Skip Navigation



Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published online on October 14, 2008

Cerebral Cortex, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn164
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/5/1208    most recent
bhn164v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Braver, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Braver, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Distinct Neural Circuits Support Transient and Sustained Processes in Prospective Memory and Working Memory

Jeremy R. Reynolds1, Robert West2 and Todd Braver3

1 Department of Psychology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80302, USA, 2 Department of Psychology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA, 3 Department of Psychology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA

Address correspondence to Jeremy R. Reynolds, PhD, Department of Psychology, Center for Neuroscience, University of Colorado, 345 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309, USA. Email: jeremy.reynolds{at}colorado.edu.

Current theories are divided as to whether prospective memory (PM) involves primarily sustained processes such as strategic monitoring, or transient processes such as the retrieval of intentions from memory when a relevant cue is encountered. The current study examined the neural correlates of PM using a functional magnetic resonance imaging design that allows for the decomposition of brain activity into sustained and transient components. Performance of the PM task was primarily associated with sustained responses in a network including anterior prefrontal cortex (lateral Brodmann area 10), and these responses were dissociable from sustained responses associated with active maintenance in working memory. Additionally, the sustained responses in anterior prefrontal cortex correlated with faster response times for prospective responses. Prospective cues also elicited selective transient activity in a region of interest along the right middle temporal gyrus. The results support the conclusion that both sustained and transient processes contribute to efficient PM and provide novel constraints on the functional role of anterior PFC in higher-order cognition.

Key Words: anterior prefrontal cortex • cognitive control • prospective memory • working memory


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.