Skip Navigation



Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published online on February 3, 2008

Cerebral Cortex, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm256
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Masuda, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Wandell, B. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Masuda, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Wandell, B. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

V1 Projection Zone Signals in Human Macular Degeneration Depend on Task, not Stimulus

Yoichiro Masuda1,2, Serge O. Dumoulin1, Satoshi Nakadomari2 and Brian A. Wandell1

1 Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA, 2 Ophthalmology, Jikei University, School of Medicine, Tokyo, 105-8461 Japan

Address correspondence to Yoichiro Masuda, Wandell Laboratory, Jordan Hall, Building 420, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Email: massuuu{at}gmail.com.

We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess abnormal cortical signals in humans with juvenile macular degeneration (JMD). These signals have been interpreted as indicating large-scale cortical reorganization. Subjects viewed a stimulus passively or performed a task; the task was either related or unrelated to the stimulus. During passive viewing, or while performing tasks unrelated to the stimulus, there were large unresponsive V1 regions. These regions included the foveal projection zone, and we refer to them as the lesion projection zone (LPZ). In 3 JMD subjects, we observed highly significant responses in the LPZ while they performed stimulus-related judgments. In control subjects, where we presented the stimulus only within the peripheral visual field, there was no V1 response in the foveal projection zone in any condition. The difference between JMD and control responses can be explained by hypotheses that have very different implications for V1 reorganization. In controls retinal afferents carry signals indicating the presence of a uniform (zero-contrast) region of the visual field. Deletion of retinal input may 1) spur the formation of new cortical pathways that carry task-dependent signals (reorganization), or 2) unmask preexisting task-dependent cortical signals that ordinarily are suppressed by the deleted signals (no reorganization).

Key Words: feed-back • fMRI • human • plasticity • retinal degeneration • visual cortex


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.