 µM for four cells, 100 µM for four cells) on LTP maintenance at normal [Ca2+]o. IPSP slopes were plotted against the time after HFS. Squares and triangles represent responses for test and control pathways, respectively. The horizontal bar shows the methoxamine application period. (BD) Similar to (A), but for the {alpha}2-receptor agonist clonidine (B, 50 µM, n = 8), the ß-receptor agonist isoproterenol (C, 10 µM, n = 8), and simultaneous application of these {alpha}2 and ß agonists (D, n = 8). (E) LTP magnitude, assessed at 40–50 min after HFS, for control, noradrenaline (NA), methoxamine ({alpha}1), clonidine ({alpha}2), UK-14304 (10 µM, another {alpha}2-receptor agonist, circles), isoproterenol (ß), and clonidine and isoproterenol together ({alpha}2 and ß). Each symbol represents LTP magnitude in individual cells, and the horizontal bars show the mean values. The asterisk and hash signs indicate that the values were significantly (P < 0.05) different from those for control and noradrenaline, respectively.

 
The ß-receptor agonist isoproterenol (10 µM) increased the test response significantly (P < 0.02, n = 8). The enhanced responses persisted even after washout, as shown by the control pathway responses (Fig. 4C). This lasting increase was at least in part ascribed to significant changes (P < 0.04) in the resting membrane potential and the input resistance (before, –56 ± 1.2 mV and 40 ± 3.2 M{Omega}, n = 8; after, –53 ± 1.6 mV and 43 ± 3.7 M{Omega}). HFS, which was applied after a stable baseline response was established, produced LTP in the test pathway with a magnitude slightly greater, but insignificant (P > 0.2), compared with clonidine. When these {alpha}2 and ß agonists were applied together (Fig. 4D,E), the magnitude of LTP was greater compared with either agonist alone and almost indistinguishable from that for noradrenaline (P > 0.9). Simultaneous application of these two agonists did not produce increases in test responses (P > 0.1), which occurred when isoproterenol was applied alone. These results suggest that {alpha}2 and ß receptors act synergistically to enhance the maintenance of LTP.

To confirm that these receptors mediate the facilitatory effect of noradrenaline on LTP maintenance, HFS was applied in the presence of subtype-specific adrenergic antagonists together with 5 µM noradrenaline. Consistent with the effect of agonists, LTP was abolished by application of either 1 µM rauwolscine, an {alpha}2-receptor antagonist, or 20 µM timolol, a ß-receptor antagonist (Fig. 5A–C). The change produced by HFS in the test responses at 40–50 min after HFS in either case was indistinguishable (P > 0.1) from that in control solution (cf., Figs 4E and 5C).


Figure 5
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effects of adrenergic antagonists applied together with noradrenaline on LTP production. (A) The {alpha}2-receptor antagonist rauwolscine (1 µM) was applied together with noradrenaline (5 µM) for the period indicated by the horizontal bar. Squares and triangles represent responses for test and control pathways, respectively. (B) Similar to (A), but for the ß-receptor antagonist timolol (20 µM). The number of cells was 9 in both (A) and (B). (C) LTP magnitude, assessed at 40–50 min after HFS, for noradrenaline alone (NA), and rauwolscine ({alpha}2) and timolol (ß) together with noradrenaline at normal [Ca2+]o. The asterisk indicates that the values were significantly (P < 0.05) different from those for noradrenaline.

 
LTP is maintained without noradrenaline application at high [Ca2+]o (Komatsu and Yoshimura 2000Go). However, the activation of {alpha}2 and ß receptors by the endogenous level of noradrenaline might be sufficient for maintenance in that condition. To test this possibility, experiments were conducted in the presence of {alpha}2 and ß antagonists at high [Ca2+]o. In contrast to normal [Ca2+]o, neither {alpha}2 nor ß antagonists had any effect on LTP (Fig. 6A–C). There was no difference (P > 0.6) in the magnitude of LTP in the presence of either antagonist, compared with the control value (Fig. 6E). Furthermore, LTP occurred in the simultaneous presence of very high doses of rauwolscine (5 µM) and timolol (100 µM) with a magnitude indistinguishable from the control value (P > 0.4; Fig. 6D,E). These results indicate that the activation of neither {alpha}2 nor ß receptors is required for the maintenance of LTP at high [Ca2+]o.


Figure 6
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Effects of adrenergic antagonists on LTP at high [Ca2+]o. (A) LTP produced at high [Ca2+]o (4 mM). Squares and triangles represent responses for test and control pathways, respectively. (BD) Similar to (A), but in the presence of 1 µM rauwolscine, an {alpha}2-receptor antagonist (B), 20 µM timolol, a ß-receptor antagonist (C), and high doses of rauwolscine (5 µM) and timolol (100 µM) together (D). The application period is indicated by the horizontal bar. The number of cells was nine (A), six (B), seven (C), and seven (D). (E) LTP magnitude, assessed at 40–50 min after HFS, for control, rauwolscine ({alpha}2), timolol (ß), and high doses of rauwolscine (5 µM) and timolol (100 µM) together ({alpha}2 and ß) at high [Ca2+]o. The magnitude of LTP in the presence of either antagonist or both antagonists together is not significantly (P > 0.05) different from the control value.

 
Long-Lasting Facilitation of LTP Maintenance Enables HFS to Produce LTP without Activation of {alpha}2 and ß Receptors

We then tested whether the activation of {alpha}2 and ß receptors is required for the production of LTP in the condition where LTP maintenance was facilitated long lastingly at normal [Ca2+]o (Fig. 7). We applied HFS during noradrenaline application, washed out that compound immediately after HFS, and then added high doses of rauwolscine (5 µM) and timolol (100 µM) to the medium. In the presence of these antagonists, LTP was produced by HFS applied to the pathway conditioned by the first HFS. This result rules out the possibility that the sensitivity of either {alpha}2 or ß receptors was increased so that the endogenous level of noradrenaline was able to facilitate LTP maintenance. Similarly, it is difficult to explain this facilitation by an increase in the concentration of endogenous noradrenaline. Some parts of the processes involved in LTP maintenance, downstream from these adrenoceptors, may undergo long-lasting modifications.


Figure 7
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Activation of {alpha}2 or ß receptors is unnecessary for LTP production after coapplication of HFS and noradrenaline. HFS was applied during bath application of noradrenaline, which was washed out immediately after HFS. The second HFS was applied to the pathway conditioned by the first HFS in the presence of high doses of rauwolscine (5 µM) and timolol (100 µM). The arrows show the application time for HFS. The solid and interrupted horizontal bars show the period of noradrenaline application and simultaneous application of rauwolscine and timolol, respectively. The number of cells was 5.

 
The Location of {alpha}2 and ß Receptors Contributing to the Facilitation of LTP Maintenance

To determine whether noradrenaline exerts its facilitatory effect on the pre- or postsynaptic site, we utilized pharmacological modulation of the intracellular signal transduction pathways mediating the effect of adrenoceptor activation. In this particular experiment, responses were recorded with patch electrodes under current-clamp mode. Because the activation of ß receptors is mediated by an increase in cAMP, we tested the effect of forskolin, which is a membrane-permeable adenylyl cyclase activator, at normal [Ca2+]o. Bath application of forskolin (10 µM) produced significant increases (P < 0.03) in the test response, reaching a steady level in 10–20 min, which lasted even after the termination of application. This lasting increase was at least in part ascribed to significant changes (P < 0.05) in the resting membrane potential and the input resistance (before, –58 ± 1.2 mV and 91 ± 5.0 M{Omega}, n = 9; after, –55 ± 1.6 mV and 96 ± 5.8 M{Omega}). HFS, applied at the steady level, produced LTP frequently, and the magnitude of LTP was significantly greater (P < 0.002) than that for cells recorded with patch electrodes in control solution (Fig. 8A,E). The effects of forskolin on basal responses and LTP were very similar to those of isoproterenol (cf. Fig. 4C,E), indicating that the effect of ß-receptor activation is mediated by the elevation of cAMP.


Figure 8
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Bath application, but not postsynaptic loading, of either forskolin or phorbol ester facilitates LTP maintenance. (A) Bath application of forskolin (10 µM) facilitated both basal synaptic transmission and LTP maintenance. (B) Similar to (A), but a phorbol ester PDD (10 µM) was applied instead. PDD facilitated LTP maintenance but not basal synaptic transmission. (C) Forskolin (100 µM) loaded into postsynaptic cells from patch electrodes failed to facilitate LTP maintenance. (D) Similar to (C), but PDD (100 µM) was loaded instead, which also failed to facilitate LTP maintenance. The number of cells was nine (A), seven (B), seven (C), and six (D). (E) LTP magnitude, assessed at 35–40 min after HFS, for control cells, cells that underwent bath application of forskolin or PDD, and cells to which forskolin or PDD was loaded intracellularly. All the cells shown in this figure were recorded with patch electrodes. The asterisks indicate that the values were significantly (P < 0.05) different from the control value.

 
The most familiar consequence of {alpha}2-receptor activation is an inhibition of adenylyl cyclases through {alpha} subunits of Gi proteins. However, forskolin indeed facilitated the maintenance of LTP, suggesting that the effect of {alpha}2-receptor activation is mediated by signal transduction mechanisms other than adenylyl cyclase inhibition. The activation of {alpha}2 receptors facilitates ß receptor–mediated activation of adenylyl cyclase 2 through ß{gamma} subunits of Gi proteins (Tang and Gilman 1991Go; Federman and others 1992Go; Lustig and others 1993Go; Mhaouty and others 1995Go). The formation of cAMP by this adenylyl cyclase is also facilitated by protein kinase C (PKC) (Marjamaki and others 1997Go). It is likely that adenylyl cyclase 4 and 7 have similar properties (Hanoune and Defer 2001Go). Therefore, to test whether these types of adenylyl cyclases are involved in the facilitation of LTP maintenance, we examined the effect of a PKC activator. Application of phorbol ester PDD (10 µM), which is a membrane-permeable PKC activator, facilitated LTP production without any effects on the control pathway responses (Fig. 8B,E). The magnitude of LTP was significantly greater than it was in control solution (P < 0.03), but it was slightly less compared with forskolin, although the difference was insignificant (P > 0.3). These results are consistent with the hypothesis that {alpha}2 and ß receptors facilitate LTP maintenance synergistically through the activation of adenylyl cyclase 2, 4, or 7.

Postsynaptic loading of either forskolin (100 µM) or PDD (100 µM) from patch electrodes did not allow HFS to produce LTP (Fig. 8CE). To confirm that forskolin was sufficiently loaded into postsynaptic cells, the accommodation of spike firing in response to depolarizing current pulses was examined. Bath application of forskolin (10 µM) increased the number of spikes and decreased spike intervals in forskolin-unloaded cells (Fig. 9A) as was shown for hippocampal pyramidal cells (Madison and Nicoll 1986Go). This suppression of spike accommodation disappeared in forskolin-loaded cells (Fig. 9B). Bath application of forskolin produced a significant reduction (P < 0.02, n = 6) in spike intervals in control cells but no changes (P > 0.3, n = 7) in forskolin-loaded cells (Fig. 9C), indicating that forskolin was loaded sufficiently in our experimental condition. Therefore, it is likely that the facilitatory effect of {alpha}2 and ß receptors on LTP maintenance is mediated presynaptically.


Figure 9
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. Effects of forskolin on the accommodation of spike firing. (A) Firing frequency is increased by bath application of forskolin (10 µM). Action potentials were evoked by a depolarizing current pulse (0.1 nA, 500 ms). Left and right traces show firing in response to depolarizing pulses before and during bath application of forskolin. (B) Similar to (A), but the cell was recorded with patch electrodes containing 100 µM forskolin. Bath application of forskolin failed to increase the firing frequency. (C) Average spike intervals during 500 ms depolarization pulses for cells recorded with patch electrodes without (n = 6) and with 100 µM forskolin (n = 7). Blank and filled columns represent before and 20 min after starting bath application of 10 µM forskolin, respectively. The asterisk indicates that the value was significantly (P < 0.05) different from the control values.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The present study demonstrated that noradrenaline application facilitated the maintenance of LTP at inhibitory synapses of layer-5 cells in the developing rat visual cortex. Although this facilitation was short lasting when noradrenaline was applied after HFS, it became long lasting when that application was combined with HFS. The effect of noradrenaline seems to be mediated by presynaptic {alpha}2 and ß adrenoceptors in a synergistic way. HFS produces Ca2+ entry into presynaptic terminals and a resultant Ca2+ elevation, which may modulate the intracellular signal transduction following adrenoceptor activation, leading to long-lasting facilitation of maintenance specifically at the synapses activated by HFS. Previously, we demonstrated that LTP maintenance requires action potential–associated Ca2+ entry through multiple types of high-threshold (L, N, and P type) Ca2+ channels, different from those triggering transmitter release, at the presynaptic terminals, and this Ca2+ entry is likely regulated by BK channels (Komatsu and Yoshimura 2000Go) as illustrated schematically in Fig. 10. Thus, the modulation of these channels could contribute to the facilitation. Alternatively, the Ca2+ sensitivity of biochemical processes responsible for LTP maintenance can be reduced.


Figure 10
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 10. Induction and maintenance mechanisms of visual cortical inhibitory LTP, proposed based on our previous and present studies. The molecules involved in induction and maintenance are indicated by blue and red colors, respectively. The induction of LTP requires the activation of GABAB receptors and adrenergic {alpha}1 and 5-HT2 receptors, leading to IP3 formation and Ca2+ release from the internal Ca2+ stores in the postsynaptic cells. The maintenance of LTP requires firing of presynaptic cells at least at a low frequency and Ca2+ entry through P-, L-, and N-type voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels (VDCC) at the presynaptic site, which activates Ca2+-dependent reactions different from those triggering transmitter release. The activation of ß and {alpha}2 adrenoceptors stimulates adenylyl cyclases via Gs{alpha} and G{gamma}, respectively, in a synergistic manner, and increases the cAMP level of the presynaptic site. An increased cAMP may upregulate Ca2+ channels and/or downregulate K+ channels, leading to increases in action potential–associated Ca2+ entry involved in LTP maintenance, or reduce Ca2+ sensitivity of the biochemical process responsible for maintenance. This adrenoceptor-mediated facilitation of LTP maintenance becomes long lasting when HFS is applied together with the activation of these adrenoceptors.

 
Adrenergic Facilitation of LTP Maintenance

Our previous study (Komatsu 1996Go) suggested that {alpha}1 adrenoceptors contribute to the induction of LTP through PLC activation, IP3 formation, and the resultant elevation of Ca2+ concentration in the postsynaptic cells (Fig. 10). On the other hand, the present study demonstrated that {alpha}2 and ß receptors mediate the facilitation of LTP maintenance. The ß-receptor agonist isoproterenol and adenylyl cyclase activator forskolin similarly produced the facilitation of LTP maintenance, indicating that the effect of ß-receptor activation on the facilitation is mediated by the formation of cAMP. Thus, although {alpha}2-receptor activation often inhibits adenylyl cyclases via {alpha} subunits of Gi proteins, this signaling pathway may not be involved in the facilitation. It is known that adenylyl cyclase 2 catalyzes cAMP formation in response to the activation of ß receptors and Gs{alpha}, which is facilitated by {alpha}2-receptor activation through Giß{gamma} (Fig. 10; Tang and Gilman 1991Go; Federman and others 1992Go; Lustig and others 1993Go; Mhaouty and others 1995Go). This adenylyl cyclase is also facilitated by PKC (Marjamaki and others 1997Go). It is likely that adenylyl cyclase 4 and 7 also have similar properties (Hanoune and Defer 2001Go). Our results demonstrated a facilitation of LTP maintenance by PDD, a PKC activator, supporting the view that this type of adenylyl cyclases mediates the facilitatory action of {alpha}2 and ß receptors. These three types of adenylyl cyclases are all expressed in the central nervous system (Defer and others 2000Go; Hanoune and Defer 2001Go), and, at present, it is uncertain which one is responsible for the facilitation.

In addition, we could not rule out the possibility that the effect of {alpha}2 receptors is mediated by other signaling pathways because it was suggested that {alpha}2 receptors are linked to PLC, which produces diacylglycerol that activates PKC, in some cases (Conklin and others 1992Go; Dorn II and others 1997Go). In that case, signal transduction pathways subsequent to these two adrenoceptors may converge on some of the steps to the common effecter molecules or reach separate effecter molecules, the modification of which is complementary for the facilitation of LTP maintenance.

Presynaptic Facilitation of LTP Maintenance

Our previous study showed that the maintenance mechanism of LTP is present at the presynaptic site (Komatsu and Yoshimura 2000Go). This suggests that noradrenaline exerts the facilitatory effects through adrenergic receptors located at the presynaptic site. Immunohistochemical studies suggested that {alpha}2 and ß receptors are both located at postsynaptic sites and inhibitory presynaptic terminals in rat neocortex (Aoki and others 1987Go; Venkatesan and others 1996Go). Thus, to test whether pre- or postsynaptic receptors contribute to this facilitation, we examined the effects of direct activation of signal transduction pathways following adrenoceptors. LTP maintenance was facilitated by bath application of forskolin and PDD, which are membrane permeable and may affect both pre- and postsynaptic sites, but not postsynaptic loading of these compounds. We confirmed that intracellular loading of forskolin sufficiently activated adenylyl cyclases of postsynaptic cells. These observations strongly support the supposition that presynaptic adrenoceptors are responsible for the facilitation.

However, it is known that {alpha}2 receptors are also located at noradrenergic, serotoninergic, and cholinergic nerve terminals and that their activation inhibits transmitter release (Moroni and others 1983Go; Starke and others 1989Go; Raiteri and others 1990Go; Feuerstein and others 1993Go; Tellez and others 1997Go). Thus, {alpha}2 agonists and antagonists could affect LTP maintenance indirectly through the changes in the release of these neuromodulatory transmitters. However, noradrenaline facilitates LTP maintenance, whereas {alpha}2 agonists decrease noradrenaline release from the noradrenergic nerve terminals. Therefore, it is very unlikely that {alpha}2 adrenoceptors at noradrenergic terminals contribute to LTP maintenance. Similarly, it is unlikely that {alpha}2 receptors at serotoninergic nerve terminals are involved because serotonin also facilitates LTP production (Komatsu 1996Go). We could not rule out the involvement of cholinergic nerve terminals at present. In addition, {alpha}2 and ß adrenoceptors are also present in glia (Aoki and others 1987Go; Venkatesan and others 1996Go). However, a simple interpretation of our data is that {alpha}2 and ß receptors, located both at the inhibitory presynaptic terminals, are responsible for the facilitation of LTP maintenance, which may easily explain their synergistic action.

The activation of adrenoceptors could finally upregulate L-, P-, and N-type Ca2+ channels and/or downregulate K+ channels involved in LTP maintenance (Fig. 10). It is well known that L-type Ca2+ channel activity in cardiac muscles is upregulated by ß-receptor stimulation through cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA)–mediated phosphorylation (McDonald and others 1994Go). A similar modulation was found in L- and P-type Ca2+ channels of central neurons (Gray and Johnston 1987Go; Kavalali and others 1997Go; Huang and others 1998Go). Noradrenaline also downregulates small-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels and A-type K+ channels, through the activation of ß receptor and PKA in pyramidal cells (Madison and Nicoll 1986Go; Lancaster and Nicoll 1987Go; Foehring and others 1989Go; Pedarzani and Storm 1993Go; Hoffman and Johnston 1999Go). However, in these neurons noradrenaline failed to modulate BK channels (Lancaster and Nicoll 1987Go; Foehring and others 1989Go). At present, it is uncertain which channels are involved in the facilitation of LTP maintenance.

When HFS was combined with adrenoceptor activation, this facilitation became long lasting. Ca2+ signals resulting from HFS at the presynaptic terminals may interact with signal transduction pathways subsequent to adrenoceptor activation. Ca2+-dependent signaling molecules such as Ca2+-dependent adenylyl cyclases (Defer and others 2000Go; Hanoune and Defer 2001Go) and PKC could potentially be involved in this conversion into long-term effects.

The Site of LTP Expression

Visual cortical inhibitory LTP requires a rise of postsynaptic Ca2+ concentration for induction, whereas the maintenance mechanism is present at the presynaptic site (Fig. 10). Although the expression site of this LTP remains to be determined, it is thus likely that LTP requires anterograde or retrograde signaling between pre- and postsynaptic cells irrespective of the expression site. If LTP is expressed presynaptically, some information must be sent backwards from the post- to the presysnaptic cells during induction. Recent studies have suggested that endocannabinoid and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) could act as such retrograde messengers in long-term modifications of inhibitory synaptic transmission (Chevaleyre and Castillo 2003Go; Gubellini and others 2005Go). In an experimental condition similar to that used in this study, in which non-NMDA and NMDA receptors were pharmacologically blocked, HFS produced LTD at inhibitory synapses in CA1 pyramidal cells instead of LTP (Chevaleyre and Castillo 2003Go). These authors demonstrated that LTD, expressed presynaptically, required the activation of postsynaptic metabotropic glutamate receptors, leading to the formation of endocannabinoids mediating the retrograde signal, although a rise in postsynaptic Ca2+ was not required for induction, which is different from visual cortical inhibitory LTP. On the other hand, BDNF was suggested to be a candidate retrograde messenger for LTP at inhibitory synapses in neonate CA3 pyramidal cells, which is expressed presynaptically and requires a rise in postsynaptic Ca2+ concentration for induction (Gubellini and others 2005Go). Thus, it is likely that these two substances are candidate retrograde messengers for visual cortical inhibitory LTP, if it is indeed expressed presynaptically.

If LTP is expressed postsynaptically, the transfer of information from the pre- to the postsynaptic cells is required during maintenance. Pharmacological blockade of GABAA and GABAB receptors, which abolished membrane potential changes associated with synaptic transmission in postsynaptic cells, did not affect LTP maintenance (Komatsu and Yoshimura 2000Go). In addition, blockade of presynaptic L-type Ca2+ channels, which are not involved in triggering transmitter release at most central synapses (Reuter 1996Go), abolished LTP maintenance without affecting control pathway responses (Komatsu and Yoshimura 2000Go). Thus, conventional transmitters such as GABA may not act as anterograde messengers during maintenance, and hence we favor the hypothesis of presynaptic rather than postsynaptic expression of this inhibitory LTP. Presynaptic expression may simplify the maintenance mechanism. However, we could not rule out the possibility that the anterograde signal is mediated by membrane-permeant or membrane-bound factors. Further studies are required to resolve these issues related to the site of LTP expression.

Long-Lasting Modification of Plasticity Mechanism

Neural activity can produce enduring modifications of synaptic transmission, contributing to long-term alteration of signal processing in the brain. In addition, activity can also modulate the capability of synaptic plasticity. Various types of alteration in synaptic plasticity subsequent to neural activity have been reported (Abraham and Bear 1996Go; Abraham and Tate 1997Go). In LTP of CA1 pyramidal cell excitatory synapses, the activation of NMDA receptors inhibits the subsequent induction of LTP (Huang and others 1992Go), whereas the activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors facilitates subsequent LTP induction (Bortolotto and others 1994Go; Cohen and Abraham 1996Go). These changes are likely produced by the activity of synapses undergoing modification.

Neuromodulatory afferents, those using noradrenaline, dopamine, and serotonin as transmitters, modulate synaptic plasticity by affecting cAMP and PKA, which are intimately involved in the production and regulation of plasticity through phosphorylation and synthesis of proteins (Kandel 2001Go; Nguyen and Woo 2003Go). The effects of modulatory transmitters are often long lasting, and thereby they could produce long-lasting changes in synaptic modifiability. The present study demonstrated two salient features in the adrenergic modulation of inhibitory LTP. First, noradrenaline facilitated the maintenance of LTP, although the induction mechanism was modulated in most of the cases described previously (Abraham and Tate 1997Go). Second, the facilitation occurred only at synapses, which were activated by HFS together with adrenoceptor activation.

Significance of Noradrenergic Regulation of Inhibitory LTP

The results of both our previous and present studies suggest that inhibitory LTP is strongly controlled by the activity of noradrenergic cells in locus ceruleus. Because locus ceruleus cells show spontaneous firing far less during sleep than arousal (Aston-Jones and others 1990Go), LTP may easily disappear during sleep. During arousal, sensory stimulation effectively produces firing of locus ceruleus cells (Aston-Jones and others 1990Go). It has been demonstrated that visual stimulation produces noradrenaline release in visual cortex (Marrocco and others 1987Go). Thus, visual cortical inhibitory synapses activated by such visual stimuli may receive a sufficient amount of noradrenaline from the nerve terminals of locus ceruleus cells during that activity and easily undergo potentiation. Once potentiated, a concomitant facilitation of the maintenance mechanism may allow the potentiation to persist for a considerably longer period by spontaneous firing of inhibitory cells even during sleep. Thus, inhibitory LTP, like plasticity of visual responsiveness, seems to be gated by noradrenergic cell activity (Kasamatsu and Pettigrew 1976Go; Bear and Singer 1986Go), supporting the hypothesis that inhibitory LTP contributes to experience-dependent maturation of visual cortical functions.


    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by grants from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Science, Sports, and Technology (12053228, 17300101, 17023025, 17500208, and 17023026), and the Uehara Memorial Foundation.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Abraham WC, Bear MF. 1996. Metaplasticity: the plasticity of synaptic plasticity. Trends Neurosci 19:126–130.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Abraham WC, Tate WP. 1997. Metaplasticity: a new vista across the field of synaptic plasticity. Prog Neurobiol 52:303–323.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Aoki C, Joh TH, Pickel VM. 1987. Ultrastructural localization of ß-adrenergic receptor-like immunoreactivity in the cortex and neostriatum of rat brain. Brain Res 437:264–282.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Aston-Jones G, Chiang C, Alexinsky T. 1990. Discharge of noradrenergic locus coeruleus neurons in behaving rats and monkeys suggests a role in vigilance. Prog Brain Res 88:501–520.

Bear MF, Singer W. 1986. Modulation of visual cortical plasticity by acetylcholine and noradrenaline. Nature 320:172–176.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bortolotto ZA, Bashir ZI, Davies CH, Collingridge GL. 1994. A molecular switch activated by metabotropic glutamate receptors regulates induction of long-term potentiation. Nature 368:740–743.[CrossRef][Medline]

Brocher S, Artola A, Singer W. 1992. Agonists of cholinergic and noradrenergic receptors facilitate synergistically the induction of long-term potentiation in slices of rat visual cortex. Brain Res 573:27–36.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Cambridge D. 1981. UK-14304, a potent and selective {alpha}2-agonist for the characterization of {alpha}-adrenoceptor subtypes. Eur J Pharmacol 72:413–415.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Chevaleyre V, Castillo PE. 2003. Heterosynaptic LTD of hippocampal GABAergic synapses: a novel role of endocannabinoids in regulating excitability. Neuron 38:461–472.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Cohen AS, Abraham WC. 1996. Facilitation of long-term potentiation by prior activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors. J Neurophysiol 76:953–962.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Conklin BR, Chabre O, Wong YH, Federman AD, Bourne HR. 1992. Recombinat Gq{alpha}. J Biol Chem 267:31–34.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Defer N, Best-Belpomme M, Hanoune J. 2000. Tissue specificity and physiological relevance of various isoforms of adenylyl cyclase. Am J Renal Physiol 279:F400–F416.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dorn II GW, Oswald KJ, McCluskey TS, Kuhel DG, Liggett SB. 1997. {alpha}2A-adrenergic receptor stimulated calcium release is transduced by Gi-associated Gß{gamma}-mediated activation of phospholipase C. Biochemistry 36:6415–6423.[CrossRef][Medline]

Federman AD, Conklin BR, Schrader KA, Reed RR, Bourne HR. 1992. Hormonal stimulation of adenylyl cyclase through Gi-protein ß{gamma} subunits. Nature 356:159–161.[CrossRef][Medline]

Feuerstein TJ, Mutschler A, Lupp A, Van Velthoven V, Schlicker E, Göthert M. 1993. Endogenous noradrenaline activates {alpha}2-adrenoceptors on serotonergic nerve endings in human and rat neocortex. J Neurochem 61:474–480.[ISI][Medline]

Foehring RC, Schwindt PC, Crill WE. 1989. Norepinephrine selectively reduces slow Ca2+- and Na+-mediated K+ currents in cat neocortical neurons. J Neurophysiol 61:245–256.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Frégnac Y, Imbert M. 1984. Development of neuronal selectivity in primary visual cortex of cat. Physiol Rev 64:325–434.[Free Full Text]

Gray R, Johnston D. 1987. Noradrenaline and ß-receptor agonists increase activity of voltage-dependent calcium channels in hippocampal neurons. Nature 327:620–622.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gubellini P, Ben-Ari Y, Gaïarsa J-L. 2005. Endogenous neurotrophins are required for the induction of GABAergic long-term potentiation in the neonatal rat hippocampus. J Neurosci 25:5796–5802.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hanoune J, Defer N. 2001. Regulation and role of adenylyl cyclase isoforms. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 41:1145–1174.

Hoffman DA, Johnston D. 1999. Neuromodulation of dendritic action potentials. J Neurophysiol 81:408–411.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Huang CC, Wang SJ, Gean PW. 1998. Selective enhancement of P-type calcium currents by isoproterenol in the rat amygdala. J Neurosci 18:2276–2282.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Huang YY, Colino A, Selig DK, Malenka RC. 1992. The influence of prior synaptic activity on the induction of long-term potentiation. Science 255:730–733.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kandel ER. 2001. The molecular biology of memory storage: a dialogue between genes and synapses. Science 294:1030–1038.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kasamatsu T, Pettigrew JD. 1976. Depletion of brain catecholamine: failure of ocular dominance shift after monocular occlusion in kitten. Science 194:206–209.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kato N. 1993. Mechanisms of beta-adrenergic facilitation of LTP in rat visual cortex. NeuroReport 4:1087–1090.[ISI][Medline]

Kavalali ET, Hwang KS, Plummer MR. 1997. cAMP-dependent enhancement of dihydropyridine-sensitive calcium channel availability in hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci 17:5334–5348.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kirkwood A, Rozas C, Kirkwood J, Perez F, Bear MF. 1999. Modulation of long-term synaptic depression in visual cortex by acetylcholine and norepinephrine. J Neurosci 19:1599–1609.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Komatsu Y. 1994. Age-dependent long-term potentiation of inhibitory synaptic transmission in rat visual cortex. J Neurosci 14:6488–6499.[Abstract]

Komatsu Y. 1996. GABAB receptors, monoamine receptors, and postsynaptic inositol trisphosphate-induced Ca2+ release are involved in the induction of long-term potentiation at visual cortical inhibitory synapses. J Neurosci 16:6342–6352.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Komatsu Y, Iwakiri M. 1993. Long-term modification of inhibitory synaptic transmission in developing visual cortex. NeuroReport 4:907–910.[ISI][Medline]

Komatsu Y, Yoshimura Y. 2000. Activity-dependent maintenance of long-term potentiation at visual cortical inhibitory synapses. J Neurosci 20:7539–7546.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lancaster B, Nicoll RA. 1987. Properties of two calcium-activated hyperpolarizations in rat hippocampal neurons. J Physiol (Lond) 389:187–203.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Liu HN, Kurotani T, Ren M, Yamada K, Yoshimura Y, Komatsu Y. 2004. Presynaptic activity and Ca2+ entry are required for the maintenance of NMDA receptor-independent LTP at visual cortical excitatory synapses. J Neurophysiol 92:1077–1087.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lustig KD, Conklin BR, Herzmark P, Taussig R, Bourne HR. 1993. Type II adenylyl cyclase integrates coincident signals from Gs, Gi, and Gq. J Biol Chem 268:13900–13905.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Madison DV, Nicoll RA. 1986. Cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate mediates ß-receptor actions of noradrenaline in rat hippocampal pyramidal cells. J Physiol (Lond) 372:245–259.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Marjamaki A, Sato M, Bouet-Alard R, Yang Q, Limon-Boulez I, Legrand C, Lanier SM. 1997. Factors determining the specificity of signal transduction by guanine nucleotide-binding protein-coupled receptors. J Biol Chem 272:16466–16473.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Marrocco RT, Lane RF, McClurkin JW, Blaha CD, Alkire MF. 1987. Release of cortical catecholamines by visual stimulation requires activity in thalamocortical afferents of monkey and cat. J Neurosci 7:2756–2767.[Abstract]

McDonald TF, Pelzer S, Trautwein W, Pelzer DJ. 1994. Regulation and modulation of calcium channels in cardiac, skeletal, and smooth muscle cells. Physiol Rev 74:365–507.[Free Full Text]

Mhaouty S, Cohen-Tannoudji J, Bouet-Alard R, Limon-Boulez I, Ma