Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (65)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pollen, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pollen, D. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 9, No. 1, 4-19, January 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press

On the Neural Correlates of Visual Perception

Daniel A. Pollen

Department of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MA 01655, USA

Neurological findings suggest that the human striate cortex (V1) is an indispensable component of a neural substratum subserving static achromatic form perception in its own right and not simply as a central distributor of retinally derived information to extrastriate visual areas. This view is further supported by physiological evidence in primates that the finest-grained conjoined representation of spatial detail and retinotopic localization that underlies phenomenal visual experience for local brightness discriminations is selectively represented at cortical levels by the activity of certain neurons in V1. However, at first glance, support for these ideas would appear to be undermined by incontrovertible neurological evidence (visual hemineglect and the simultanagnosias) and recent psychophysical results on `crowding' that confirm that activation of neurons in V1 may, at times, be insufficient to generate a percept. Moreover, a recent proposal suggests that neural correlates of visual awareness must project directly to those in executive space, thus automatically excluding V1 from a related perceptual space because V1 lacks such direct projections. Both sets of concerns are, however, resolved within the context of adaptive resonance theories. Recursive loops, linking the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) through successive cortical visual areas to the temporal lobe by means of a series of ascending and descending pathways, provide a neuronal substratum at each level within a modular framework for mutually consistent descriptions of sensory data. At steady state, such networks obviate the necessity that neural correlates of visual experience project directly to those in executive space because a neural phenomenal perceptual space subserving form vision is continuously updated by information from an object recognition space equivalent to that destined to reach executive space. Within this framework, activity in V1 may engender percepts that accompany figure–ground segregations only when dynamic incongruities are resolved both within and between ascending and descending streams. Synchronous neuronal activity on a short timescale within and across cortical areas, proposed and sometimes observed as perceptual correlates, may also serve as a marker that a steady state has been achieved, which, in turn, may be a requirement for the longer time constants that accompany the emergence and stability of perceptual states compared to the faster dynamics of adapting networks and the still faster dynamics of individual action potentials. Finally, the same consensus of neuronal activity across ascending and descending pathways linking multiple cortical areas that in anatomic sequence subserve phenomenal visual experiences and object recognition may underlie the normal unity of conscious experience.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
D. A. Pollen
Fundamental Requirements for Primary Visual Perception
Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2008; 18(9): 1991 - 1998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. I. Garrido, J. M. Kilner, S. J. Kiebel, and K. J. Friston
Evoked brain responses are generated by feedback loops
PNAS, December 26, 2007; 104(52): 20961 - 20966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. Blake, D. Tadin, K. V. Sobel, T. A. Raissian, and S. C. Chong
Strength of early visual adaptation depends on visual awareness
PNAS, March 21, 2006; 103(12): 4783 - 4788.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. Silvanto, N. Lavie, and V. Walsh
Double Dissociation of V1 and V5/MT activity in Visual Awareness
Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2005; 15(11): 1736 - 1741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
C. Holscher, A. Schnee, H. Dahmen, L. Setia, and H. A. Mallot
Rats are able to navigate in virtual environments
J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2005; 208(3): 561 - 569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav Cogn Neurosci RevHome page
S. Grossberg
How does the cerebral cortex work? development, learning, attention, and 3-D vision by laminar circuits of visual cortex.
Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, March 1, 2003; 2(1): 47 - 76.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.