Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (68)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klingberg, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Klingberg, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex, Vol 8, 593-601, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Concurrent performance of two working memory tasks: potential mechanisms of interference

T Klingberg
Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. torkel.klingberg@neuro.ki.se

When two tasks are performed simultaneously, performance often deteriorates, with concomitant increases in reaction time and error rate. Three potential neurophysiological mechanisms behind this deterioration in performance have been considered here: (i) dual-task performance requires additional cognitive operations and activation of cortical areas in addition to those active during single-task performance; (ii) two tasks interfere if they require activation of the same part of cortex; and (iii) cross-modal inhibition causes interference between two tasks involving stimuli from different sensory modalities. Positron emission tomography was used to measure regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) during performance of an auditory working memory (WM) task, a visual WM task, both WM tasks (dual task) and a control condition. Compared to the control condition, the auditory and visual WM tasks activated sensory-specific areas in the superior temporal gyrus and occipital pole respectively. Both WM tasks also activated overlapping parts of cortex in the dorsolateral prefrontal, inferior parietal and cingulate cortex. There was no separate cortical area which was activated only in the dual task, and thus no area which could be associated with any dual task specific cognitive process such as task-coordination or divided attention. Decrease in rCBF in one WM task did not overlap with the areas of rCBF increase in the other WM task. However, an inhibitory mechanism could not be ruled out, since the rCBF increase in sensory specific areas was smaller in the dual- task condition than in the single-task conditions. The cortical activity underlying WM was to a large extent organized in a non-sensory specific, or non-parallel, way, and the results are consistent with the hypothesis that concurrent tasks interfere with each other if they demand activation of the same part of cortex.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. Kuriyama, K. Mishima, H. Suzuki, S. Aritake, and M. Uchiyama
Sleep Accelerates the Improvement in Working Memory Performance
J. Neurosci., October 1, 2008; 28(40): 10145 - 10150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
B. R. Postle and M. Hamidi
Nonvisual Codes and Nonvisual Brain Areas Support Visual Working Memory
Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2007; 17(9): 2151 - 2162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
J. A. Johnson, A. P. Strafella, and R. J. Zatorre
The role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in bimodal divided attention: two transcranial magnetic stimulation studies.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., June 1, 2007; 19(6): 907 - 920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
T. M. Dannhauser, Z. Walker, T. Stevens, L. Lee, M. Seal, and S. S. Shergill
The functional anatomy of divided attention in amnestic mild cognitive impairment
Brain, June 1, 2005; 128(6): 1418 - 1427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
N. Wenderoth, F. Debaere, S. Sunaert, P. v. Hecke, and S. P. Swinnen
Parieto-premotor Areas Mediate Directional Interference During Bimanual Movements
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2004; 14(10): 1153 - 1163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
N. F. Ramsey, J. M. Jansma, G. Jager, T. Van Raalten, and R. S. Kahn
Neurophysiological factors in human information processing capacity
Brain, March 1, 2004; 127(3): 517 - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J.-C. Dreher and J. Grafman
Dissociating the Roles of the Rostral Anterior Cingulate and the Lateral Prefrontal Cortices in Performing Two Tasks Simultaneously or Successively
Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2003; 13(4): 329 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
A. J. Szameitat, T. Schubert, K. Muller, and D. Y. von Cramon
Localization of Executive Functions in Dual-Task Performance with fMRI
J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 2002; 14(8): 1184 - 1199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
T. Klingberg, H. Forssberg, and H. Westerberg
Increased Brain Activity in Frontal and Parietal Cortex Underlies the Development of Visuospatial Working Memory Capacity during Childhood
J. Cogn. Neurosci., January 1, 2002; 14(1): 1 - 10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
O. Gruber
Effects of Domain-specific Interference on Brain Activation Associated with Verbal Working Memory Task Performance
Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2001; 11(11): 1047 - 1055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
P. Herath, T. Klingberg, J. Young, K. Amunts, and P. Roland
Neural Correlates of Dual Task Interference Can be Dissociated from Those of Divided Attention: an fMRI Study
Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2001; 11(9): 796 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
D. M. Barch, T. S. Braver, E. Akbudak, T. Conturo, J. Ollinger, and A. Snyder
Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Response Conflict: Effects of Response Modality and Processing Domain
Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2001; 11(9): 837 - 848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
P. C. Fletcher and R. N. A. Henson
Frontal lobes and human memory: Insights from functional neuroimaging
Brain, May 1, 2001; 124(5): 849 - 881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
A. Dagher, A. M. Owen, H. Boecker, and D. J. Brooks
The role of the striatum and hippocampus in planning: A PET activation study in Parkinson's disease
Brain, May 1, 2001; 124(5): 1020 - 1032.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
H. Garavan, T.J. Ross, S.-J. Li, and E.A. Stein
A Parametric Manipulation of Central Executive Functioning
Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2000; 10(6): 585 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
T. Iidaka, N. D. Anderson, S. Kapur, R. Cabeza, and F. I. M. Craik
The Effect of Divided Attention on Encoding and Retrieval in Episodic Memory Revealed by Positron Emission Tomography
J. Cogn. Neurosci., March 1, 2000; 12(2): 267 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
R. Cabeza and L. Nyberg
Imaging Cognition II: An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI Studies
J. Cogn. Neurosci., January 1, 2000; 12(1): 1 - 47.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. A. Bunge, T. Klingberg, R. B. Jacobsen, and J. D. E. Gabrieli
A resource model of the neural basis of executive working memory
PNAS, March 28, 2000; 97(7): 3573 - 3578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. A. Adcock, R. T. Constable, J. C. Gore, and P. S. Goldman-Rakic
Functional neuroanatomy of executive processes involved in dual-task performance
PNAS, March 28, 2000; 97(7): 3567 - 3572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.