Skip Navigation



Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published online on November 13, 2009

Cerebral Cortex, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp247
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ghahremani, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Poldrack, R. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ghahremani, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Poldrack, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Neural Components Underlying Behavioral Flexibility in Human Reversal Learning

Dara G. Ghahremani1, John Monterosso2, J. David Jentsch1,2,3, Robert M. Bilder2,3 and Russell A. Poldrack1,2,3

1 Department of Psychology, 2 Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, 3 Brain Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90065, USA

Address correspondence to Dara G. Ghahremani, PhD, Department of Psychology, Franz Hall, Box 951563, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90065, USA. Email: darag{at}ucla.edu.

The ability to flexibly respond to changes in the environment is critical for adaptive behavior. Reversal learning (RL) procedures test adaptive response updating when contingencies are altered. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine brain areas that support specific RL components. We compared neural responses to RL and initial learning (acquisition) to isolate reversal-related brain activation independent of cognitive control processes invoked during initial feedback-based learning. Lateral orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) was more activated during reversal than acquisition, suggesting its relevance for reformation of established stimulus–response associations. In addition, the dorsal anterior cingulate (dACC) and right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) correlated with change in postreversal accuracy. Because optimal RL likely requires suppression of a prior learned response, we hypothesized that similar regions serve both response inhibition (RI) and inhibition of learned associations during reversal. However, reversal-specific responding and stopping (requiring RI and assessed via the stop-signal task) revealed distinct frontal regions. Although RI-related regions do not appear to support inhibition of prepotent learned associations, a subset of these regions, dACC and rIFG, guide actions consistent with current reward contingencies. These regions and lateral OFC represent distinct neural components that support behavioral flexibility important for adaptive learning.

Key Words: cognitive control • fMRI • orbitofrontal cortex • response inhibition • reversal learning


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.