Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shenoy, K. V.
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shenoy, K. V.
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, G. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex 1993; 3:239-248
© Oxford University Press 1993


research-article

Learning by Selection in the Trion Model of Cortical Organization

Krishna V. Shenoy, Jeffrey Kaufman, John V. McGrann and Gordon L. Shaw

Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory and Department of Physics, University of California Irvine, California 92717

The basic issue of whether mammalian learning in cortex proceeds via a selection principle, as stressed by Edelman, versus an instructional one is of major importance. We present here a realization of selection learning in the trion model, which is based on the Mountcastle columnar organizational principle of cortex. We suggest that mammalian cortex starts out with an a priori connectivity between minicolumns that is highly structured in time and in space, competing between excitation and inhibition. This provides a "naive" repertoire of spatial-temporal firing patterns that stimuli and internal pro-cessing map onto. These patterns can be learned with small modifications to the connectivity strengths determined by a Hobbian learning rule. As various patterns are learned, the repertoire changes somewhat in order to respond property to various stimuli, but the majority of all possible stimuli still map onto spatial-temporal firing patterns of the original repertoire. In order to show that the example presented here is showing true selectivity and is not an artifact of more stimuli evolving into the learned pattern, we develop a selectivity measure. We suggest that some form of instructional learning (in which connectivities are finely tuned) is present for difficult tasks requiring many trials, whereas very rapid learning involves selectional learning. Both types of learning must be considered to understand behavior.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.