Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (69)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lueschow, A.
Right arrow Articles by Desimone, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lueschow, A.
Right arrow Articles by Desimone, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex 1994; 4:523-531
© Oxford University Press 1994


research-article

Inferior Temporal Mechanisms for Invariant Object Recognition

Andreas Lueschow, Earl K. Miller and Robert Desimone

Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health Bethesda, Maryland 20892

The specific size and retinal location of an object are readily perceived, yet recognition of an object's identity is hardly affected by transformations of its size or location, To explore how such stimulus transformations are treated by known mechanisms for visual short-term memory in inferior temporal (IT) cortex, IT cells were recorded in monkeys performing a delayed matching-to-sample task. The stimuli were pictures of complex objects, and the monkeys ignored differences in size and retinal location when matching the test items to the sample held in memory. The sensory information communicated by cells was assessed in their responses to the sample stimuli, and mnemonic information was assessed in their responses to the test stimuli. In the sensory domain, the ordering of relative stimulus preferences for nearly all cells was invariant over changes in size or location; however, some cells nonetheless preferred stimuli of a given size or location. In the mnemonic domain, the responses of many cells were modulated according to whether the test stimulus matched the sample held in memory, and these memory effects were invariant over the relative sizes and locations of the stimuli. Thus, IT neuronal populations may mediate not only the recognition and memory of object identity, which are invariant over size and location, but also the perception of the transformations themselves.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
E. Eger, J. Ashburner, J.-D. Haynes, R. J. Dolan, and G. Rees
fMRI Activity Patterns in Human LOC Carry Information about Object Exemplars within Category.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., February 1, 2008; 20(2): 356 - 370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. Zoccolan, M. Kouh, T. Poggio, and J. J. DiCarlo
Trade-Off between Object Selectivity and Tolerance in Monkey Inferotemporal Cortex
J. Neurosci., November 7, 2007; 27(45): 12292 - 12307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. F. d. C. Hamilton and S. T. Grafton
Goal Representation in Human Anterior Intraparietal Sulcus
J. Neurosci., January 25, 2006; 26(4): 1133 - 1137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. Sawamura, S. Georgieva, R. Vogels, W. Vanduffel, and G. A. Orban
Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Assess Adaptation and Size Invariance of Shape Processing by Humans and Monkeys
J. Neurosci., April 27, 2005; 25(17): 4294 - 4306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
H. Silver, P. Feldman, W. Bilker, and R. C. Gur
Working Memory Deficit as a Core Neuropsychological Dysfunction in Schizophrenia
Am J Psychiatry, October 1, 2003; 160(10): 1809 - 1816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. M. Murray, G. R. Wylie, B. A. Higgins, D. C. Javitt, C. E. Schroeder, and J. J. Foxe
The Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Illusory Contour Processing: Combined High-Density Electrical Mapping, Source Analysis, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
J. Neurosci., June 15, 2002; 22(12): 5055 - 5073.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
L. Naccache and S. Dehaene
The Priming Method: Imaging Unconscious Repetition Priming Reveals an Abstract Representation of Number in the Parietal Lobes
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2001; 11(10): 966 - 974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. Jagadeesh, L. Chelazzi, M. Mishkin, and R. Desimone
Learning Increases Stimulus Salience in Anterior Inferior Temporal Cortex of the Macaque
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2001; 86(1): 290 - 303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. A. Erickson and R. Desimone
Responses of Macaque Perirhinal Neurons during and after Visual Stimulus Association Learning
J. Neurosci., December 1, 1999; 19(23): 10404 - 10416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
J. D. Mendola, J. F. Rizzo III, G. R. Cosgrove, A. J. Cole, P. Black, and S. Corkin
Visual discrimination after anterior temporal lobectomy in humans
Neurology, March 1, 1999; 52(5): 1028 - 1028.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
P. Giannakopoulos, G. Gold, M. Duc, J.-P. Michel, P. R. Hof, and C. Bouras
Neuroanatomic correlates of visual agnosia in Alzheimer's disease: A clinicopathologic study
Neurology, January 1, 1999; 52(1): 71 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. Tang, M. Mishkin, and T. G. Aigner
Effects of muscarinic blockade in perirhinal cortex during visual recognition
PNAS, November 11, 1997; 94(23): 12667 - 12669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Theory PsychologyHome page
J. Delacour
Object Perception and Recognition: A Model for the Scientific Study of Consciousness
Theory Psychology, April 1, 1997; 7(2): 257 - 262.
[Abstract]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.