Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paolini, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sereno, M. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paolini, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sereno, M. I.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex, Vol 8, 362-371, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press

ARTICLES

Direction selectivity in the middle lateral and lateral (ML and L) visual areas in the California ground squirrel

M Paolini and MI Sereno
Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla 92093- 0515, USA. paolini@neurobiologie.ruhr-uni-bochum.de

Extracellular recordings obtained from the extrastriate cortex of the California ground squirrel, a diurnal sciurid, show that large receptive fields and a strong direction selectivity are present in the middle lateral area (ML) and the lateral area (L), located laterally to V2 and V3. Direction selectivity was tested by presenting stimuli of varying dimensions, shapes and speeds at different locations in the visual field. Most cells in ML and L (84%) were direction selective, with a preference for fast speeds, indicating that these areas share a role in motion processing. Areas ML and L may be homologous to area MT or may represent a case of homoplasia. A directional anisotropy for motion towards the vertical meridian was found in ML and L cells, suggesting that these areas may be involved in detecting predators and other moving objects coming from the periphery, rather than in processing flow fields caused by forward locomotion, for which a centrifugal bias might be expected.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cereb CortexHome page
R. Philipp, C. Distler, and K.-P. Hoffmann
A Motion-sensitive Area in Ferret Extrastriate Visual Cortex: an Analysis in Pigmented and Albino Animals
Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2006; 16(6): 779 - 790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. A. Heimel, S. D. Van Hooser, and S. B. Nelson
Laminar Organization of Response Properties in Primary Visual Cortex of the Gray Squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis)
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2005; 94(5): 3538 - 3554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. D. Van Hooser, J. A. F. Heimel, and S. B. Nelson
Receptive Field Properties and Laminar Organization of Lateral Geniculate Nucleus in the Gray Squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis)
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2003; 90(5): 3398 - 3418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Paolini, C. Distler, F. Bremmer, M. Lappe, and K.-P. Hoffmann
Responses to Continuously Changing Optic Flow in Area MST
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2000; 84(2): 730 - 743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.