Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (32)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xiao, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Orban, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xiao, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Orban, G. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex, Vol 7, 662-677, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

The spatial distribution of the antagonistic surround of MT/V5 neurons

DK Xiao, S Raiguel, V Marcar and GA Orban
Laboratorium voor Neuro- en Psychofysiologie, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, School of Medicine, Campus Gasthuisberg, Belgium.

The majority (217/325, 66%) of the neurons in the middle temporal (MT) area/V5 show strong antagonistic surrounds, defined here by a decrease of at least 50% in the summation curve. We mapped the antagonistic surround in 145 such cells, using eight circularly distributed surround stimulus patches (Surround Asymmetry Test, SAT) and also mapped the surround in 51 of these 145 cells using a grid consisting of 25 square patches (Surround Mapping Test, SMT). Both tests showed that the angular surround distribution was non-uniform in the majority of these neurons. In half the neurons, the antagonistic surround was asymmetric, and arose from a single region on one side of the excitatory receptive field (ERF). In another quarter of the sample the surround was bilaterally symmetric, and arose from a pair of regions on opposite sides of the ERF. Only the remaining 20% showed a circularly symmetric surround distribution. These three groups differed in their laminar distribution. The SMT showed that, radially, the surround antagonism reached a maximum, on average, at 1.5 times the ERF radius. Detailed comparisons of the spatial relationships of excitatory and inhibitory regions of the RF components shows that non-homogeneity of the surround influence appears to be an intrinsic property of the surround. Such a property may underly the extraction of the surface orientation and curvature from speed patterns.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
G. A. Orban
Higher Order Visual Processing in Macaque Extrastriate Cortex
Physiol Rev, January 1, 2008; 88(1): 59 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. L. Lui, J. A. Bourne, and M. G. P. Rosa
Spatial Summation, End Inhibition and Side Inhibition in the Middle Temporal Visual Area (MT)
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 1135 - 1148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
K. Sakai and H. Nishimura
Surrounding suppression and facilitation in the determination of border ownership.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., April 1, 2006; 18(4): 562 - 579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Zaksas and T. Pasternak
Area MT Neurons Respond to Visual Motion Distant From Their Receptive Fields
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 4156 - 4167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
B. Zenger-Landolt and D. J. Heeger
Response Suppression in V1 Agrees with Psychophysics of Surround Masking
J. Neurosci., July 30, 2003; 23(17): 6884 - 6893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. L. Williams, K. D. Singh, and A. T. Smith
Surround Modulation Measured With Functional MRI in the Human Visual Cortex
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2003; 89(1): 525 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. E. Jones, W. Wang, and A. M. Sillito
Spatial Organization and Magnitude of Orientation Contrast Interactions in Primate V1
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2002; 88(5): 2796 - 2808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
H. L. O'Brien, S. J. Tetewsky, L. M. Avery, L. A. Cushman, W. Makous, and C. J. Duffy
Visual Mechanisms of Spatial Disorientation in Alzheimer's Disease
Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2001; 11(11): 1083 - 1092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. E. Jones, K. L. Grieve, W. Wang, and A. M. Sillito
Surround Suppression in Primate V1
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2001; 86(4): 2011 - 2028.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
G. A. Walker, I. Ohzawa, and R. D. Freeman
Asymmetric Suppression Outside the Classical Receptive Field of the Visual Cortex
J. Neurosci., December 1, 1999; 19(23): 10536 - 10553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. E. Raiguel, D.-K. Xiao, V. L. Marcar, and G. A. Orban
Response Latency of Macaque Area MT/V5 Neurons and Its Relationship to Stimulus Parameters
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 1999; 82(4): 1944 - 1956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Missal, R. Vogels, C.-Y. Li, and G. A. Orban
Shape Interactions in Macaque Inferior Temporal Neurons
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 1999; 82(1): 131 - 142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. L. Shulman, J. Schwarz, F. M. Miezin, and S. E. Petersen
Effect of Motion Contrast on Human Cortical Responses to Moving Stimuli
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1998; 79(5): 2794 - 2803.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.