Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olavarria, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Van Essen, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Olavarria, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Van Essen, D. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex, Vol 7, 395-404, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

The global pattern of cytochrome oxidase stripes in visual area V2 of the macaque monkey

JF Olavarria and DC Van Essen
Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195-1525, USA.

In primate visual area V2, histochemical staining for cytochrome oxidase (CO) reveals a tripartite pattern of densely labeled thick and thin stripes separated by pale interstripes. This modularity is believed to be related to functionally distinct processing streams that course through the hierarchy of visual areas. Here, we studied the overall pattern of CO stripes in V2 of the macaque monkey, using tissue that had been physically unfolded and flattened prior to histological sectioning. CO stripes were identified on the basis of their physical dimensions and on their differential immunoreactivity for the monoclonal antibody Cat-301. We observed several distinctive features of compartmental organization in V2. The most prominent was a dorso- ventral asymmetry in the stripe pattern, occurring in the majority of cases studied. In dorsal V2, most stripes measure approximately 10 mm in length and run roughly orthogonal to both the posterior and anterior borders of V2. In contrast, many stripes in ventral V2 have a curved or oblique trajectory, and some extend up to 20 mm in length. Stripes following a curved trajectory often become nearly parallel to the anterior border of V2. These differences imply an asymmetry in how the visual field maps onto dorsal versus ventral stripes. Occasionally, thin stripes fail to alternate with thick stripes but instead occur next to one other, separated only by interstripes. In three most complete reconstructions, we found that unfolded V2 is approximately 110 mm in length, approximately 900 mm2 in surface area, and that it contains approximately 28 complete sets of stripes (one thick, one thin and two interstripes), yielding an average of approximately 4 mm per set of stripes. The maximum width of ventral V2 (13-14 mm) exceeds that of dorsal V2 (10 mm), and there is a consistent narrowing of V2 in the region of foveal representation (3-5 mm).
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
S. B. Eickhoff, C. Rottschy, M. Kujovic, N. Palomero-Gallagher, and K. Zilles
Organizational Principles of Human Visual Cortex Revealed by Receptor Mapping
Cereb Cortex, March 4, 2008; (2008) bhn024v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. Xiao and D. J. Felleman
Projections from primary visual cortex to cytochrome oxidase thin stripes and interstripes of macaque visual area 2
PNAS, May 4, 2004; 101(18): 7147 - 7151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
V. L. Marcar, S. E. Raiguel, D. Xiao, and G. A. Orban
Processing of Kinetically Defined Boundaries in Areas V1 and V2 of the Macaque Monkey
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2000; 84(6): 2786 - 2798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.