Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published online on February 16, 2005
Cerebral Cortex, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi039
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, 3801 University St., Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. The cognitive and neural bases of the ability to focus attention on information in one sensory modality while ignoring information in another remain poorly understood. We hypothesized that bimodal selective attention results from increased activity in corresponding sensory cortices with a suppression of activity in non-corresponding sensory cortices. In a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, we presented melodies and shapes alone (unimodal) or simultaneously (bimodal). Subjects monitored for changes in an attended modality while ignoring the other. Subsequently, memory for both attended and unattended stimuli was tested. Subjects remembered attended stimuli equally well in unimodal and bimodal conditions, and significantly better than ignored stimuli in bimodal conditions. When a subject focused on a stimulus, the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) response increased in sensory cortices corresponding to that modality in both unimodal and bimodal conditions. Additionally, the BOLD response decreased in sensory cortices corresponding to the non-presented modality in unimodal conditions and the unattended modality in bimodal conditions. We conclude that top-down attentional effects modulate the interaction of sensory cortical areas by gating sensory input. This interaction between sensory cortices enhances processing of one modality at the expense of the other during selective attention, and subsequently affects memory encoding.
Article
Attention to Simultaneous Unrelated Auditory and Visual Events: Behavioral and Neural Correlates
Jennifer A. Johnson, E-mail: Jennyj{at}ego.psych.mcgill.ca
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A.R. Mayer, A.R. Franco, J. Canive, and D.L. Harrington The Effects of Stimulus Modality and Frequency of Stimulus Presentation on Cross-modal Distraction Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2009; 19(5): 993 - 1007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Ram-Tsur, M. Faust, and A. Z. Zivotofsky Poor Performance on Serial Visual Tasks in Persons With Reading Disabilities: Impaired Working Memory? J Learn Disabil, September 1, 2008; 41(5): 437 - 450. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. M. Ciaramitaro, G. T. Buracas, and G. M. Boynton Spatial and Cross-Modal Attention Alter Responses to Unattended Sensory Information in Early Visual and Auditory Human Cortex J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 2399 - 2413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Thiel and G. R. Fink Visual and Auditory Alertness: Modality-Specific and Supramodal Neural Mechanisms and Their Modulation by Nicotine J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 2758 - 2768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Kayser, C. I. Petkov, M. Augath, and N. K. Logothetis Functional Imaging Reveals Visual Modulation of Specific Fields in Auditory Cortex J. Neurosci., February 21, 2007; 27(8): 1824 - 1835. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Baier, A. Kleinschmidt, and N. G. Muller Cross-Modal Processing in Early Visual and Auditory Cortices depends on Expected Statistical Relationship of Multisensory Information. J. Neurosci., November 22, 2006; 26(47): 12260 - 12265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



