Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, T.
Right arrow Articles by Shadbolt, N. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, T.
Right arrow Articles by Shadbolt, N. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex 1996; 6:789-793
© Oxford University Press 1996

Axonal Processes and Neural Plasticity. II: Adult Somatosensory Maps

T. Elliott, C. I. Howarth and N. R. Shadbolt

Department of Psychology, University of Nottingham Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK

Address correspondence to Dr T. Elliott, Department of Psychology. University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK

Following our recent presentation of an axonal process sprouting and retraction framework for ocular dominance column formation, we now apply it, unchanged, to address issues of adult somato-sensory map plasticity. Specifically, we model the rearrangement of S-I in adult rodents following denervation of a row of vibrissae, and the rearrangement of area 3b in adult monkeys following hyper-stimulation of a digit. While we do not attempt to capture the rapid changes which occur as the result of unmasking or potentiating existing connections, we demonstrate that axonal process sprouting and retraction is a possible mechanism mediating many of the long-term changes induced by anomalous peripheral activity. A significant feature of our framework, demonstrated by this study, is that it can account for plasticity in both developing and mature systems, and in different sensory modalities. In contrast, synapse-specific Hebbian models with synaptic normalization, which employ anatomically fixed connections capable of changes in efficacy, may not be able to account for both developmental and adult plasticity without the form of the imposed normalization, which enforces competition between afferents, being changed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.