Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (179)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCarthy, G.
Right arrow Articles by Allison, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McCarthy, G.
Right arrow Articles by Allison, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 9, No. 5, 431-444, July 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press

Electrophysiological Studies of Human Face Perception. II: Response Properties of Face-specific Potentials Generated in Occipitotemporal Cortex

Gregory McCarthy1, Aina Puce2, Aysenil Belger and Truett Allison

Neuropsychology Laboratory, VA Medical Center, West Haven, CT 06516 and Departments of Neurosurgery, Neurology and Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510 USA

In the previous paper the locations and basic response properties of N200 and other face-specific event-related potentials (ERPs) were described. In this paper responsiveness of N200 and related ERPs to the perceptual features of faces and other images was assessed. N200 amplitude did not vary substantially, whether evoked by colored or grayscale faces; normal, blurred or line-drawing faces; or by faces of different sizes. Human hands evoked small N200s at face-specific sites, but evoked hand-specific ERPs at other sites. Cat and dog faces evoked N200s that were 73% as large as to human faces. Hemifield stimulation demonstrated that the right hemisphere is better at processing information about upright faces and transferring it to the left hemisphere, whereas the left hemisphere is better at processing information about inverted faces and transferring it to the right hemisphere. N200 amplitude was largest to full faces and decreased progressively to eyes, face contours, lips and noses viewed in isolation. A region just lateral to face-specific N200 sites was more responsive to internal face parts than to faces, and some sites in ventral occipitotemporal cortex were face-partspecific. Faces with eyes averted or closed evoked larger N200s than those evoked by faces with eyes forward. N200 amplitude and latency were affected by the joint effects of eye and head position in the right but not in the left hemisphere. Full and three-quarter views of faces evoked larger N200s than did profile views. The results are discussed in relation to behavioral studies in humans and single-cell recordings in monkeys.

1 Current address: Brain Imaging and Analysis Center, Box 3808, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA

2 Current address: Brain Sciences Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, PO Box 218, Hawthorn, Victoria 3122, Australia


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
M. Eimer, M. Kiss, and S. Nicholas
Response Profile of the Face-Sensitive N170 Component: A Rapid Adaptation Study
Cereb Cortex, January 15, 2010; (2010) bhp312v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J VisHome page
P. H. J. M. Vlamings, V. Goffaux, and C. Kemner
Is the early modulation of brain activity by fearful facial expressions primarily mediated by coarse low spatial frequency information?
J Vis, May 1, 2009; 9(5): 12 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
S. Kouider, E. Eger, R. Dolan, and R. N. Henson
Activity in Face-Responsive Brain Regions is Modulated by Invisible, Attended Faces: Evidence from Masked Priming
Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2009; 19(1): 13 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
E. J. Barbeau, M. J. Taylor, J. Regis, P. Marquis, P. Chauvel, and C. Liegeois-Chauvel
Spatio temporal Dynamics of Face Recognition
Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2008; 18(5): 997 - 1009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soc Cogn Affect NeurosciHome page
P. M. Walker, L. Silvert, M. Hewstone, and A. C. Nobre
Social contact and other-race face processing in the human brain
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, March 1, 2008; 3(1): 16 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A. Harris and K. Nakayama
Rapid Adaptation of the M170 Response: Importance of Face Parts
Cereb Cortex, February 1, 2008; 18(2): 467 - 476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. Kriegeskorte, E. Formisano, B. Sorger, and R. Goebel
Individual faces elicit distinct response patterns in human anterior temporal cortex
PNAS, December 18, 2007; 104(51): 20600 - 20605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. G. Philiastides and P. Sajda
EEG-Informed fMRI Reveals Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Perceptual Decision Making
J. Neurosci., November 28, 2007; 27(48): 13082 - 13091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
P. Rotshtein, P. Vuilleumier, J. Winston, J. Driver, and R. Dolan
Distinct and Convergent Visual Processing of High and Low Spatial Frequency Information in Faces
Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2007; 17(11): 2713 - 2724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J VisHome page
C. Jacques, O. d'Arripe, and B. Rossion
The time course of the inversion effect during individual face discrimination
J Vis, June 1, 2007; 7(8): 3 - 3.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soc Cogn Affect NeurosciHome page
J. P. Morris, K. A. Pelphrey, and G. McCarthy
Controlled scanpath variation alters fusiform face activation
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, March 1, 2007; 2(1): 31 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. Kiani, H. Esteky, and K. Tanaka
Differences in Onset Latency of Macaque Inferotemporal Neural Responses to Primate and Non-Primate Faces
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2005; 94(2): 1587 - 1596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
W. C. De Souza, S. Eifuku, R. Tamura, H. Nishijo, and T. Ono
Differential Characteristics of Face Neuron Responses Within the Anterior Superior Temporal Sulcus of Macaques
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2005; 94(2): 1252 - 1266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. S. Winston, R.N.A. Henson, M. R. Fine-Goulden, and R. J. Dolan
fMRI-Adaptation Reveals Dissociable Neural Representations of Identity and Expression in Face Perception
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2004; 92(3): 1830 - 1839.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
A. S. Garrett, V. Menon, K. MacKenzie, and A. L. Reiss
Here's Looking at You, Kid: Neural Systems Underlying Face and Gaze Processing in Fragile X Syndrome
Arch Gen Psychiatry, March 1, 2004; 61(3): 281 - 288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
R. J. Itier and M. J. Taylor
N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal Differences between Object and Face Processing Using ERPs
Cereb Cortex, February 1, 2004; 14(2): 132 - 142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Eifuku, W. C. De Souza, R. Tamura, H. Nishijo, and T. Ono
Neuronal Correlates of Face Identification in the Monkey Anterior Temporal Cortical Areas
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 358 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. Allison, A. Puce, and G. McCarthy
Category-Sensitive Excitatory and Inhibitory Processes in Human Extrastriate Cortex
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2002; 88(5): 2864 - 2868.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
A. Tarkiainen, P. L. Cornelissen, and R. Salmelin
Dynamics of visual feature analysis and object-level processing in face versus letter-string perception
Brain, May 1, 2002; 125(5): 1125 - 1136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav Cogn Neurosci RevHome page
R. Adolphs
Recognizing emotion from facial expressions: psychological and neurological mechanisms.
Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, March 1, 2002; 1(1): 21 - 62.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Behav Cogn Neurosci RevHome page
B. Rossion and I. Gauthier
How does the brain process upright and inverted faces?
Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, March 1, 2002; 1(1): 63 - 75.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A. Puce, T. Allison, and G. McCarthy
Electrophysiological Studies of Human Face Perception. III: Effects of Top-down Processing on Face-specific Potentials
Cereb Cortex, July 1, 1999; 9(5): 445 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.