Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (62)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lockwood, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Burkard, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lockwood, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Burkard, R. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 9, No. 1, 65-76, January 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press

The Functional Anatomy of the Normal Human Auditory System: Responses to 0.5 and 4.0 kHz Tones at Varied Intensities

Alan H. Lockwood1,2,3,4,5, Richard J. Salvi2,5,6, Mary Lou Coad1,4, Sally A. Arnold2, David S. Wack1,4, B. W. Murphy1,4 and Robert F. Burkard2,5,6

1 Centers for Positron Emission Tomography, , 2 Hearing and Deafness, and the Hearing Research Laboratory, and Departments of , 3 Neurology, , 4 Nuclear Medicine, , 5 Communicative Disorders & Sciences and , 6 Otolaryngology, Veterans Administration Western New York Health Care System, and State University of New York, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA

Most functional imaging studies of the auditory system have employed complex stimuli. We used positron emisssion tomography to map neural responses to 0.5 and 4.0 kHz sine-wave tones presented to the right ear at 30, 50, 70 and 90 dB HL and found activation in a complex neural network of elements traditionally associated with the auditory system as well as non-traditional sites such as the posterior cingulate cortex. Cingulate activity was maximal at low stimulus intensities, suggesting that it may function as a gain control center. In the right temporal lobe, the location of the maximal response varied with the intensity, but not with the frequency of the stimuli. In the left temporal lobe, there was evidence for tonotopic organization: a site lateral to the left primary auditory cortex was activated equally by both tones while a second site in primary auditory cortex was more responsive to the higher frequency. Infratentorial activations were contralateral to the stimulated ear and included the lateral cerebellum, the lateral pontine tegmentum, the midbrain and the medial geniculate. Contrary to predictions based on cochlear membrane mechanics, at each intensity, 4.0 kHz stimuli were more potent activators of the brain than the 0.5 kHz stimuli.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. Plailly, J. D. Howard, D. R. Gitelman, and J. A. Gottfried
Attention to Odor Modulates Thalamocortical Connectivity in the Human Brain
J. Neurosci., May 14, 2008; 28(20): 5257 - 5267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. Upadhyay, M. Ducros, T. A. Knaus, K. A. Lindgren, A. Silver, H. Tager-Flusberg, and D.-S. Kim
Function and Connectivity in Human Primary Auditory Cortex: A Combined fMRI and DTI Study at 3 Tesla
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2007; 17(10): 2420 - 2432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
M. L. Seghier, C. Boex, F. Lazeyras, A. Sigrist, and M. Pelizzone
fMRI Evidence for Activation of Multiple Cortical Regions in the Primary Auditory Cortex of Deaf Subjects Users of Multichannel Cochlear Implants
Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2005; 15(1): 40 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. M. Talavage, M. I. Sereno, J. R. Melcher, P. J. Ledden, B. R. Rosen, and A. M. Dale
Tonotopic Organization in Human Auditory Cortex Revealed by Progressions of Frequency Sensitivity
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2004; 91(3): 1282 - 1296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. A. Pastor, J. Artieda, J. Arbizu, J. M. Marti-Climent, I. Penuelas, and J. C. Masdeu
Activation of Human Cerebral and Cerebellar Cortex by Auditory Stimulation at 40 Hz
J. Neurosci., December 1, 2002; 22(23): 10501 - 10506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
A. R Palmer and A Q. Summerfield
Microelectrode and neuroimaging studies of central auditory function
Br. Med. Bull., October 1, 2002; 63(1): 95 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. P. Harms and J. R. Melcher
Sound Repetition Rate in the Human Auditory Pathway: Representations in the Waveshape and Amplitude of fMRI Activation
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2002; 88(3): 1433 - 1450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Brechmann, F. Baumgart, and H. Scheich
Sound-Level-Dependent Representation of Frequency Modulations in Human Auditory Cortex: A Low-Noise fMRI Study
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 423 - 433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
B. Yvert, A. Crouzeix, O. Bertrand, A. Seither-Preisler, and C. Pantev
Multiple Supratemporal Sources of Magnetic and Electric Auditory Evoked Middle Latency Components in Humans
Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2001; 11(5): 411 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
A.H. Lockwood, D.S. Wack, R.F. Burkard, M.L. Coad, S.A. Reyes, S.A. Arnold, and R.J. Salvi
The functional anatomy of gaze-evoked tinnitus and sustained lateral gaze
Neurology, February 27, 2001; 56(4): 472 - 480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. H. Kaas and T. A. Hackett
Subdivisions of auditory cortex and processing streams in primates
PNAS, October 24, 2000; 97(22): 11793 - 11799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.