Skip Navigation



Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published online on September 24, 2009

Cerebral Cortex, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp194
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harrington, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rao, S. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harrington, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rao, S. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Neural Modulation of Temporal Encoding, Maintenance, and Decision Processes

Deborah L. Harrington1,2, Janice L. Zimbelman3, Sean C. Hinton4,5 and Stephen M. Rao3,4

1 Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA, 2 VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA 92161, USA, 3 Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA, 4 Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA, 5 Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL 60064, USA

Address correspondence to email: RAOS2{at}ccf.org.

Time perception emerges from an interaction among multiple processes that are normally intertwined. Therefore, a challenge has been to disentangle timekeeping from other processes. Though the striatum has been implicated in interval timing, it also modulates nontemporal processes such as working memory. To distinguish these processes, we separated neural activation associated with encoding, working-memory maintenance, and decision phases of a time-perception task. We also asked whether neuronal processing of duration (i.e., pure tone) was distinct from the processing of identity (i.e., pitch perception) or sensorimotor features (i.e., control task). Striatal activation was greater when encoding the duration than the pitch or basic sensory features, which did not differentially engage the striatum. During the maintenance phase, striatal activation was similar for duration and pitch but at baseline in the control task. In the decision phase, a stepwise reduction in striatal activation was found across the 3 tasks, with activation greatest in the timing task and weakest in the control task. Task-related striatal activations in different cognitive phases were distinguished from those of the supplementary motor area, inferior frontal gyrus, thalamus, frontoparietal cortices, and the cerebellum. Our results were consistent with a model in which timing emerges from context-dependent corticostriatal interactions.

Key Words: cerebral cortex • cognition • fMRI • striatum • timing • working memory


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.