Skip Navigation



Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published online on June 22, 2009

Cerebral Cortex, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp115
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Desai, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Seidenberg, M. S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Desai, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Seidenberg, M. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Activation of Sensory–Motor Areas in Sentence Comprehension

Rutvik H. Desai1, Jeffrey R. Binder1, Lisa L. Conant1 and Mark S. Seidenberg2

1 Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA, 2 University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA

Address correspondence to Rutvik Desai, PhD, Medical College of Wisconsin, Department of Neurology, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, MEB 4550, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA. Email: rhdesai{at}mcw.edu.

The sensory–motor account of conceptual processing suggests that modality-specific attributes play a central role in the organization of object and action knowledge in the brain. An opposing view emphasizes the abstract, amodal, and symbolic character of concepts, which are thought to be represented outside the brain's sensory–motor systems. We conducted a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in which the participants listened to sentences describing hand/arm action events, visual events, or abstract behaviors. In comparison to visual and abstract sentences, areas associated with planning and control of hand movements, motion perception, and vision were activated when understanding sentences describing actions. Sensory–motor areas were activated to a greater extent also for sentences with actions that relied mostly on hands, as opposed to arms. Visual sentences activated a small area in the secondary visual cortex, whereas abstract sentences activated superior temporal and inferior frontal regions. The results support the view that linguistic understanding of actions partly involves imagery or simulation of actions, and relies on some of the same neural substrate used for planning, performing, and perceiving actions.

Key Words: simulation • conceptual organization • embodiment • semantic memory • sensory–motor theory • symbol grounding


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.