Skip Navigation



Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published online on June 23, 2009

Cerebral Cortex, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp121
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cho, S.
Right arrow Articles by Holyoak, K. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cho, S.
Right arrow Articles by Holyoak, K. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Common and Dissociable Prefrontal Loci Associated with Component Mechanisms of Analogical Reasoning

Soohyun Cho, Teena D. Moody, Leonardo Fernandino, Jeanette A. Mumford, Russell A. Poldrack, Tyrone D. Cannon, Barbara J. Knowlton and Keith J. Holyoak

Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563, USA

Address correspondence to Soohyun Cho, PhD, Franz Hall, Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Email: soohyun{at}psych.ucla.edu.

The ability to draw analogies requires 2 key cognitive processes, relational integration and resolution of interference. The present study aimed to identify the neural correlates of both component processes of analogical reasoning within a single, nonverbal analogy task using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. Participants verified whether a visual analogy was true by considering either 1 or 3 relational dimensions. On half of the trials, there was an additional need to resolve interference in order to make a correct judgment. Increase in the number of dimensions to integrate was associated with increased activation in the lateral prefrontal cortex as well as lateral frontal pole in both hemispheres. When there was a need to resolve interference during reasoning, activation increased in the lateral prefrontal cortex but not in the frontal pole. We identified regions in the middle and inferior frontal gyri which were exclusively sensitive to demands on each component process, in addition to a partial overlap between these neural correlates of each component process. These results indicate that analogical reasoning is mediated by the coordination of multiple regions of the prefrontal cortex, of which some are sensitive to demands on only one of these 2 component processes, whereas others are sensitive to both.

Key Words: analogy • executive control • inhibition • interference resolution • relational integration • working memory


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.