Skip Navigation



Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published online on March 17, 2009

Cerebral Cortex, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp024
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/11/2699    most recent
bhp024v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Banai, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kraus, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Banai, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kraus, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Reading and Subcortical Auditory Function

Karen Banai1,2, Jane Hornickel1, Erika Skoe1, Trent Nicol1, Steven Zecker1 and Nina Kraus1,3,4

1 Department of Communication Sciences, Auditory Neuroscience Lab, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA, 2 Department of Communication Disorders, University of Haifa, Israel, 3 Departments of Neurobiology and Physiology, 4 Otolaryngology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA

Address correspondence to Nina Kraus, Departments of Communication Sciences, Neurobiology and Physiology, and Otolaryngology, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL 60208, USA. Email: nkraus{at}northwestern.edu.

Although it is largely agreed that phonological processing deficits are a major cause of poor reading, the neural origins of phonological processing are not well understood. We now show, for the first time, that phonological decoding, measured with a test of single-nonword reading, is significantly correlated with the timing of subcortical auditory processing and also, to a lesser extent, with the robustness of subcortical representation of the harmonic content of speech, but not with pitch encoding. The relationships we observe between reading and subcortical processing fall along a continuum, with poor readers at one end and good readers at the other. These data suggest that reading skill may depend on the integrity of subcortical auditory mechanisms and are consistent with the idea that subcortical representation of the acoustic features of speech may play a role in normal reading as well as in the development of reading disorders. These data establish a significant link between subcortical auditory function and reading, thereby contributing to the understanding of the biological bases of reading. At a more general level, these findings are among the first to establish a direct relationship between subcortical sensory function and a specific cognitive skill (reading). We argue that this relationship between cortical and subcortical function could be shaped during development by the corticofugal pathway and that this cortical–subcortical link could contribute to the phonological processing deficits experienced by poor readers.

Key Words: auditory brain stem response • dyslexia • frequency-following response • phonological processing • speech encoding


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Hornickel, E. Skoe, T. Nicol, S. Zecker, and N. Kraus
Subcortical differentiation of stop consonants relates to reading and speech-in-noise perception
PNAS, August 4, 2009; 106(31): 13022 - 13027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. A. Abrams, T. Nicol, S. Zecker, and N. Kraus
Abnormal Cortical Processing of the Syllable Rate of Speech in Poor Readers
J. Neurosci., June 17, 2009; 29(24): 7686 - 7693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.