Skip Navigation



Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published online on July 29, 2009

Cerebral Cortex, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp148
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prime, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, J. D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prime, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, J. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

TMS Over Human Frontal Eye Fields Disrupts Trans-saccadic Memory of Multiple Objects

Steven L. Prime1,2,3, Michael Vesia1,2,4 and J. Douglas Crawford1,2,3,4

1 Centre for Vision Research, 2 Canadian Action and Perception Network, 3 Department of Psychology, 4 Department of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada

Address correspondence to Steven L. Prime, PhD, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada. Email: prime{at}cc.umanitoba.ca.

We recently showed that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the right parietal eye fields disrupts memory of object features and locations across saccades. We applied TMS over the frontal eye fields (FEF) as subjects compared the feature details of visual targets presented either within a single eye fixation (Fixation Task) or across a saccade (Saccade Task). TMS pulses were randomly delivered at one of 3 time intervals around the time of the saccade, or at equivalent times in the Fixation Task. A No-TMS control confirmed that subjects could normally retain ~3 visual features. TMS in the Fixation Task had no effect compared with No-TMS, but differences among TMS times were found during right FEF stimulation. TMS over either the right or left FEF disrupted memory performance in the Saccade Task when stimulation coincided most closely with the saccade. The capacity to compare pre-and postsaccadic features was reduced to 1–2 objects, as expected if the spatial aspect of memory was disrupted. These findings suggest that the FEF plays a role in the spatial processing involved in trans-saccadic memory of visual features. We propose that this process employs saccade-related feedback signals similar to those observed in spatial updating.

Key Words: frontal eye fields • saccades • transcranial magnetic stimulation • trans-saccadic memory • visual working memory


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.