Skip Navigation


Cerebral Cortex Advance Access first published online on July 15, 2009
This version published online on August 12, 2009

Cerebral Cortex, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp151
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
bhp151v2    most recent
bhp151v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lex, B.
Right arrow Articles by Hauber, W.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lex, B.
Right arrow Articles by Hauber, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The Role of Dopamine in the Prelimbic Cortex and the Dorsomedial Striatum in Instrumental Conditioning

Bjoern Lex and Wolfgang Hauber

Abteilung Tierphysiologie, Biologisches Institut, Universität Stuttgart, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany

Address correspondence to Wolfgang Hauber, Pfaffenwaldring 57, Biologisches Institut, Abteilung Tierphysiologie, 70550 Stuttgart, Germany. Email: Hauber{at}bio.uni-stuttgart.de.

The prelimbic (PL) region of the prefrontal cortex and the posterior subregion of the dorsomedial striatum (pDMS) are components of a corticostriatal circuit subserving instrumental learning. Here, we examined whether dopamine (DA) signals conveyed to the PL and pDMS are critical for instrumental learning. Rats with 6-hydroxydopamine or vehicle infusion into the PL and pDMS were trained to press 2 levers, either for food pellets or a sucrose solution. Thereafter, we tested whether the animals were sensitive 1) to a selective degradation of 1 of 2 outcomes using a specific satiety procedure and 2) to a selective degradation of 1 of 2 contingencies controlling instrumental behavior. Rats with PL DA depletion displayed a reduced rate of lever presses but appeared to be sensitive to outcome devaluation and contingency degradation. Thus, PL DA seems to modulate lever pressing but does not support instrumental conditioning. In contrast, rats with pDMS DA depletion had intact response rates and were sensitive to selective outcome devaluation; however, they showed a reduced sensitivity to contingency degradation. Therefore, pDMS DA signaling seems not to be involved in maintaining lever pressing but instead contributes to instrumental conditioning by supporting the detection of causal relationships between an action and its consequences.

Key Words: instrumental conditioning • posterior dorsomedial striatum • prelimbic cortex • rat


Updated to correct Figure 8.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.