Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boehm, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Denenberg, V. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boehm, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Denenberg, V. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex 1996; 6:696-700
© Oxford University Press 1996


research-article

Neocortical Ectopias in BXSB Mice: Effects upon Reference and Working Memory Systems

Gary W. Boehm, Gordon F. Sherman1, Glenn D. Rosen1, Albert M. Galaburda1 and Victor H. Denenberg

Biobehavioral Sciences Graduate Degree Program, University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269, 1Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston, MA 02215, USA

Address correspondence to Dr Victor Denenberg, Biobehavioral Sciences Graduate Degree Program, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-4154, USA

BXSB mice have an –40–60% incidence of neocortical ectopias in layer I of the prefrontal/motor cortex. Prior studies have found major behavioral differences between those with ectopias and their non-ectopic littermates. Some of these findings indicate that the two groups differ with respect to spatial reference and working memory. The purpose of this study was to measure reference and working memory in the same animals to test the hypothesis that the ectopics would have better reference memory but less effective working memory. The Lashley III maze has cul-de-sacs which must be eliminated, and T-choices where the animal has to decide whether to go left or right. Ectopic and non-ectopic mice were equally able to learn the maze and did not differ on cul-entry or T-choice errors. Then the maze was inverted and the animals were retested. Turning the maze upside down did not change the relative status of the blind alleys. Therefore, the reference memory knowledge from the prior week's training could be used to avoid entering the culs. However, inverting the maze caused a left-right mirror image reversal of the T-choices. Therefore, prior reference memory information would interfere with learning the new path through the maze, whereas working memory would enable the mouse to eliminate T-choice errors. Ectopic mice made less cul-entry errors and more T-choice errors than their non-ectopic littermates, as predicted.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav Cogn Neurosci RevHome page
R. H. Fitch and P. Tallal
Neural Mechanisms of Language-Based Learning Impairments: Insights from Human Populations and Animal Models
Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, September 1, 2003; 2(3): 155 - 178.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A. R. Jenner, A. M. Galaburda, and G. F. Sherman
Connectivity of Ectopic Neurons in the Molecular Layer of the Somatosensory Cortex in Autoimmune Mice
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2000; 10(10): 1005 - 1013.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Learn. Mem.Home page
S. A. Balogh, Y. T. Kwon, and V. H. Denenberg
Varying Intertrial Interval Reveals Temporally Defined Memory Deficits and Enhancements in NTAN1-Deficient Mice
Learn. Mem., September 1, 2000; 7(5): 279 - 286.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.