Skip Navigation



Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published online on December 28, 2007

Cerebral Cortex, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm243
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
18/9/2169    most recent
bhm243v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duarte, A.
Right arrow Articles by Graham, K. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Duarte, A.
Right arrow Articles by Graham, K. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2007 The Authors
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

The Effects of Aging on the Neural Correlates of Subjective and Objective Recollection

Audrey Duarte1, Richard N. Henson1 and Kim S. Graham1,2

1 Medical Research Council, Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK, 2 Wales Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK

Address correspondence to Audrey Duarte, PhD, School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, 654 Cherry Street, Atlanta, GA 30332-0170, USA. Email: audrey.duarte{at}psych.gatech.edu.

High-functioning older adults can exhibit normal recollection when measured subjectively, via "remember" judgments, but not when measured objectively, via source judgments, whereas low-functioning older adults exhibit impairments for both measures. A potential explanation for this is that typical subjective and objective tests of recollection necessitate different processing demands, supported by distinct brain regions, and that deficits in these tests are observed according to the degree of age-related changes in these regions. Here, we used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure the effects of aging on neural correlates of subjective and objective measures of recollection, in young, high-functioning (Old-High) and low-functioning (Old-Low) older adults. Behaviorally, the Old-High group showed intact subjective ("remember" judgments) but impaired objective recollection (for 1 of 2 spatial or temporal sources), whereas the Old-Low group was impaired on both measures. Imaging data showed changes in parietal subjective recollection effects in the Old-Low group and in lateral frontal objective recollection effects in both older adult groups. Our results highlight the importance of examining performance variability in older adults and suggest that differential effects of aging on brain regions are associated with different patterns of performance on tests of subjective and objective recollection.

Key Words: aging • familiarity • fMRI • frontal • recollection


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. E. Peelle, V. Troiani, A. Wingfield, and M. Grossman
Neural Processing during Older Adults' Comprehension of Spoken Sentences: Age Differences in Resource Allocation and Connectivity
Cereb Cortex, August 7, 2009; (2009) bhp142v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. S. Simons, P. V. Peers, Y. S. Mazuz, M. E. Berryhill, and I. R. Olson
Dissociation Between Memory Accuracy and Memory Confidence Following Bilateral Parietal Lesions
Cereb Cortex, June 19, 2009; (2009) bhp116v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.